Regardless of what one thinks of the historicity of the Bible, the Epic doesn't purport to be strictly historical (or perhaps, put another way, doesn't purport to be authentically personal). The Epic is a narrative typifying the "working out" of the religious quest: the victory over sin and death.Vraith wrote:Here is a fun thing to think on, maybe, since you used the Satan/Grendel, since there is a whole thread on Christian comparison:
Why is that "Biblical" connection thing even part of the "Epic" definition...especially in/about/for the works we're talking about?
Because honestly how much of the Bible is "Epic?"
Really, hardly any of it is.
This is why the Epic recapitulates and synthesizes all the types of writings found in the Bible (poetic, wisdom, ritual, moral, historical, genealogical, etc.)