Page 77 of 103

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:57 pm
by balon!
The only thing I ever sent, was really a thank you to him for Saltheart, who had a very specific and large affect on me when I was in middleschool, and he wrote back via email to tell ME thanks.

:biggrin:

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:05 pm
by dlbpharmd
Anthony Buren: Is the Worm a part of the Earth or is the Earth simply built upon the Worm? More to the point can you command the Worm by drinking the Blood of the Earth? If so why wouldn't Linden or the Elohim simply command the Worm never to rouse?

I could tell you that the Worm is an inherent part of the Earth's creation--which it is. But I find it more useful to think of such things in symbolic terms. Consider the Worm as a symbol of Death. If you had the Power the Command, would you use it to command Death to simply "stop happening"? If you did, the outcome might surpass your worst nightmares. Disasters of astonishing magnitude result from messing with The Way Life Works. Witness the horrors that have arisen because individuals decided that the Laws of Life and Death shouldn't apply--"just this once." Damelon was wise to do everything in his power to keep people away from the EarthBlood.

(03/05/2008)

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:22 pm
by Relayer
A number of interesting answers in today's GI, including another post from Mr. Worthington and SRD's response... but I found this one intriguing:
Spoiler
["Asked about the Theomach's motivations, SRD"]Sorry. No spoiler here. <grin> (Although I’m going to post this under “spoilers,” just to be on the safe side.) The Theomach is gone from the story, so it's at least theoretically safe to talk about him[/quote]
But there IS a spoiler of sorts: that the Theomach won't be reappearing in the last two books.

I'd guess that means that we won't be returning to the Isle (which isn't surprising). Does it also mean that Brinn/Theo/Guardian won't be showing up again? That was at least possible. Of course, it's also possible that SRD is being coy... the Theomach *himself* won't reappear but the Guardian might.

The rest of the reply, which is also interesting:
["SRD"]the point that seems most important to me is: the Theomach did NOT go back in time; certainly not to replace a specific Guardian. When Linden encounters him, he is occupying his natural place in his own history, as well as in the history of the Insequent, the Land, and the Earth. As for why: did I not mention often enough that the Insequent have an old and bitter grudge against the Elohim? Many of the Insequent are driven by a desire to prove themselves against the Elohim; to exceed by skill and knowledge what the Elohim get merely by existing. Simply defeating and replacing an Elohim is the greatest feat any Insequent has ever accomplished, no matter how static the role of the Guardian may appear in retrospect.[/quote]
[Edit: PLEASE Spoiler any FR spoilers if you're going to discuss it here...-jay]

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:09 pm
by aTOMiC
Nate in Atlanta: Stephen,

I've been reading the Thomas Covenant series since the early 80s, and have long been bugged by one issue: The main characters, Thomas and Linden, go for days, weeks -- months even! -- without changing their clothes.

Don't they start to stink? Or does The Land possess even greater powers than we know about?

Thanks,
Nate


Well, of *course* they start to stink. But this is obviously not a subject on which I've focused much narrative attention. Why? Because it takes up too much storytelling space. And because, well, where does it end? Do you want to know *every* time a character takes a leak, or is every *other* time enough?

However, my characters *do* either change or wash their clothes--when they can. (Not so much the people of the Land, I admit: we seldom hear that one of them has done something to get cleaned up.) I could cite examples; but I hardly think they're necessary.


(03/19/2008)
I LOVE this question and I equally love the answer.
I'm just annoyed I didn't think to ask this myself. :-)

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:26 pm
by wayfriend
Relayer, you should take it up in the FR related GI questions topic in the FR forum...

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:26 pm
by Cameraman Jenn
HAHAHAHAHA! That's awesome. Julie and Heatherly asked him a question about TC's underwear but I can't remember if it was when he was on the show as Higgins O'Higgins or as himself. :P

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:46 am
by Sunbaneglasses
SRD vaguely hinted and teased all around one of my questions. I am up to two!

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 3:53 pm
by Relayer
Monumental Guilt Beyond the Ken of Human Understanding: Does Lord Foul like sushi? Okay, has he ever possessed someone, ate sushi during the possession and decided that he in fact liked it? Are there any sushi chefs in the Land? Why not?
SRD, while in possession of the Chopsticks of Law, wrote:Lord Foul, being the DESPISER, *despises* sushi. There are no sushi chefs in the Land. In a distant region of the Earth, however, an obscure people worship sushi. Sushi chefs are the high priests of that religion. Sadly, they are too self-absorbed to have any effect on the outcome of larger events.

Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:30 pm
by aTOMiC
Just read that in the GI, Relayer. Awesome. Loved the question REALLY loved the response. :-)

Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:06 pm
by Relayer
I wonder what that race is called and how I can visit them.

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 12:57 pm
by drew
So, uh, what's the proper protocol, if you get an email from SRD instead of a response posted on his website?

The email asks not to reply, so do I just ignore it?
How do I show forth my gratitude?

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:00 pm
by Cagliostro
drew wrote:So, uh, what's the proper protocol, if you get an email from SRD instead of a response posted on his website?

The email asks not to reply, so do I just ignore it?
How do I show forth my gratitude?
I dunno. Reply back to the email and ask him. :D

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:27 pm
by drew
I think I'm just going to drive to his house and ask him what I should do.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:25 pm
by Relayer
SRD wrote:LF is in hiding. Esmer doesn't even know where he is. This is consistent with the Despiser's new strategy as he has deployed it throughout the story so far. Doubtless he has read "Desecration Through Manipulation," a sort of self-help book for people who want to feel superior and do harm while remaining safe from the humiliating defeats they've suffered in the past.
:LOLS:

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:41 pm
by wayfriend
In the Gradual Interview, Donaldson wrote:2) Your speculations about Kastenessen's mortal lover are interesting. I can't say that I've ever thought about her in those terms. And I probably never will. I'm content with my original assumption that Giantish men are defended from the merewives by their gift of tongues. (It's often difficult to seduce someone who understands what you're *really* saying.)
Okay, did anyone pick up that the gift of tongues defended the Giants from the merewives? Even Pitchwife says, "Perhaps the merewives have no desire for Giants, as they have none for women."

Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 10:18 am
by Revan
I'm James Douglas, hose questions were mine; and I found the questions he didn't answer ***far*** more interesting that those he did... I posed several questions that relate to my theories on the Last Chronicles... Not only did he not want these questions answered, but he didn't want my questions *shown*. I find this interesting, and he is correct, even that is a none answer in a way.

I confess, when I asked him these questions, I really wasn't hoping for a direct answer; any kind of reply would satisfy me. The biggest things can be found in the smallest details. I understand completely his notion to not answer or display the rest of my questions, and respect it entirely.

Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 4:25 pm
by dlbpharmd
wayfriend wrote:
In the Gradual Interview, Donaldson wrote:2) Your speculations about Kastenessen's mortal lover are interesting. I can't say that I've ever thought about her in those terms. And I probably never will. I'm content with my original assumption that Giantish men are defended from the merewives by their gift of tongues. (It's often difficult to seduce someone who understands what you're *really* saying.)
Okay, did anyone pick up that the gift of tongues defended the Giants from the merewives? Even Pitchwife says, "Perhaps the merewives have no desire for Giants, as they have none for women."
I've never picked up on that either, WF.

Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 5:01 pm
by wayfriend
Posting the whole thing, but the thing about the Ravers caught my eye. It seems we have another clue about their origins.
In the Gradual Interview was wrote:Dale Cebula: Mr Donaldson,

HUGE fun of your work...I started reading Covenant in about the 8th grade, and I'm 37 now! I have a few silly questions for you.

Do any regular people live (or ever lived) in the Lower Land? I know the Giants did before they were all slain, but are there any villages in this part of the world? The names of the regions suggest that no right thinking person would do so, but where the "Spoiled Plains" always spoiled?

Have any of the "regular" people in the Land ever done anything wicked or hateful? Kevin, Elena, etc made big errors, but they do not do things out of sin or greed or whatever. I believe this to be due to the connection to Earthpower, and also has something to do with this being a story about Covenant and Linden and not necessarily about the folk of the Land. Just curious.

Finally, can you think of a reason why Foul did not just "dive" into the earthpower prior to Berek forging the Staff of Law. It seems that the reason he did so prior to TWL is because the STaff was gone. Again, that would make for a silly story in the first trilogy, but anyway.

PS--I am a medieval history major and I have to take issue with some GI comments you made about the Middle Ages lacking progress. Or is that just my vanity?!?! LOL
  • Please keep in mind that I'm working without a net (i.e. a story "bible") here. As I've said many times before, in general I only invent what I need. But with that proviso....

    Starting from the "known" (the text), we can make some deductions based on, say, the history of the One Forest. The One Forest was decimated by *people*--an act which in sheer scale could be considered a desecration--and they had to come from SOMEwhere. Since they didn't intrude through Doom's Retreat (that happened later, and when it did, the Upper Land was already inhabited--if sparsely, perhaps), and since the various mountain ranges naturally discourage migration, it seems likely that these people arrived from the sea, or along the coasts. Therefore the Lower Land must once have been inhabited by humankind. (I think we can assume that the Spoiled Plains weren't "spoiled" until after LF established himself in Ridjeck Thome.) And these people must have been capable of considerable darkness or malice, since they eventually gave rise to the Ravers.
    However, even back then the Sarangrave and Lifeswallower must have been toxic. The Defiles Course derives its poisons, at least in part, from the banes buried under Mount Thunder; and those banes--according to the text--were there from the Earth's very beginning. As a result, much of the Lower Land would have been comparatively unwelcoming. So it seems natural that people would slowly move toward the Upper Land, hacking and burning as they migrated.

    Does that answer your question?

    As for LF's use of Earthpower to bring himself back after his defeat in the first trilogy: why would he do such a thing if he didn't have to? Being the Despiser and all, he can't possibly *enjoy* things like Earthpower. (I like to picture him puking at the taste of aliantha.)

    As "a medieval history major," you would certainly know more about the Middle Ages than I do. But surely they haven't been called "the dark ages" for nothing?

    (04/23/2008)
There you have it: The Ravers were pirates!

Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 5:07 pm
by aTOMiC
drew wrote:So, uh, what's the proper protocol, if you get an email from SRD instead of a response posted on his website?

The email asks not to reply, so do I just ignore it?
How do I show forth my gratitude?
The best show of gratitude you can make is to do as he requests and not respond. :biggrin:

Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 3:13 pm
by wayfriend
Does the GI seem broke to anyone else?

Every time I click "new, view online", it tries to show all questions from 2/22/2004 to present. Takes a LONG time, too. The new, view as RTF gives me the same stuff. Ditto if I click April, online or RTF.