The central theme to my questions is why?:
- Why does Covenant rape Lena?
Why does Covenant have to rape Lena? In terms of the narrative, in terms of moving the book forward, why did SRD choose this particular abomination to visit unto poor Tom? We were just starting to like him, kind of, and then he goes and violates a virgin.
Why does this frustrate so many people, to the point where they throw the book across the room and never come back? (And the corollary: Why did we all stick it out?)
And why, oh, why, once Atiaran finds out what Covenant has done to his daughter, why does she not just let Triock kill him?
Why TC rapes Lena: This time through, I realized or remembered what was going on here. In the scene just before the rape, Lena has described her parents' wedding gift to the Stonedown -- a piece of orcrest and the means by which to end the community's drought. Covenant realizes how poor his own wedding gift to Joan seems in comparison; his anger and frustration build. Then Lena cannot understand how Joan could leave someone in need: "Why would such a thing happen when there is life?" TC's response:
So -- she tells him that his reality is unreal, and that his dream is reality. Without realizing it, she challenges his sanity just as surely as Lord Foul did. And so he attacks her."I'm not alive." She heard fury climbing to the top of his voice. "I'm a leper. Outcast unclean. Lepers are ugly and filthy. And abominable."
His words filled her with horror and protest. "How can it be?" she moaned. "You are not -- abominable. What world is it that dares treat you so?"
His muscles jumped still higher in his shoulders, as if his hands were locked on the throat of some tormenting demon. "It's real. This is reality. Fact. The kind of thing that kills you if you don't believe it." With a gesture of rejection toward the river, he gasped, "This is a nightmare."
Lena flared with sudden courage. "I do not believe it. It may be that your world -- but the Land -- ah, the Land is real."
I think that's at least part of an answer for my second question, too. In this scene, SRD has set up the central dichotomy of the series, in an extremely visceral way: Is the Land real or not? And will Covenant save or damn it?
Why do people throw the book across the room when they get to this part? I think it's because they're not reading past the surface actions of the characters. We all know that there is way more to the Chronicles than a pleasant romp through a fantasy realm, but many people who first come to the books may be looking for nothing more than a pleasant romp. They're not looking for deeper meanings -- they're looking for dwarves and dragons. And the rape stops them cold. I think it was in reading SRD that I first realized that fantasy could be used as a means of exploring serious topics -- mental illness, discrimination, environmental destruction -- and, y'know, still have a bit of fun.
As for Atiaran -- ah, that's another key scene. Again, SRD hammers home the central dichotomy of the series. On one hand, we have Triock telling Atiaran that Covenant has raped her daughter. At the same time, Covenant is marveling at -- and fiercely rejecting as fantasy -- the pain in his leprous fingers. He has not yet begun to realize the depth of Lena's sacrifice on his behalf, and on the behalf of the Land. But now Atiaran has a dual purpose: Not only to guide Covenant to the Lords so he can deliver his message, but also to haul him in front of them as a tribunal.
A lot happens in these two chapters -- we're truly on our way, now!