Is it unrealistic to even attempt to make a movie?

A place to discuss the books in the FC and SC. *Please Note* No LC spoilers allowed in this forum. Do so in the forum below.

Moderators: kevinswatch, Orlion

Lazy Luke
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 1369
Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 9:19 am
Location: Plasticdisguiseville

Re: Ben-Hur 2016

Post by Lazy Luke »

Horrim Carabal wrote:SRD needs to be creative consultant AT A MINIMUM and hopefully more than that. I know he has said he's not interested, but come on. Drive a dumptruck full of money up to his ranch or something...get him onboard.
...............vroom vroom
User avatar
Horrim Carabal
<i>Haruchai</i>
Posts: 612
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:13 am
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Post by Horrim Carabal »

SRD's reluctance to participate means he'd be a much more effective "watchdog" and guardian of the show's (or movie's) authenticity. If he were cheerleading for an adaptation, he'd be emotionally invested in it and more willing to let crap slide by in order to get the thing made.
Lazy Luke
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 1369
Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 9:19 am
Location: Plasticdisguiseville

Post by Lazy Luke »

I can't recall where, but I read that SRD had begun learning how to write a screenplay - differing to prose as astrology is to astronomy, I imagine.
Why do you think he would do that, unless seriously involved with a movie, (or show)?
Non-member of the happy clappy club
User avatar
wayfriend
.
Posts: 20957
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by wayfriend »

IIRC, his publishers asked him to produce a treatment, which isn't really a screenplay, more like a flavor for what a screenplay could be. How the story could be told in the cinematic format. Presumably so that they could more easily sell the movie rights. I am sure other authors have been requested for the same thing, especially when there was no one else who would do it. But it doesn't mean that a movie is in the works.
User avatar
Horrim Carabal
<i>Haruchai</i>
Posts: 612
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:13 am
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Post by Horrim Carabal »

wayfriend wrote:IIRC, his publishers asked him to produce a treatment, which isn't really a screenplay, more like a flavor for what a screenplay could be. How the story could be told in the cinematic format. Presumably so that they could more easily sell the movie rights. I am sure other authors have been requested for the same thing, especially when there was no one else who would do it. But it doesn't mean that a movie is in the works.
It also doesn't mean a movie is NOT in the works! :lol:
User avatar
Skyweir
Lord of Light
Posts: 25188
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2002 6:27 am
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Post by Skyweir »

oooooh how excite .. definitely hoping 🤞
ImageImageImageImage
keep smiling 😊 :D 😊

'Smoke me a kipper .. I'll be back for breakfast!'
Image

EZBoard SURVIVOR
User avatar
wayfriend
.
Posts: 20957
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by wayfriend »

Horrim Carabal wrote:It also doesn't mean a movie is NOT in the works! :lol:
I'm afraid it does. They wouldn't be trying to make it more enticing to potential buyers if it was already sold or even if there was serious curiosity.

I hope you guys have seen the Movie News thread and have read about the rise and fall of the Orloff project.
User avatar
Horrim Carabal
<i>Haruchai</i>
Posts: 612
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:13 am
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Post by Horrim Carabal »

wayfriend wrote:
Horrim Carabal wrote:It also doesn't mean a movie is NOT in the works! :lol:
I'm afraid it does. They wouldn't be trying to make it more enticing to potential buyers if it was already sold or even if there was serious curiosity.

I hope you guys have seen the Movie News thread and have read about the rise and fall of the Orloff project.
No...
Can you provide a link?
User avatar
wayfriend
.
Posts: 20957
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by wayfriend »

+ Movie News
+ Movie News Discussion

There are other topics as well. But you can use Search, too.
User avatar
Skyweir
Lord of Light
Posts: 25188
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2002 6:27 am
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Post by Skyweir »

Ive not seen these threads either .. cheers Wayfriend
ImageImageImageImage
keep smiling 😊 :D 😊

'Smoke me a kipper .. I'll be back for breakfast!'
Image

EZBoard SURVIVOR
User avatar
Horrim Carabal
<i>Haruchai</i>
Posts: 612
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:13 am
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Post by Horrim Carabal »

Yes thank you!
User avatar
darthbuzz
<i>Elohim</i>
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2020 6:58 pm
Location: London, ENGLAND
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by darthbuzz »

dANdeLION - yes.
It should be a 10 season TV series like Game of Thrones... but without a rushed ending.
And please no direction from J J Abrams or Rian Johnson. :rant: :x :throwup:


_________
"You'll never change the world if you worry about being liked"
User avatar
Horrim Carabal
<i>Haruchai</i>
Posts: 612
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:13 am
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Post by Horrim Carabal »

darthbuzz wrote: And please no direction from J J Abrams or Rian Johnson. :rant: :x :throwup:
Agreed there. Those two have single-handedly killed my interest in Star Wars (mainly due to what they did to Luke, my favorite SW character). I didn't even see the last movie.

Anyway, a Chronicles TV series would be better than a movie at this point. Get it on Netflix, HBO, Showtime, wherever. And get SRD involved as a consultant or something.
Ozment
Servant of the Land
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 5:24 am
Location: Pasadena, CA

Post by Ozment »

How reliable is is the website Movie insider? I just saw the below article posted today. Not sure about the "Saturn and his representatives" comment though.

The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant.
User avatar
wayfriend
.
Posts: 20957
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by wayfriend »

That's all really, really, really old stuff. Orloff's rights on the movie expired thirteen years ago.

You can read about it in more detail here: Movie News
.
mhoram99
Servant of the Land
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:17 am
Location: Maplewood, NJ
Contact:

Post by mhoram99 »

I agree with several comments on this thread arguing that the first two series could be made into films. An HBO series with perhaps a season for each book might be easier than a feature-length movie but the technical parts of portraying a fantasy world are no problem now. The internal thought parts have to be externalized through new dialog and good acting, and the story might have to be altered in some ways to make good film. But it is do-able. The one part that might be impossible to capture in a non-cheesy way is the health sense, ie. the earthpower-based sixth sense of things are right or corrupt relative to their natures. Adding an aura around things would look cartoonish. But there may be creative solutions to this that I have not thought of.
starkllr
Ramen
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2003 3:21 pm
Location: Arlington, VA
Contact:

Post by starkllr »

mhoram99 wrote:The one part that might be impossible to capture in a non-cheesy way is the health sense, ie. the earthpower-based sixth sense of things are right or corrupt relative to their natures. Adding an aura around things would look cartoonish. But there may be creative solutions to this that I have not thought of.
I agree. I can picture in my mind how things look to people in the Land with health sense. But I can't see how it would look good on film.

It's sort of like Zaphod's two heads in the Hitchhiker's Guide movie - there is no way to make that not look ridiculous, regardless of how good the effects are, because it's just a ridiculous thing. Or any superhero with "stretching" powers. Some things just don't translate well visually, no matter how much money you spend on CGI.
User avatar
samrw3
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 1842
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:05 am
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by samrw3 »

Agreed - it would be difficult to show health sense. However, I think it is possible to show it indirectly.

Examples - touching a rock (sorry forget the name of the stone in first book that Triock uses) and showing it heat up could be pretty easy CGI. Or showing plants come back from near death (even if a scene never happens like that in first book could create a scene) then have two characters talk about how that was healed with health sense. Or showing Covenant rugged before going into Glimmermere and coming out fresh afterwards. That example is easiest because even in the books there is some discussion about how powerful Glimmermere is.

So basically a lot of "establishing" shots of the power and effects of health sense and Earthpower without create a fake aura.
Not every person is going to understand you and that's okay. They have a right to their opinion and you have every right to ignore it.
Lazy Luke
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 1369
Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 9:19 am
Location: Plasticdisguiseville

Post by Lazy Luke »

starkllr wrote:
mhoram99 wrote:The one part that might be impossible to capture in a non-cheesy way is the health sense, ie. the earthpower-based sixth sense of things are right or corrupt relative to their natures. Adding an aura around things would look cartoonish. But there may be creative solutions to this that I have not thought of.
I agree. I can picture in my mind how things look to people in the Land with health sense. But I can't see how it would look good on film.
There are numerous creative effects in the Marvel Universe films that could fit neatly into The Land.
User avatar
wayfriend
.
Posts: 20957
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by wayfriend »

First of all, I do believe that it's possible to represent health-sense in some way, but I would suggest only doing it when it serves the story ... not something that's "on" all the time.

For example, when Covenant first "sees" that a tree is unhealthy.

This implies that it only works when shown from a characters' point of view.

For example, when Covenant first "sees" that a tree is unhealthy, we get a brief glimpse of how he sees the tree, with health sense effects enabled.

But the key, I think, is developing a visual language for things like sturdiness, rot, poison, evil, or heartiness.

I like the idea of an ICONIC language, involving shapes and colors. These shapes would combine into a weave-like pattern which would be shown wrapping the object or glowing from within the object. Green tendrils for healthy growth, yellow hexagons for strength, purple blotches for poison.

For example, when Covenant first sees a tree, we might see some thin green tendrils wrapping the tree, and then this may fade to reveal a column of yellow hexagons within the tree, but the hexagons are broken, and have missing pieces. This is Covenant first noticing that the tree is growing, but then noticing that it's core is compromised and failing.

The whole thing doesn't work unless you provide examples to the audience in order to establish a meaning. The audience needs to see it, and then someone needs to say aloud what it means. It doesn't take long to build a language that doesn't need explaining.

Then you can add to it and make it critical to the story.

When someone looks at Covenant, we can see Covenant from their point of view ... but no iconography. "You are closed to me."

When we first meet Saltheart, we might get a health-sense glimpse showing great strength as an armor of bold yellow hexagons.

Imagine if evil appears as an emerald fog ... the audience would know all about the Illearth Stone the minute they see it.

Those are my thoughts. Had them for a while.
.
Post Reply

Return to “The First and Second Chronicles of Thomas Covenant”