When Is The Use Of Force justified?

Archive From The 'Tank
Locked

When is force justified.

Only in response to coercion?
8
40%
Preemptively, to prevent a possible future coercion?
0
No votes
I trust my government to do whats best?
1
5%
Use of force is justified based on that paticular situation?
11
55%
 
Total votes: 20

User avatar
Zahir
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 1304
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 11:52 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Zahir »

I don't get that. Can't something be planned and fail?
"O let my name be in the Book of Love!
It be there, I care not of the other great book Above.
Strike it out! Or, write it in anew. But
Let my name be in the Book of Love!" --Omar Khayam
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 61942
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Post by Avatar »

Fair enough, something can indeed be planned and fail. I suppose it depends on what we think is doing the planning.

But if it was planned and failed, then it was meant to be the way it was planned. Not this way.

Then when that didn't work, it was meant to be the next plan, which also failed. And then it was meant to be the next, and so on, until it was meant to be this way.

To me, that doesn't count as it being meant to be this particular way...just meant to be whatever way happened to work first.

Not sure if I've made that understandable... :lol:

--A
User avatar
Zahir
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 1304
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 11:52 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Zahir »

We seem to be using slightly different words for something simliar.

When you say something wasn't "meant to be" I simply say "it didn't work."

The only planning I am talking about in this context is the planning of those who actually try something. For example, the Framers of the US Constitution originally planned for the runner-up in the Presidential election to be Vice President. Well, when Thomas Jefferson was John Adams' VP they found out that didn't work and the Constitution was changed.
"O let my name be in the Book of Love!
It be there, I care not of the other great book Above.
Strike it out! Or, write it in anew. But
Let my name be in the Book of Love!" --Omar Khayam
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 61942
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Post by Avatar »

:LOLS: Aha, we are looking at this from completely different angles. :D

I was thinking on a much bigger scale...like an evolutionary scale, when I say "planned" and "random." :lol:

--A
User avatar
zephyrescent
Servant of the Land
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 2:40 pm

Post by zephyrescent »

interesting ideas folks. Well use of force i think is never ever good. An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth will only leave the whole world blind and hungry. If you are a peaceful and a good person you will find alternative methods like Gandhi did in India. To commit a violent act not only hurts another living being but it deprives yourself of a certain element of purity and sanctity of life and tarnishes it.
Yea yea i know-i should've been a Lord. I did take the Oath of Peace though.
User avatar
sgt.null
Jack of Odd Trades, Master of Fun
Posts: 47603
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:53 am
Location: Brazoria, Texas
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Post by sgt.null »

so self-defense is out?
Lenin, Marx
Marx, Lennon
Good Dog...
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 61942
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Post by Avatar »

Welcome to the 'Tank Zephyrescent. Always nice to see a new Member here.

What if your violent act preserves somebody else from violence though?

--A
User avatar
Spring
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 3784
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by Spring »

I think that force should only be used when force is used against the person. The amount of force used varies with the degree of danger in each situation.

*looks around*

AH, HELP! I'M IN THE 'TANK! OH NO!

*runs*

;)
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 61942
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Post by Avatar »

:LOLS:

Do you mean as opposed to force being used against a nation Spring?

--A
Locked

Return to “Coercri”