Gradual Interview SHOCKER!!!

A place to discuss the books in the FC and SC. *Please Note* No LC spoilers allowed in this forum. Do so in the forum below.

Moderators: kevinswatch, Orlion

Prover of Life
<i>Elohim</i>
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 1:51 pm
Location: Texas

Post by Prover of Life »

After re-reading Runes, there are many foreshadowing missed the first time. If the destruction of the Earth is a foregone conclusion, why does it have to be in a negative light? Remember...

There is wild magic graven in every rock
Contained for white gold to unleash or control.
Spoiler
Perhaps the Earth is "destroyed" when TC (white gold) looses the bands holding in the wild magic and effectively cauterizes the wounded earth. Linden as Wildwielder, could harness this thru the Staff and remake everything. As Lena said.... in the end she must heal us all.
Old man how is it that you hear these things?
Young man how is it that you do not?

Master Po
User avatar
Loredoctor
Lord
Posts: 18609
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2002 11:35 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Contact:

Post by Loredoctor »

Nav wrote:An interesting line in the What has Gone Before prologue to Runes mentioned that Elena wasn't really sane, although no one could see it except Covenant. I'd never really thought of her like that before, but looking back it now seems like quite a profound statement.
That came to mind as soon as I read about her. Well, what I mean is that Lord Foul is a master manipulator and everything that happened was to his workings. Elena's past was shaped by Foul so that she could break the Law of Death.
User avatar
Gadget nee Jemcheeta
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 2040
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 2:05 pm
Location: Cleveland

Post by Gadget nee Jemcheeta »

I got the impression that she was mad from the very beginning... she was raised by Lena, Triock and Trell right? ....
I mean, that's not a good sign to begin with. She was raised to be obsessed with Covenant... I don't know if we can blame this one on Foul, since the rape of lena was Covenant's domain, right?
Start where you are,
use what you have,
do what you can.
User avatar
alanm
Ramen
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:28 pm
Location: Shropshire. U.K.

rape of lena

Post by alanm »

have to disagree on this one. TC was a leper, impotent. The whole land is to blame for the rape of lena not TC. he was damned from the beginning.
if we take it further then the creator is to blame for choosing TC in the first place.
Image

Image
User avatar
Creator
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 4865
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 3:51 am
Location: Oak Ridge, NC

Re: rape of lena

Post by Creator »

no_limits wrote:have to disagree on this one. TC was a leper, impotent. The whole land is to blame for the rape of lena not TC. he was damned from the beginning.
if we take it further then the creator is to blame for choosing TC in the first place.
While I understand your perspective I disagree STRONGLY with your statement. It's blaming the victims for the crime! TC's lack of control, no matter how "understandable", is to blame. And that lack led to Atiarian trying to call TC and getting Hile Troy and all his mistakes; Elena and her madness and breaking the Law of Death and losing the Staff of Law; and the desecration of Revelstone by Trell.

It would be interesting to speculate how things would have turned out of TC hadn't raped Lena ....
He/She who dies with the most toys wins! Wait a minute ... I can't die!!!
User avatar
SoulBiter
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 9309
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 2:02 am
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Post by SoulBiter »

TC is definetly to blame for this. And you can see the domino effect it had on so many lives.

SoulBiter
We miss you Tracie but your Spirit will always shine brightly on the Watch Image
User avatar
jelerak
Bloodguard
Posts: 994
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:18 pm
Location: Indy by way of NOLA

The Creator's Choice...

Post by jelerak »

You have to wonder if the Creator knew what he was getting into when he chose Covenant. He may have known what Thomas' crimes were going to be, including the rape of Lena. Without the burden of his guilt, Covenant may have never chose to take the path that he did. He (the Creator) needed Covenant to have that guilt, he needed him to be who he was, or he would never have chosen him. Lena's plight may have been an acceptable casualty, a catalyst that was needed, to get Covenant going in the direction that the Creator hoped that he would take, his ultimate belief in what he was fighting for. The Creator knew enough about Covenant to know how he expected him to act. Without Lena's violation, Covenant may have never accepted the consequences of his actions. Then, none of his choices that he made (which, for good or bad, were the right choices) may have made a difference in the outcome of his battles with the Despiser. Acceptable risk? Or eternal crime? It was the Creator who put both Lena and Covenant in their situations.
User avatar
alanm
Ramen
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:28 pm
Location: Shropshire. U.K.

Post by alanm »

yo jelerak
that is a good answer. I agree the creator new what would happen when he placed TC in the land. let us not forget the

Fundamental Question of Ethics.


:D :D
Image

Image
Prover of Life
<i>Elohim</i>
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 1:51 pm
Location: Texas

Post by Prover of Life »

Thus technically, the Creator is responsible for everything that befalls the Land and the Earth. Take a risk to restore everything or destroy it all and start over? Which is more fruitful? Which has greater gain?
Old man how is it that you hear these things?
Young man how is it that you do not?

Master Po
User avatar
jelerak
Bloodguard
Posts: 994
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:18 pm
Location: Indy by way of NOLA

start over?

Post by jelerak »

OK...so to destroy everything, or to start over again? Think of it from this perspective. You have a beautiful saltwater fish tank. You have fish in that tank that you have had for years. You love your fish, and don't want to lose any of them. The tank is getting dirty and cloudy, not as pretty as it once was. But this tank has special value to you, a sentiment that cannot be restored. It was your first tank that you ever had. So the dilemna is do you start over, let all of your fish die and get a new tank? Or undertake the task and responsibility of cleaning the tank out and restoring it to it's original beauty?

I know, a screwed up analogy, but in my opinion that is similar to the Creator's dilemna. Personally, I would try to restore the beauty to that which I love ratther than start all over again.
User avatar
Creator
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 4865
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 3:51 am
Location: Oak Ridge, NC

Post by Creator »

You put a few scavenger fish in to clean up the muck!
He/She who dies with the most toys wins! Wait a minute ... I can't die!!!
User avatar
duchess of malfi
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 11104
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 9:20 pm
Location: Michigan, USA

Re: rape of lena

Post by duchess of malfi »

no_limits wrote:have to disagree on this one. TC was a leper, impotent. The whole land is to blame for the rape of lena not TC. he was damned from the beginning.
Well, I have to disagree with that. When we had dinner with Donaldson he told us that the rape was a horrible crime that Covenant committed. Covenant has the power to change worlds -- both for good and also for ill -- and the rape of an innocent girl showed the ill he is capable of.
The impotence thing is, IMHO, Covenant's way of justifying and excusing his very wrong act.

If a man who has been impotent for years popped a Viagra and raped the first pretty teenager he happens to meet, I certainly wouldn't buy impotence as an excuse for a very violent crime. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Love as thou wilt.

Image
User avatar
Gadget nee Jemcheeta
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 2040
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 2:05 pm
Location: Cleveland

Post by Gadget nee Jemcheeta »

I don't think he's justifying or excusing... I mean really, when has Mr. Covenant ever actually excused himself for ANYTHING? :)
I think it's explaining though... it's important for people to understand the reasons that things happened, so that they can prevent them from happening again.
I've always enjoyed tracing through the storyline the effects of that scene, seeing how many lives it brought pain to, before culminating in Mhoram's revelation of the paradox of Passion.....
Start where you are,
use what you have,
do what you can.
User avatar
MrKABC
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 1086
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Barrow, AK

Re: Gradual Interview SHOCKER!!!

Post by MrKABC »

Creator wrote:
SRD wrote:It follows, therefore, that between them Caer-Caveral [whose death broke the law of life] and Elena [who used Earthblood to break the law of death] have opened the door for the utter destruction of the Earth.
8O 8O 8O 8O

Any one notice this comment? Thoughts?
I was always under the impression that Linden Avery had somehow restored the Law at the somewhat cryptic ending of WGW...

"...in spite of herself, she was fading, and could not help from being hurt. But even pestilence was a distortion of the truth. It had its clear place and purpose. When it was reduced, it fit within the new Law which she set forth..."

Of course, Linden Avery was restoring the Earthpower from the Sunbane, but wouldn't you assume that the Law of Death and the Law of Life would also have been fixed in that restoration?
"This is the grace that has been given to you - to bear what must be borne."
User avatar
Sunbaneglasses
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 2460
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:39 am
Location: Jasper Alabama

My take

Post by Sunbaneglasses »

Possibly the breaking of the laws of life and death have allowed Foul to create the ceasures.If there can be no definate begining or end to anythings existance then that creates a circle,its hard to articulate what I mean,but it may open up the possibility for tears in reality where everything can exist at the same time-the falls existance may only be possible because of the breaking of the laws of life and death-get it?
User avatar
matrixman
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 8361
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 11:24 am

Post by matrixman »

MrKABC wrote:I was always under the impression that Linden Avery had somehow restored the Law at the somewhat cryptic ending of WGW...

"...in spite of herself, she was fading, and could not help from being hurt. But even pestilence was a distortion of the truth. It had its clear place and purpose. When it was reduced, it fit within the new Law which she set forth..."

Of course, Linden Avery was restoring the Earthpower from the Sunbane, but wouldn't you assume that the Law of Death and the Law of Life would also have been fixed in that restoration?
I thought as you did, too, MrKABC, but it seems we were assuming falsely. Linden wasn't actually "restoring" the old Law, she was creating a new one: "within the new Law which she set forth..."

The following Q&A from SRD's Gradual Interview should clear up the confusion:
Peter Hunt: Mr Donaldson,

thank you for 20 years of wonderful and immersive storytelling. I was lucky enough to meet you during your visit to San Francisco last month, but was too awe-struck to be coherant when you signed my copy of Runes. So please accept my thanks retrospectively <g>.

Can you help me understand the relationship between Law, Earthpower and the Staff of Law? Am I right in thinking that the destruction of the Staff weakened the structure of Law? Did that destruction make existing Laws easier to break, and Earthpower easier to corrupt?

Did the creation of the new Staff at the end of the Second Chronicles restore the broken Laws (of death, Life, etc)?

These matters are all so intuitively, well, obvious to me that I find it difficult to actually explain them. <sigh>

Let's start with Law (structure, rules, governing principles) and Earthpower (energy, vital substance). Think of our solar system. If the planets weren't in furious motion (energy), they would fall into the sun and burn up: if the planets weren't tethered by gravity (structure), they would simply sail away. Without that balance between energy and constraint, nothing could exist. (Of course, to a physicist, it's all energy in one form of another. But still the energy of gravity has to balance the energy of motion, or else nothing could exist.)

Now. The Staff of Law was created as a means to wield the energy of Earthpower safely--i.e. without violating the various constraints of Law. But because this is magic rather than technology (because it deals in symbolic unities rather than in discrete mechanisms), the Staff cannot be inherently separate from the forces and rules which it exerts. It's not a light switch, essentially distinct from the flow of electricity which it enables. In a certain sense, the Staff *is* both Law and Earthpower, just as white gold *is* wild magic. In fantasy, in magic, the tool cannot be distinguished from what the tool does.

So. Even though the Staff was never essential to the original existence of either Law or Earthpower, the simple fact of its creation means that it participates in both, and can therefore: a) strengthen both, or b) weaken both (by being destroyed). So yes, the destruction of the original Staff weakened the structure of Law.

But. This is does *not* imply that Linden's creation of a new Staff *automatically* restores the structure of Law to its original form. A tool has to be used to be effective; and the person using the tool has to know what he/she is doing. Linden, and then Sunder and Hollian, clearly have the spirit and the heart to use the Staff effectively; but they don't necessarily have the lore, the knowledge, to accomplish everything that the Staff is capable of doing. (The absence of runes on the new Staff is not an accident.) Also the new Staff is profoundly different than Berek's original creation. It was formed, not from the wood of the One Tree, but from one sentient (Findail) and one quasi-sentient (Vain) being, each of whose nature affects the inherent qualities of both the new Staff and what the new Staff can do. (And then there's the interesting question of whether Sunder and Hollian would actually *want* to heal the broken Law of Life, since by doing so they might undo themselves.) And in addition: when the new Staff was created, it became an inherent participant in both Law and Earthpower, just as Berek's did; BUT the *condition* of Law and Earthpower when Linden created her Staff was different than it was when Berek created his; and therefore the *condition* of the new Staff is also different.

So. The creation of the new Staff did not *in itself* restore the broken Laws of Death and Life. Presumably it *could*. If the right wielder used it in the right way. But that hasn't happened yet.

<whew>

(12/20/2004)
Isn't that a tremendous reply from SRD? It totally knocked me over!

(By the way, Sunbaneglasses, I smell a Runes spoiler in your post.)
User avatar
The Dark Overlord
Woodhelvennin
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 2:19 am

Post by The Dark Overlord »

My mistake too, I guess. I thought, is the law restored now or what? With the formation of the new staff.
User avatar
Krilly
<i>Elohim</i>
Posts: 212
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 8:46 pm
Location: Shorewood, IL

Post by Krilly »

"...in spite of herself, she was fading, and could not help from being hurt. But even pestilence was a distortion of the truth. It had its clear place and purpose. When it was reduced, it fit within the new Law which she set forth..."
Wow! Thanks for bringing that bit to my attention again... that knocked me for a loop. I realize now that everything that made up who Linden is and her beliefs are now the new Law of the Land. Interesting.
User avatar
SothuTheUnfetterdOne.
<i>Elohim</i>
Posts: 112
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:32 am
Location: My house

Post by SothuTheUnfetterdOne. »

Going back to jelerak's post I think tha the creator new just as much (if not more) than Foul.
I have learned a lot in the Modern Art of words.

Poetry is the Art of words, random is the modern art.
User avatar
NightBlaze
<i>Elohim</i>
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 3:18 pm

Post by NightBlaze »

Sorry folks, I have to disagree here though I have read many good points.
I really dont think the past can have total influence over the present. You can remember the past, and avoid making the same mistakes, but I think it comes back to what TC said in TOT to Linden about if he destroys the land, it's because he misunderstood, or made a mistake, not because he chooses to. I think in the end, it has to be Linden to decide if thats what she needs to do. Then again, if we have a reincarnated TC, and he has possession of the ring, I think he and Linden could stand united against Foul and be ok. In short, it would take the both of them to restore all that has been lost.
¥ NightBlaze ¥
Post Reply

Return to “The First and Second Chronicles of Thomas Covenant”