The same way you write a TV-show about nothing?wayfriend wrote:How can you write a scientific treatise about nothing?
Just a thawt.
Moderators: Xar, Fist and Faith
Interesting to discuss any thing, defining it really helps ~ defining the subject under exploration and identifying its parameters ~ what it is and what it isn’t, probably is and probably isn’t, may be may not be etcFist and Faith wrote: ↑To be more thorough, we are talking no space in which anything could have extension, no time in which anything could have duration. Space and time are things that exist, after all, so, if we're talking about absolute non-existence, they would be gone, also. I'm not sure I can really wrap my mind around the absence of even those things. Not talking about an empty void with nothing in it. Not talking about time endlessly passing with nothing aging. The absence of them means no field in which to notice the absence of everything else. No big, empty thing. Not even a void, since, to my thinking, that would have boundaries.peter wrote:- we are talking a nothing that has no extension in space, no duration in time,
The problem that I see here is that instability presumes something which is unstable, and hence it is not nothing.
Indeed it is. I try to look at it with the blind spot in our eyes. Find some small, bright spot, close one eye, and move your eye until the spot disappears. If you know what I mean.