Page 7 of 23
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 9:24 pm
by Lord Mhoram
Luci wrote: i'm sort of in the Cail camp on this one LM, sorry but the truth is that all religions "think they're right and every other one is wrong" so...to point the finger at one and cry "arrogance" is sort of a moot point.)
Oh I totally agree. I would be against Jews praying for the conversion of Christians as well. I'm talking universally about this stuff, not just Christians.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 9:40 pm
by lucimay
i understand LM, but here's the deal,
why does anyone WHO'S NOT CATHOLIC have anything to say about what catholics say in THEIR MASS.
far as i can see, it's none of anybody else's business(jew, muslim, atheist, etc) what catholics do or say in the sanctity of their own churches during their own services!!
how come nobody's bitching about THAT??? hmmm???
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 9:46 pm
by Lord Mhoram
True, I normally don't care what Catholics do in their masses, but when they start praying about the spiritual lives of others, then that becomes an issue in my mind. Righteous indignation and all that.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 9:58 pm
by danlo
Ok I'll make the world a deal--if you can convince me that you don't believe hell, and that your prime goal in life is peace, love and happiness (for all-no exceptions)-- then you can pray for me
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:10 pm
by Dromond
Cail wrote:If you say so LM. I believe my beliefs are the way to my salvation, and I pray for others to have that salvation as well. 17,000+ posts, and you'll not find a single one in which I belittle anyone else's religious beliefs.
It's ironic that the Catholic is preaching tolerance and acceptance and the atheist (or agnostic, or whatever your beliefs are) is preaching hatred and exclusion. Must everything be a conflict? My faith is better for me, it would be selfish of me to not want to share it.
I'm totally with Mhoram and Esmer on this one.
First, Cail, notice how you capitalize only one group in the above quote.
This is (probably) an unconscious example of the arrogance and superior attitude Mhoram has been speaking of.
Second, saying you'll pray for me, or whatever, is including me in a religion I may have expressly rejected, chosen not to pe a part of, dislike, despise, whatever has been the outcome on my lifetime of thoughts on the matter.
Some in this thread have said it's being overly sensitive. I disagree.
Your reasoning of saying 'what's the harm?' leads me to this question:
Let's say I wanted a secular funeral, then you decided to disregard my wishes and did what you could to make it a Christian affair.
What does it matter?
Your enlightened hope for my salvation supercedes my lifetime.
Arrogant? You betcha.
And Lucimay, your saying that the Jews have no right to be critical of what the Catholics say about them behind closed doors ignores 1000+ years of anti-Semitism, what they did say about them,in secret and out in the open, and all the agony bestowed upon many of their race by this same group.
Praying that they join this group is too much not to respond to. (I'm not a Jew,and I hope I'm not appearing to speak for the Jews,I'm giving my opinion only.)
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:19 pm
by DukkhaWaynhim
Except that the fundies of any religion will try and sell you on the idea that peace, love, and happiness isn't good enough unless it comes with a full dose of their Name-brand religion - and no substitutes allowed.
I take offense at the idea of the Mormon church baptizing dead people into the Mormon faith (people that were not Mormons in life, and had no inclination towards becoming so...) I find that worlds different than muttering a prayer under my breath right before I go to bed for the enlightenment of those that don't know the joy of Christ. But then again, I'm Catholic, so I'm biased toward giving other Catholics the benefit of the doubt, and not doing so for Mormons.
The Jews felt the need to publicly disapprove of the reassertion of the Latin mass, because the Catholics felt the need to make that reassertion public. It's all posturing.
dw
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:30 pm
by Dromond
There's a difference. In my post I said: I'll pray for you. Here is where I'm being included in something I may have expressed my lack of desire,or maybe even vehemence against.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:56 pm
by Cail
Uhhh Dromond, Catholic is a proper noun, atheist is not. That's why it wasn't capitalized while Hindu, Jew, Catholic, and Muslim all were.
Dromond wrote:Your reasoning of saying 'what's the harm?' leads me to this question:
Let's say I wanted a secular funeral, then you decided to disregard my wishes and did what you could to make it a Christian affair.
Then I'd be an asshole, but that's not at all what's been suggested, so that's one mother of a straw man.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:58 pm
by Lord Mhoram
Not a strawman at all. You insist you'll pray for him even if he is completely against it. Ergo, it would be perfectly feasible for you to hypothetically go against his wishes regarding a funeral.
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:03 am
by Dromond
I disagree that Atheist is common while Catholic is proper, but anyway, there is no straw man.
Tell me the difference of praying for me alive and dead, when your experience tells you I wouldn't appreciate either.
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:03 am
by Cail
I see, so me praying for someone without their knowledge is the same as taking their body, subjecting it to a physical ritual, then permanently interring it in a manner contrary to their beliefs and wishes?
Riiiiiiiggghht. That's definitely not a straw man.

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:06 am
by Dromond
And I'm not saying anything about praying without my knowledge!
Would you read my posts?
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:06 am
by Lord Mhoram
Firstly, it's perfectly clear here that we are talking about praying for someone with the person's knowledge, even if they are against it (you used me as an example, and we are currently considering Dromond). Secondly, you insist that you are concerned with the well being of the souls of everyone. Isn't the burial service a religious one for Christians? Isn't that considered part of the process of death and mourning for Christians? If so, it is analogous to prayer in some fundamental way.
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:14 am
by Cail
Why Dromond, neither you nor LM have bothered to read mine. A funeral is absolutely not the same as private prayer, even if you are aware that I'm doing it. Please explain to me what harm is done if someone of a different faith prays for you. And you haven't addressed the fact that I have capitalized every other faith I've mentioned. Pretty weak argument if you've got to resort to attacking my spelling, and I'd refer you to your post, "Would you read my posts?"
Furthermore LM, you're one to talk about arrogance. I've consistently stated that I don't believe that other religions are lesser than mine. Yet you keep telling me that's not what I'm saying and/or not what I mean. I believe that is the textbook definition of arrogance.
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:15 am
by Lord Mhoram
Plus, last time I went to a Christian funeral, the point of it was to pray for the deceased.
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:19 am
by Lord Mhoram
Cail,
I'm not being arrogant. You are being bullheaded. Answer me this question then: You are praying or would pray for the souls of adherents to non-Christian faiths, so that they would convert to Christianity in order that they may achieve salvation, right? Logical leap: They wouldn't achieve salvation (or perhaps the method of salvation that is best) if they weren't being prayed for by Christians. Another logical leap: Their adherence to their faith does not meet the standards of achieving salvation that Christianity has set. I am not saying that you feel this way personally, but this ideology smacks of a ranking of faiths. One gets you to Heaven. The other doesn't do it sufficiently, so we have to pray they convert to our more enlightened faith.
And neither I nor Dromond is saying there would be "harm" done. And he did address the capitalization issue, btw.
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:21 am
by Cail
Your logical leap is false, which voids everything after.
How is stating my beliefs bullheaded?
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:24 am
by Lord Mhoram
Tell me how it is false.
You are being bullheaded when you say I am wrong and refuse to say why.
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:27 am
by Cail
What part of, "I don't care what you have faith in or if you have faith" and, "Catholicism is the best religion for me, it might not be for you", are you not getting?
I've told you why I believe you're wrong over and over, you just don't seem to care.
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:29 am
by Lord Mhoram
You don't care what faith we have? Really? Might as well stop those prayers for conversion then, right? As for the "Catholicism is right for me, might not be right for you," that is not Catholic dogma so it does not pertain to the topic of the thread, but I'll take a crack at that anyway: You might say that, but if you are praying for a non-Catholic's soul because that soul is somehow in danger because he is not a Catholic...well then, whose faith is superior in your mind?