Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:08 pm
Good choice, it's one of the best in the seriesOrlion wrote:The Legend of Zelda... NES... what? I've never played it before...

Official Discussion Forum for the works of Stephen R. Donaldson
https://kevinswatch.com/phpBB3/
Good choice, it's one of the best in the seriesOrlion wrote:The Legend of Zelda... NES... what? I've never played it before...
I've been playing it myself on the Gameboy Advance. It's my first go at it too. Someone was doing a game dump and I figured I should exploit it. I never had the original NES, though I did buy a SNES after they really came down in price. I played most of the Zelda game on that (A Link To The Past, I belive it was called), and enjoyed it for a while, but never finished it. Now that I'm playing the original, I'm finding it frustrating, and hard to figure out what to do next. I suspect this is one of those games that is more fun, (a) with a hint book, or (b) during its time when you have lots of time to kill hunting for everything.Orlion wrote:The Legend of Zelda... NES... what? I've never played it before...
Which is what I suggested by (b). (a) is currently all I have time for with games.Rigel wrote:Hint book? Never!
It's from an era when you weren't expected to have hint books... but you WERE expected to sit down with a piece of graph paper as you played so you could map things out
I don't think so (as far as saving is concerned)... to me, the strategy is to get a little stronger before doing anything else, so I killed a bunch of easy things to get the money to buy better shields and so forth... which helped out A LOT! Other than that, I try to locate the temples in the order they were "meant" to be in... this is usually done by seeing how hard the enemies are to get there.Cagliostro wrote:Which is what I suggested by (b). (a) is currently all I have time for with games.Rigel wrote:Hint book? Never!
It's from an era when you weren't expected to have hint books... but you WERE expected to sit down with a piece of graph paper as you played so you could map things out
By the way, is there a way to save the game without dying?
I think you can 'save and quit'. Or maybe I'm thinking of a different Zelda. It'd be silly to not allow saving.Cagliostro wrote:Which is what I suggested by (b). (a) is currently all I have time for with games.Rigel wrote:Hint book? Never!
It's from an era when you weren't expected to have hint books... but you WERE expected to sit down with a piece of graph paper as you played so you could map things out
By the way, is there a way to save the game without dying?
I've never played a Diablo, so I've to take your word for that. I've heard that Sacred 2 is a lot like Diablo and I've considered buying it, but Death Spank is cheaper and funnier.Cagliostro wrote:I thought Deathspank was more of a Diablo clone with a good sense of humor, and without a lot of the tedious backtracking to sell stuff (you put the items you don't want into your item grinder in your inventory and it turns into money - BRILLIANT fix to the worst parts of Diablo 1&2).
A great concept can be killed by bad execution, but I don't know anything about this game. It does sound like fun.CovenantJr wrote:Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis (PS2) - design and run a dinosaur theme park. Could any game possibly sound more fun?
Uncharted 2 came free with the system when it was purchased, and while I like Tomb Raider-y action, I usually don't get too excited about them these days. I do have to say that this game is definitely above par, and has several memorable moments littered throughout. The game magazine I read gave it a 10 out of 10, which is the first time I saw such a high score. I don't think I'd go that far, though - maybe a 9 out of 10, particularly because the last chapter became particularly tedious when it should have been ramping up the excitement and fun. But the "Holy crap!" moments are dosed out pretty well, so I would recommend it.CovenantJr wrote: I was tempted by Sonic & Sega All-Stars Racing (for Mario Kart-esque hijinks) and Uncharted 2 (for Tomb Raider-y action) but settled on the above instead.
Reviews seem good, so hopefully it's a winner. If not, I haven't wasted much money.Cagliostro wrote:A great concept can be killed by bad execution, but I don't know anything about this game. It does sound like fun.CovenantJr wrote:Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis (PS2) - design and run a dinosaur theme park. Could any game possibly sound more fun?
It's good to hear thoughts from someone who's played it and isn't a professional reviewer. Thanks. It's pretty cheap, so that might be my next purchase.Cagliostro wrote:Uncharted 2 came free with the system when it was purchased, and while I like Tomb Raider-y action, I usually don't get too excited about them these days. I do have to say that this game is definitely above par, and has several memorable moments littered throughout. The game magazine I read gave it a 10 out of 10, which is the first time I saw such a high score. I don't think I'd go that far, though - maybe a 9 out of 10, particularly because the last chapter became particularly tedious when it should have been ramping up the excitement and fun. But the "Holy crap!" moments are dosed out pretty well, so I would recommend it.
I've still never played an Assassin's Creed game. Hmm.JazFusion wrote:Assassin's Creed Brotherhood is my addiction of choice.
I love Ezio.
The first Assassin's Creed was good, but I still think you should start with the second one. Of course, I am completely biased since the Renaissance and Italy are my favorite time period and country ever.CovenantJr wrote:I've still never played an Assassin's Creed game. Hmm.JazFusion wrote:Assassin's Creed Brotherhood is my addiction of choice.
I love Ezio.