peter wrote:Linna Heartlistener wrote:I was thinking about the "good people / bad people" dichotomy...
From my own stand point Lina, which is about all I can answer from, as I get older I'm coming more to see that goodness and badness is a mixture that we all have in us...
I definitely agree with that.
peter wrote:..and [what we see as being one or the other in other people is] much more dependant upon our personal beliefs than I had previousely recognized.
Lately, I've been thinking that it's even more self-serving than that.
I think we attribute inordinate degrees of ill to others others' character and motives if they stand in the way of us (as individuals) and our (individual) agendas.
But part of it is I'm still turning over in my head a short story I read called "
A Good Man is Hard to Find," in which the author hints at that even when we call others "good," we're often doing it for
very self-serving reasons.
peter wrote:"So," I said, "Lets get this clear. Her bennefits are to be cut for not turning up for a job which she didn't have and for which she wasn't going to be paid.
Sounds accurate enough!
shaun wrote:As for broken brains, whilst I agree with your 'in different ways' kaput theory, in this case, my brain was in a physical fog from Lyme Disease for which I recently tested positive. (It has many delightful symptoms, cognitive impairment now and again, being one of them!)
I'm sorry!
So it's intermittent.. do you know if it's likely to be temporary, or persist long-term?
vraith wrote:The sheer size/expansion of our connections and relationship is orders of magnitude greater and more complex than it used to be. Yet the number of people we know well, thoroughly, deeply is much smaller...so the areas where we don't draw hard lines is shrinking.
this made me think... also, about not just the people whom we "know," but also about the people with whom we share consequences.
Putting yourself in a position where you are sharing the consequences of another's actions... that often forces you break through and admit to yourself what you "see" past the mask of who people merely say they are.
vraith wrote:En masse we probably know less about our own children than previous generations knew about their entire tribe/town.
I'm going to mimic Hashi's point here and point out, "Wasn't it often the case that those previous generations did not recognize the
other tribes/towns as being actually properly human?"
And... ah, simplifying... yes; many days I despise inappropriate simplifications. (especially those in which the matter under question is the human condition)
The false certainty/confidence is a pain.
vraith wrote:...BUT the research shows that the students actually learning the most and performing the best say it is a little UNclear, doesn't quite make sense, only partly understood.
Well, if students are there to learn things they don't yet know, it should be no surprise if they often
don't know what they don't know.
(where of course I really mean "they don't know the magnitude of how much there is they do or do not understand.")