

Moderator: I'm Murrin
ur-bane wrote:Wow danlo. I M so glad U stopped posting like this b4 I got here. It has 2b the most annoying style 4 ne1 2 read.
yes i found you!Lucimay, did you find us?
![]()
Upon reading this I was immediately struck by the eloquence with which Zindell had described the Timekeeper. I thought that Mallory's assessment of the Timekeeper's esential flaws was particularly profound. I still can't help feeling that the piece is hamstrung by the faults I mentioned earlier. If some of the commas were taken out, sentences split up and a few words taken out (especially those bracketed ones), I'm sure that the impact of the piece would be even greater.He was wary of something, perhaps of giving me the book. As he paced he rubbed the muscles of his right leg and limped, slightly. He seemed at once viscious and kind, lonely, and bitter at his loneliness. Here was a man, I thought, who had never known a single day's (or night's) peace, an old, old man who had been wounded in love and cut in wars and burnt by dreams turned to ashes in his hands. He possessed a tremendous vitality, and his zest and love of life had finally led him to that paradox of human existence. He loved the air he breathed and the beating of his heart so fully and well that he had let his natural hatred of death ruin his living of life.
The biggest problem facing sci-fi writers, methinks. And I'm having a difficult time with that now myself!Nav wrote: either have a contrived exposition (usually a hallmark of lazy writing) or to have SRD-style 'Ancillary Documentation' which would've been out of place here. Sometimes it's nice to be left to figure things out for yourself, even if (as in this case) it's beyond you.
Waddley wrote:your Highness Sir Dr. Loredoctor, PhD, Esq, the Magnificent, First of his name, Second Cousin of Dragons, White-Gold-Plate Wielder!
That's what I'm talkin' about!!Nav wrote:...probably the most original piece of science fiction i've ever read.
I suppose that if it could be fully understood, it would be science, not science fiction. But I know what you mean. Some give a more detailed account of their "science." Of course, in those cases, people like me pick at it, saying, "Now wait a minute. That couldn't be right, or..." Zindell's way works very well for me. It just hints at something in such a way that I can get a glimpse of it, and feel that I almost understand it. It sort of feels like some kind of intuition.Nav wrote:I can't say I fully understand the manifold and how exactly it is travelled through.