Kevin's Watch

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 6:09 am**

Wait, we can post porn now?

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:31 am**

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:51 am**

one nip does not porn make.

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:57 am**

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:13 am**

Emotional Leper wrote:Wait, we can post porn now?

I've censored it.

A Gunslinger wrote:one nip does not porn make.

True and if I considered it artistic or thought that it were were essential to your message, Guns, then I'd leave it.

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:18 am**

Truly....I didn't even NOTICE the nippy until EL "pointed" it out. I though the cannibalism reference was arty n' fun.

My god...am I so old that I don't even notice a bare nipple anymore? Santa...bring me some nudity awareness, or a (female) bisexual elf or somethin'!

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:19 am**

fascist!

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:26 am**

Esmer wrote:
fascist!

You can't be talking about me since as a mod of this forum for...what...a year (???) that's the first post I've ever altered.

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:35 am**

Based on the findings of the report, my conclusion was that this idea was not a practical deterrent for reasons which at this moment must be all too obvious.

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:42 am**

Seareach wrote:
Esmer wrote:
fascist!
You can't be talking about me since as a mod of this forum for...what...a year (???) that's the first post I've ever altered.

Of course he's not! Es would never be so silly...would he?

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:44 am**

A Gunslinger wrote:
Seareach wrote:
Esmer wrote:
fascist!
You can't be talking about me since as a mod of this forum for...what...a year (???) that's the first post I've ever altered.
Of course he's not! Es would never be so silly...would he?

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:45 am**

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:26 pm**

Well it was bound to come to this sooner or later, all being based in " expression" and what not. I find the news foto of Dogs above , highly disturbing and the act of the women biting herself much more tragic than her bare nipple, The combination of her cannibalistic act and her nudity tho,,evokes a whole, rather new feeling ( the two rather opposite elements never quite combined into one effect before in my remembered experiences}. Therefore the " new feeling" evoked makes it Art. The Surreal has been achieved.

I do not complain to have the dog foto removed or edited. As disturbing as it is, it evokes. To me,, the foto of nude woman biting herself works on a level or depth or realm that first spoke to me the concept " insanity". Her " insanity" brought forth an emotion from me. Success.

So, just because one poster refers to the foto as " porno" ,,its actually just a reflection of one posters ability to communicate one posters parametered ability to perceive the world. ..or..since when is a bare breast, a nipple , porno? Does the foto open the gates to all kinds of " porno" to be entered here? Well again, if that is all one sees when a nude form is presented, then that is all any one poster can make of it. Too bad so sad that the rest of us are curtailed by the limited abilities of one.Perhaps the " porno" was just a joke..??..Simply put...I'm glad I'm not a moderator. My foto album knows no such moderation..

Happy Holidays..M..

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:36 pm**

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:45 pm**

Posted: **Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:51 pm**

In re: Porn, I was joking, btw.

Kevin's Watch

A picture's worth a thousand words...