danlo wrote:Well, since I'm old I still like Foundation--it was definately a step up from Cordwainder Smith in it's day. I agree it lacks depth but it had alot more depth than it's predecesors. When Dune came out it absolutely buried it and now that were have writers of the caliber of Zindell, Simmons, Daniel and Wolfe Dune is beginning to pale. I'm interested in not only Banks and May but this Harrison fellow looks worth looking into.
The genre has developed. It's frustrating that scifi/fantasy is still thought of as a light genre when there are Wolfes and Harrisons writing.
About Harrison, a quote from greatsandsf.com:
To say that Harrison's books are not cheerful is litotes carried to an almost absurd extreme. They can seem, at times, to be purely nihilistic. The folk who populate his tales are fully realized: human beings, grainy, gritty. Some are heroic, not always in the classical ways, though sometimes those too; some are ineffectual, empty, zombies; not a few are wretches. All live in times when things drift sideways, when ennui pervades, when the most important thing seems to be getting through to day's end, when entropy almost audibly sniggers, when everything seems trivial and nothing great.
For more see:
greatsfandf.com/AUTHORS/MJohnHarrison.shtml