Defining Passion. . . ?

A place to discuss the books in the FC and SC. *Please Note* No LC spoilers allowed in this forum. Do so in the forum below.

Moderators: Orlion, kevinswatch

Post Reply
Dagonet
Stonedownor
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:03 pm

Defining Passion. . . ?

Post by Dagonet »

From The Power That Preserves, we have this description of Foul:

"a being who loathed life, not because it was any threat to him, but because its mortal infestations offended the defining passion of his existence."


Have we ever heard, officially, just what this defining passion is?

Cheers,

Dagonet
User avatar
Xar
Lord
Posts: 3330
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 8:41 pm
Location: Watching over the Pantheon...

Post by Xar »

Not explicitly, but my idea is that Foul desperately wants to be free, and is striving with all his might to do so; mortals, who are free within what is a prison to him, are obviously loathsome to him.
User avatar
Nerdanel
Bloodguard
Posts: 770
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 10:47 pm

Post by Nerdanel »

From the scene I got the idea that Lord Foul really, really liked the sort of cold perfection humans are inherently unable to live up to.
User avatar
Xar
Lord
Posts: 3330
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 8:41 pm
Location: Watching over the Pantheon...

Post by Xar »

It is of course possible that the concept was changed slightly - after all, SRD didn't expect he would write the SC when he got to TPTP. But I do think that Foul is actually a very passional entity. If he seems cold, it's just because he loathes and feels contempt for those who live in his prison; but the passion with which he tried to blast the Arch of Time at the end of the SC speaks eloquently of the yearning, the burning desire, and the rage he feels inside.
User avatar
Nerdanel
Bloodguard
Posts: 770
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 10:47 pm

Post by Nerdanel »

What I meant was that Lord Foul has a passion for cold perfection.

Consider the architecture and detail of Ridjeck Thome. I think they reveal a lot of Lord Foul's personality, which Covenant also was able to discern in the scene in question.

The cleverly-planned labyrinthine designs and secret passages tell of a meticulous and innovative cunning that tries to have plans prepared for every eventuality. (Like we hadn't learned that already...)

The empty perfection and smooth lack of ornamentation of any kind tell that Foul isn't at all like some more human villain like Kasreyn of the Gyre. Foul likes perfectly symmetrical and featureless room with nothing in them. Compared to that, mere human beings must look awfully messy. Even Giants can't work stone like that. In many things Lord Foul has higher standards than the Haruchai and all life falls short. From the context I think it's clear that Covenant caught a glimpse of just that.
User avatar
Zarathustra
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 19848
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:23 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by Zarathustra »

Isn't his defining passion the desire to be free? And since he is imprisoned within Time, mortal beings offend him because they represent his predicament: creatures of freewill who transcend the mortal world, and yet are still constrained by it.

Remember, Foul is an archetype. He represents one way in which we can react towards our own "imprisonment" within this mortal, limited flesh. Our own defining passion is to be free, to be unlimited in both potential and in lifepsan. Yet, we must constantly confront the fact that both our power and our life is essentially limited. We can either despair/despise this fact (LF's choice), or we can choose to celebrate life in spite of its essentially limited nature. Covenant was on the "razor's edge"--just as we all are--because he could have gone either way.
User avatar
Nerdanel
Bloodguard
Posts: 770
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 10:47 pm

Post by Nerdanel »

I think talking about Lord Foul's desire to be free is bringing something to the scene that isn't there. The whole freedom angle doesn't get that much play in the First Chronicles.

I think perhaps getting free is Foul's #1 current concern, but his defining passion of cold perfection would remain with him even if he ever freed himself, because it's what deep down makes him what he is and gives him the ability to despise everything.
Dagonet
Stonedownor
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:03 pm

Post by Dagonet »

I'm with Nerdanel on this one. While Foul's (occasionally insane) desire to escape the confines of the Arch underlies pretty much everything he does, I'd say it's a result of his passion, rather than the passion itself.

Actually, I think Foul and Kasreyn are *very* similar--each of them has a consuming desire to create perfect, flawless works. The difference is that (presumably) Foul was actually able to do so before the Creator stuffed him into the Arch. Foul's Creche is as close as the Despiser can get to a perfect creation within the limits of time--uninhabited, unsullied by beings who eat and sleep and make a mess, it's still flawed (the crusty/gross throne).

Of course, if Foul (as opposed to the Creator) is the one who creates perfect works, that puts an interesting spin on those mysterious, hidden banes spread throughout the fabric of creation. . .

Xar and Malik23, if Foul hates the inhabitants of The Land because they represent his prison, is he really a *Despiser*? Don't you typically despise from a position of superiority, rather than a position of envy or anger? I've always gotten the impression that Foul despises, well, everyone else because he [considers himself] BETTER than they are.
User avatar
Xar
Lord
Posts: 3330
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 8:41 pm
Location: Watching over the Pantheon...

Post by Xar »

Dagonet wrote:Actually, I think Foul and Kasreyn are *very* similar--each of them has a consuming desire to create perfect, flawless works. The difference is that (presumably) Foul was actually able to do so before the Creator stuffed him into the Arch. Foul's Creche is as close as the Despiser can get to a perfect creation within the limits of time--uninhabited, unsullied by beings who eat and sleep and make a mess, it's still flawed (the crusty/gross throne).
Although the throne was not originally "crusty"; as I recall, it was said that the throne was twisted and moulded due to the malice and despite Foul radiated for ages while sitting there - basically, it was Foul's scorn that was so powerful that mere stone could not contain it and was warped as a result. I wonder if Foul felt disgusted by the throne (because it wasn't perfect) or if he considered it a sign of his power and a mark of his contempt...
Dagonet wrote:Xar and Malik23, if Foul hates the inhabitants of The Land because they represent his prison, is he really a *Despiser*? Don't you typically despise from a position of superiority, rather than a position of envy or anger? I've always gotten the impression that Foul despises, well, everyone else because he [considers himself] BETTER than they are.
Well, I figure that Foul feels both anger and envy, but also superiority. From his point of view, he's in a prison where the ants are more free than he is, because they are not constrained like he is - the prison is to them their natural habitat, like the void (presumably) would be Foul's. So basically my idea is that he's envious of the freedom of the Land's people, and he's also furious because he's superior to them, and yet suffers much more than they do.
Post Reply

Return to “The First and Second Chronicles of Thomas Covenant”