First Annual Kevin's Watch Awards

Post by **kevinswatch** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 3:46 am

I vote for myself for the "Worst Admin" category.-jay

Post by **Warmark** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 11:34 am

I win Queeaqueq

Post by **drew** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 12:06 pm

kevinswatch wrote:I vote for myself for the "Worst Admin" category.-jay

What about Aprility Fools?

Post by **Fist and Faith** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:03 pm

ur-bane wrote:This sounds great! What about "Most creative SRD-related username" and "Most creative non-SRD related username"?

Will my favorite username please step forward.

sgtnull wrote:most poem/prose by volume?

Post by **kevinswatch** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 4:22 pm

drew wrote:
kevinswatch wrote:I vote for myself for the "Worst Admin" category.-jay
What about Aprility Fools?

Pft, are you kidding? I'm not even worthy enough to shine Aprility Fools' boots.-jay

Post by **Queeaqueg** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 8:08 pm

Best member who has the name Queeaqueg, then

Post by **The Laughing Man** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 10:43 pm

well, I have your avatar, and your name is next! bwaaahahaha!

Post by **dennisrwood** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 5:45 am

most unoriginal... I nominate myself.
I also vote myself most obvious attempt to gain number of posts to reach 4000.

Post by **matrixman** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:43 am

onewyteduck wrote:Is there a time frame we need to look at? You said you would start taking ballots on November 7.......is it 11/07/04 through 11/06/05, just 2005?

This is a question that needs answering. What time frame are we looking at, Syl? I'm assuming for now that we're only nominating stuff from the past year, though that begets its own problems. How does the "Best Avatar" award fit into this scheme? Some members have had the same avatar for a long time, while others have changed theirs several times over the course of the year. Which ones qualify? Do we just look at current avatars? That is, current since the creation of this thread? If that's the case, then we've just disqualified some excellent avatars (like Jay's classic "Rainimation" av) that have come and gone in the past year. On the other hand, maybe it's not fair to allow in the running avatars that are no longer in use. (This problem also applies to Best Title and Best Signature.)

Needless to say (but I'll say it anyway), the Best Chapter Dissection category by its nature is outside any time frame restrictions.

Spring wrote:Best topic would be nice. 'Best Post' is a very broad spectrum.

Best Topic seems just as thorny to me, if we're going with topics from just the past year. A topic begun last November would obviously qualify. But let's say there was a good topic that was started prior to November, but replies to that topic extend into November. Or let's say there was a really old but good topic that got revived and whose replies now extend into the November time frame. What qualifies and what doesn't?

Hope everyone takes my comments as constructive criticism. Maybe I'm taking this thing way too seriously, but I think it's important to establish the criteria for nominations as clearly as possible right now to avoid confusion and misunderstanding. (:cough: anthology :cough:)

Post by **dennisrwood** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:57 am

i think sgtnull has the best avatar.

Post by **Queeaqueg** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 10:01 am

I can change.

Best 'What are you' thread

Post by **CovenantJr** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 2:45 pm

QWarmark wrote:I win Queeaqueq

Sneaky

I think MM raised some valid points that need to be addressed if this thing is going to happen. Do we count topics before the year period, but remained active into this year?

I vote keep it simple. Anything that occurred this year is fair game. So a topic started last year but that is still active is a no.

Post by **I'm Murrin** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 2:51 pm

How about ongoing topics like 'What are you reading' and the like? The best posts aren't as likely to appear in those topics, but they should be in the running at least.

Post by **The Laughing Man** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 5:53 pm

Mr Ed

A horse is a horse, of course, of course,
and no one can talk to a horse of course
That is, of course, unless the horse is the famous Mr. Ed.

Go right to the source and ask the horse
he'll give you the answer that you'll endorse.
He's always on a steady course.
Talk to Mr. Ed

People yakkity yak a streak and waste your time of day
But Mister Ed will never speak unless he has something to say.

A horse is a horse, of course, of course,
and this one'll talk 'til his voice is hoarse.
You never heard of a talking horse?
Well listen to this.
"I am Mister Ed."

I have your friends! give up!

Post by **Warmark** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 7:01 pm

CovenantJr wrote:
QWarmark wrote:I win Queeaqueq
Sneaky

My sneakieness is only surpassed by my cunning.

Post by **sgt.null** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:35 pm

is there actual voting by members, or by the mods?

Post by **Sunbaneglasses** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:40 am

Who does the nominating?Voting?And do you get a little golden KW statue?

Post by **Dragonlily** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:42 am

By the members.

I nominate Edjey for best snitching of avatars.

Post by **The Laughing Man** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:02 am

no, bane, ju get a BEEEEEEG WAN!

Post by **sgt.null** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:28 am

the mods should make a certificate, suitable for framing, for the winners.