Gizmodo wrote:In this case, the mass e-book removals were motivated by copyright . A company called MobileReference, who did not own the copyrights to the books 1984 and Animal Farm, uploaded both books to the Kindle store and started selling them. When the rights owner heard about this, they contacted Amazon and asked that the e-books be removed. And Amazon decided to erase them not just from the store, but from all the Kindles where they'd been downloaded. Amazon operators used the Kindle wireless network, called WhisperNet, to quietly delete the books from people's devices and refund them the money they'd paid.
I was thinking about this over the weekend and the implications of the digital age we find ourselves in. It is highly likely that we will one day deal with all kinds of data being digitally altered in the future. Not just books, but it could be digital historical information, personal information, medical information. There really is no end to the risk this exposes society to over time. I suspect some of this has already happened but over time it could be widespread.
Something to think about.
We miss you Tracie but your Spirit will always shine brightly on the Watch
Fist and Faith wrote:As each generation dies, chances for truths to be remembered are lost. The newer generations will only learn from the altered digital sources.
wayfriend wrote:The whole story is always a bit different.
Gizmodo wrote:In this case, the mass e-book removals were motivated by copyright . A company called MobileReference, who did not own the copyrights to the books 1984 and Animal Farm, uploaded both books to the Kindle store and started selling them. When the rights owner heard about this, they contacted Amazon and asked that the e-books be removed. And Amazon decided to erase them not just from the store, but from all the Kindles where they'd been downloaded. Amazon operators used the Kindle wireless network, called WhisperNet, to quietly delete the books from people's devices and refund them the money they'd paid.
That makes sense and is fair. Glad they were refunded.
SoulBiter wrote: ↑Wed Mar 08, 2023 2:56 pm
I was thinking about this over the weekend and the implications of the digital age we find ourselves in. It is highly likely that we will one day deal with all kinds of data being digitally altered in the future. Not just books, but it could be digital historical information, personal information, medical information. There really is no end to the risk this exposes society to over time. I suspect some of this has already happened but over time it could be widespread.
Something to think about.
We've been dealing with this at least going back to the Special Editions of Star Wars and its sequels. Ironically, George Lucas is a huge proponent of film preservation, to the point that there's a fan theory his constant meddling in the films was intentional trolling in order to bring the issue to light.
"You make me think Hell is run like a corporation."
"It's the other way around, but yes."
Obaki, Too Much Information
High Lord Tolkien wrote: ↑Wed Mar 08, 2023 10:07 pm
Didn't someone discover an older version of the bible in a jar in a cave a number of years ago?
And wasn't there a shitshow regarding bible rewrites?
Archeologists DID find an old book of the Bible ~ I think not too far from where the Dead Sea Scrolls were found … and the Cave was the. Cave if Horrors or something like that.
keep smiling
'Smoke me a kipper .. I'll be back for breakfast!'
Well, in 393CE the Council of Hippo chose which books belonged in the bible, and which didn't. Quite a few books, including some gospels, got the chop.
Indeed and they’re finding more and more of those that didn’t make it ~ for whatever reason I’d wager some folks went to a great deal of effort in the recording and safeguarding of many of them too.
It’s like working for government lol
keep smiling
'Smoke me a kipper .. I'll be back for breakfast!'