With this in mind I decided to see how culturally up-to-speed I was by noting what in my [granted low] understanding of the matter, could reasonably now be designated as sepparate sub-divisions of the accepted two genders.The first thing you need to know about the new sexual revolution isn't how to do it; it's how to talk it. Using terms such as straight, gay and bi-sexual is indicative of a 'binary' view of sexuality. It is fast becoming the equivalent of walking around in plus fours, peering at human desire through a monocle. These days young people are declaring themselves 'pansexual', 'genderfluid' and 'genderqueer'. Many now seem as preoccupied with finely catagorising their sexual and gender identities as their grandparents once were with their stamp collections. In the past gender-bending was a means of defying labels; today it more often seems like a way of aquiring them.
On the Male side we must start [for ease's sake, no other] with the 100% heterosexual male. Then we might have the 100% gay male which must be further sub-divided into the effeminate and non-effeminate gropings. There will then be the fine and infinite gradations that run between 100% male heterosexual and 100% homosexual ends of the spectrum - on each side of the susequnt sub-grouping into effeminate and non-effeminate.
Now we move into the more complex areas of the trans-sexual, the hermaphrodite, the transvestitie, the gender realigned, the partially gender realigned, the as yet but waiting to be partially gender realighned an on and on ad infinitum.
By now I suspect the ifinite complexity of the labeling in any real practical sense, would lead most of us to understand that there would be, in this system, as many gender identity labels as there are individuals alive at any one time - and not the one of them worth any more, or any less than any of the others..........and on this basis I pronounce the matter as just another small piece of evidence of a world gone mad!