
--A
Moderator: aTOMiC
Malik23 wrote:And the Enterprise has a room with crucial components to its warp drive, but you can't go in there to fix it without dying from radiation?? Who the hell designed that room?!?
I'm guessing that there were many details that were not explained about the parameters the Genesis scientists required in their search for an appropriate body for the next level of their experiments. I'm guessing that just any old rock wouldn't do. It had to be something specific. At least that's what I assumed and believe was implied. IMHOMalik23 wrote:I just watched this again last night because of this thread. Fantastic movie. Khan is awesome.
But a few gripes . . . why was Starfleet looking for a "dead planet" when the scientists already had one? They were doing Stage Two of the Genesis project inside a moon that was nothing but a cratered rock. And considering how rare life is, how hard could it be to find a planet without life? We have, like, 8 of them in our solar system alone! That's not even counting all the moons and asteroids. But they make it sound like this is an arduous task they've been working on for a while.
First of all we don't know the spatial relationships between Earth, Reliant's Search area and Regula 1. Even with Reliant assigned to the Genesis project we don't know just how far away she was supposed to be from Regula at the time Star Fleet ordered Enterprise to investigate. I'm willing to accept that since only a loss of communications was reported, Enterprise's proximity and status may have been perfectly appropriate to the situation. Reliant, being on assignment elsewhere, may have been a poor choice from Star Fleet's point of view, given the circumstances.Also, the Enterprise was the only ship in the quadrant???? What about the ship that *beat* them there? You know, the one Khan took over? Okay, maybe they didn't respond to Starfleets communications. But if so, shouldn't Starfleet warned the Enterprise that a rouge Starfleet ship was in the area?
And how in the world did the Enterprise become "the only ship in the quadrant" when they just left Earth on a training cruise, and they hadn't even gone into warp speed yet? The first time they go to warp speed is when they get the order to check out the Genesis situation. So there is no way they could have even left our solar system yet!
I'll give you that one, however Khan's flair for the dramatic may have accounted for the supposed delay in his realization. Frankly the entire exchange didn't take all that long from beginning to end.And if Khan has a genetically superior intellect, why did it take him so long to figure out that Chekov thought they were on Ceti Alpha 6? He tells Khan, "On Ceti Alpha 5, there was life." Khan responds, "This is Ceti Alpha 5!!!" And then he rambles for a few minutes . . . then it dawns on him that Chekov thinks this planet is Ceti Alpha 6. Well, no shit! Chekov just told you that, genetically superior superman!
Here's another point I'll concede. It is pretty unlikely that Ceti Alpha 5's new orbit would be precisely the same as that of the late Ceti Alpha 6.And why did Starfleet think this planet was Ceti Alpha 6??? Can't they count? Don't you think they'd notice that a planet was *missing* from a star system? An asteroid belt that wasn't there before? These are advanced humans exploring the galaxy, but they can don't notice fundamental changes to a star system like a planet blowing up? Come on.
[Edit: actually, if the 6th planet blew up, they would have went to Ceti Alpha 7, not 5! All they had to do was begin with the star, count outwards, and realize that the 5th planet was in fact not the 6th! Pretty easy to spot. God, that's a stupid mistake.]
Scans and life form reading were obviously impacted by the environment. We don't know that the Reliant crew specifically identified the "sand creature" as the life form they read. They even believed it may have been "a particle of pre animate matter caught in the matrix".And their tricorder picked up the life signs of this tiny sand creature in the cargo container, but it didn't pick up the life signs of 20-30 humans standing around outside????
And the Enterprise has a room with crucial components to its warp drive, but you can't go in there to fix it without dying from radiation?? Who the hell designed that room?!? Why didn't they include a little robot who could lift that thingie and do that thingamajig that Spock did? Seems like a major design flaw. Or . . . couldn't they just use the transporter to beam the necessary part in there? Come on Spock, you're the science officer! Think!
"If you can't tell the difference, what difference does it make?"
I always felt that the radiation was a side effect of the damage done, not a constant condition. Wasn't someone standing in that exact room during the inspection early in the movie?I'll give you this one too. Seems pretty like a pretty lousy design to me as well.Quote:
And the Enterprise has a room with crucial components to its warp drive, but you can't go in there to fix it without dying from radiation?? Who the hell designed that room?!? Why didn't they include a little robot who could lift that thingie and do that thingamajig that Spock did? Seems like a major design flaw. Or . . . couldn't they just use the transporter to beam the necessary part in there? Come on Spock, you're the science officer! Think!
My assumption was similar. I didn't believe there was a static "bottle" of radiation in that chamber. However with the damage caused by the battle the only way to repair the Warp drive was contained in a specific area that was prone (under certain conditions) to be flooded with lethal amounts of radiation. That is the design flaw I have a problem with.rdhopeca wrote:I always felt that the radiation was a side effect of the damage done, not a constant condition. Wasn't someone standing in that exact room during the inspection early in the movie?I'll give you this one too. Seems pretty like a pretty lousy design to me as well.Quote:
And the Enterprise has a room with crucial components to its warp drive, but you can't go in there to fix it without dying from radiation?? Who the hell designed that room?!? Why didn't they include a little robot who could lift that thingie and do that thingamajig that Spock did? Seems like a major design flaw. Or . . . couldn't they just use the transporter to beam the necessary part in there? Come on Spock, you're the science officer! Think!
"If you can't tell the difference, what difference does it make?"
I'm sure there were details not explained. But if "any old rock wouldn't do," then the device isn't very useful. Besides, it created a life-abundant planet out of a nebula. If it can do that, I think any old rock would do.I'm guessing that there were many details that were not explained about the parameters the Genesis scientists required in their search for an appropriate body for the next level of their experiments. I'm guessing that just any old rock wouldn't do. It had to be something specific. At least that's what I assumed and believe was implied. IMHO
Reliant was closer. It got there first. But then again, it left sooner, so maybe it wasn't closer. But it was the ship assigned to help out the scientists, so it seems they would have at least tried to contact them first.First of all we don't know the spatial relationships between Earth, Reliant's Search area and Regula 1. Even with Reliant assigned to the Genesis project we don't know just how far away she was supposed to be from Regula at the time Star Fleet ordered Enterprise to investigate. I'm willing to accept that since only a loss of communications was reported, Enterprise's proximity and status may have been perfectly appropriate to the situation. Reliant, being on assignment elsewhere, may have been a poor choice from Star Fleet's point of view, given the circumstances.
It's worse than that. Even if the orbit was exactly the same, there would still be a missing planet that would be obvious to any space traveling species. Or any species that could count.Here's another point I'll concede. It is pretty unlikely that Ceti Alpha 5's new orbit would be precisely the same as that of the late Ceti Alpha 6.
"If you can't tell the difference, what difference does it make?"
That point has always nagged me as well. Where did this miraculous Genesis planet come from? Just watching the sequence in the movie from Reliant's explosion to the appearance of the planet, I think many viewers could be forgiven for thinking the whole planet somehow originated from Reliant itself.Malik23 wrote:[The Genesis device] created a life-abundant planet out of a nebula.
matrixman wrote:That point has always nagged me as well. Where did this miraculous Genesis planet come from? Just watching the sequence in the movie from Reliant's explosion to the appearance of the planet, I think many viewers could be forgiven for thinking the whole planet somehow originated from Reliant itself.Malik23 wrote:[The Genesis device] created a life-abundant planet out of a nebula.
"If you can't tell the difference, what difference does it make?"
Aaargh. That means I've held the wrong assumption about the Genesis device all these years. I thought it needed a planetoid to work its ways. Oh well. Wouldn't be the first time (and surely won't be the last) that I've completely misunderstood something about Star Trek. Why is 23rd century science so hard to grasp?aTOMiC wrote: I'm guessing that the "Genesis Effect" as described in the proposal to the Federation we see in the film (and again in Star Trek III with Kirk replacing Carol Marcus in the video) reacted to whatever material was available to reorder matter in favor of it's new matrix. I have always assumed that the Genesis planet was formed from the available energy and matter found in the Nebula, of which there was an abundance. I agree that a Nebula isn't a planet or an asteroid but the aforementioned "Genesis Effect" doesn't seem to give a crap. It's going to make it's "habitable world" out of whatever it inflicts itself upon.
That's okay, MM. Apparently David Marcus didn't understand 23rd century science either. What kind of lunatic uses "Protomatter" anyway?matrixman wrote:Aaargh. That means I've held the wrong assumption about the Genesis device all these years. I thought it needed a planetoid to work its ways. Oh well. Wouldn't be the first time (and surely won't be the last) that I've completely misunderstood something about Star Trek. Why is 23rd century science so hard to grasp?aTOMiC wrote: I'm guessing that the "Genesis Effect" as described in the proposal to the Federation we see in the film (and again in Star Trek III with Kirk replacing Carol Marcus in the video) reacted to whatever material was available to reorder matter in favor of it's new matrix. I have always assumed that the Genesis planet was formed from the available energy and matter found in the Nebula, of which there was an abundance. I agree that a Nebula isn't a planet or an asteroid but the aforementioned "Genesis Effect" doesn't seem to give a crap. It's going to make it's "habitable world" out of whatever it inflicts itself upon.
"If you can't tell the difference, what difference does it make?"
Thats how I saw that as well. The room was fine but inside that thingamajig that Spock put his hands in, something was broken that was releasing radiation in the room. They could use the transporter to get the part in the room, but someone has to 'install' the new part.rdhopeca wrote:I always felt that the radiation was a side effect of the damage done, not a constant condition.I'll give you this one too. Seems pretty like a pretty lousy design to me as well.Quote:
And the Enterprise has a room with crucial components to its warp drive, but you can't go in there to fix it without dying from radiation?? Who the hell designed that room?!? Why didn't they include a little robot who could lift that thingie and do that thingamajig that Spock did? Seems like a major design flaw. Or . . . couldn't they just use the transporter to beam the necessary part in there? Come on Spock, you're the science officer! Think!
All I can say is . . . worst job in Starfleet. Who trains at the Academy all those years for a single act of warp drive repair which ends in death? And where the hell was he when they needed him?SoulBiter wrote:. . . but someone has to 'install' the new part.