Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 5:22 pm
by CovenantJr
A Gunslinger wrote:CovenantJr wrote:A Gunslinger wrote:rape....hahahahah!
Now that's a sentence I never expected to read!
On topic...I hate Sacha Baron Cohen. He annoys me to the point of inducing indigestion and irregularity of the bowel.
I figured we are in an SRD community... why not embrace it?

Which bit of my post are you referring to? Rape or irregularity of the bowel?

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 7:58 pm
by Damelon
Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:Damelon wrote:And the Pentacostals came off looking pretty good. They accepted him for what he was.
Were they the ones he was having the dinner party with? Cause they sure weren't accepting of the lady he brought over. Really now... for as much patience as they showed Borat, you'd think they could handle a hooker.
I was surprised the dinner party went as long as it did. It would have been over for me when he brought the bag down from the bathroom.
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:11 pm
by Waddley
Damelon wrote:Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:Damelon wrote:And the Pentacostals came off looking pretty good. They accepted him for what he was.
Were they the ones he was having the dinner party with? Cause they sure weren't accepting of the lady he brought over. Really now... for as much patience as they showed Borat, you'd think they could handle a hooker.
I was surprised the dinner party went as long as it did. It would have been over for me when he brought the bag down from the bathroom.
Agreed. I was amazed when the lady went up with him to show him how to use the toilet. She's pretty much my hero.
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 10:17 pm
by Damelon
Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:Damelon wrote:Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:Were they the ones he was having the dinner party with? Cause they sure weren't accepting of the lady he brought over. Really now... for as much patience as they showed Borat, you'd think they could handle a hooker.
I was surprised the dinner party went as long as it did. It would have been over for me when he brought the bag down from the bathroom.
Agreed. I was amazed when the lady went up with him to show him how to use the toilet. She's pretty much my hero.
I was too. I thought she was going to jump back through the window though when he asked if she was the one who would clean him up.
And I agree with you about the frat boys. That was painful to watch. Goes to show that even drunken morons can go to an exclusive university. Weren't they from U.S.C.? The university must be proud.
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:20 pm
by Waddley
Humiliated Frat Boys Sue 'Borat'
Nov 10, 8:24 AM EST
The Associated Press
SANTA MONICA, Calif. -- Two unsuspecting fraternity boys want to make lawsuit against "Borat" over their drunken appearance in the hit movie.
The legal action filed Thursday on their behalf claims they were duped into appearing in the spoof documentary "Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan," in which they made racist and sexist comments on camera.
The young men "engaged in behavior that they otherwise would not have engaged in," the lawsuit says.
"Borat" follows the adventures of comedian Sacha Baron Cohen's Kazakh journalist character in a blend of fiction and improvised comic encounters as he travels across the United States and mocks Americans.
Galleries: Sacha Baron Cohen | "Borat"
The plaintiffs were not named in the lawsuit "to protect themselves from any additional and unnecessary embarrassment." They were identified in the movie as fraternity members from a South Carolina university, and appeared drunk as they made insulting comments about women and minorities to Cohen's character.
The lawsuit claims that in October 2005, a production crew took the students to a bar to drink and "loosen up" before participating in what they were told would be a documentary to be shown outside of the United States.
"They were induced to agree to participate and were told the name of the fraternity and the name of their school wouldn't be used," said the plaintiffs' attorney, Olivier Taillieu. "They were put into an RV and were made to believe they were picking up Borat the hitchhiker."
After a bout of heavy drinking, the plaintiffs signed a release form they were told "had something to do with reliability issues with being in the RV," Taillieu said.
The film "made plaintiffs the object of ridicule, humiliation, mental anguish and emotional and physical distress, loss of reputation, goodwill and standing in the community," the lawsuit said.
It names 20th Century Fox, a unit of News Corp., and three production companies as defendants.
Studio spokesman Gregg Brilliant said the lawsuit "has no merit."
The plaintiffs were seeking an injunction to stop the studio from displaying their image and likeness, along with unspecified monetary damages.
"Borat" debuted as the top movie last weekend with $26.5 million.
Being drunk doesn't turn you into a sexist bigot. You woulda had to be one from the beginning. Dudes got what they deserved, IMO.
(Or maybe there IS a link between drunkeness and anti-semitism... Maybe they can get Mel to defend them?)
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 1:24 am
by CovenantJr
Pathetic. If they're going to be bigoted losers they could at least have the balls to take it on the chin.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 3:22 am
by Waddley
CovenantJr wrote:Pathetic. If they're going to be bigoted losers they could at least have the balls to take it on the chin.
That's pretty much how I feel. Don't hide behind "They tricked me into saying how I feel!"
It's really bs, and I'm glad they got them on film saying that.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 3:38 am
by Loredoctor
CovenantJr wrote:Pathetic. If they're going to be bigoted losers they could at least have the balls to take it on the chin.
Well said.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 11:21 am
by CovenantJr
I'm pleased you both approve, but I seem to have given myself a bizarre mental image of a frat boy with his balls on his chin.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 3:15 pm
by Lord Mhoram
That just makes the segment all the funnier.
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 5:47 pm
by Zarathustra
You know, I thought the frat kids were just whiney punks, too. At first. But if he misled them, and had them sign legal papers after getting them drunk, it doesn't matter if they were bigots beforehand. There's no law against being a bigot. I don't like them, but there is the legal matter of lying to drunk people to get them to sign wavers. And all to mock Americans. Great.
And these guys aren't the only ones sueing. What about the poor peasants he took advantage of? Is it right to take advantage of some of the poorest people on the planet, lie to them, humiliate them, in an attempt to make millions? To me, that's a much greater sign of bigotry . . . on the part of the film makers. Check it out:
GLOD, Romania — The name of this remote Romanian village means "mud," and that's exactly what angry locals are throwing at comedian Sacha Baron Cohen.
Cohen used Glod's Gypsies as stand-ins for Kazakhs in his runaway hit movie, "Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan." Now offended villagers are threatening to sue the film's producers for paying them a pittance to put farm animals in their homes and perform other crude antics.
Residents and local officials in the hardscrabble hamlet 85 miles northwest of Bucharest said Tuesday they were horrified and humiliated to learn their abject poverty and simple ways were ridiculed for a movie now raking in millions at box offices worldwide.
"We thought they came here to help us — not mock us," said Dana Luca, 40, sweeping a manure-stained street lined with shabby homes of crumbling brick and corrugated iron sheeting.
"We haven't got anything here. We haven't got running water. We can't even bathe," she said. "We are poor people, but we are still people."
Nicolae Staicu, leader of the 1,670 Gypsies, or Roma, who eke out a living in one of the most impoverished corners of Romania, said he and other officials would meet with a public ombudsman on Wednesday to map out a legal strategy against Cohen and "Borat" distributor 20th Century Fox.
Staicu accused the producers of paying locals just $3.30-$5.50, misleading the village into thinking the movie would be a documentary, refusing to sign proper filming contracts and enticing easily exploited peasants into performing crass acts.
Only five villagers have jobs at a nearby sanatorium and a stone quarry, Staicu said. The rest weave baskets, grow apples, pears and plums, gather mushrooms in the dense Carpathian Mountain forests rising above the town, or raise a few scrawny chickens.
With no gas heating or indoor plumbing, most keep warm with wood stoves and drink from wells. Horse-drawn carts far outnumber automobiles on unpaved, badly potholed roads, and mangy stray dogs growl and snap at strangers. Acrid fires smolder in trash piles on the outskirts of the village, and children — their clothing worn and torn — play in yards littered with stumps, scrap metal and other bric-a-brac.
"These people are poor and they were tricked by people more intelligent than us," he said. "They took one of our 75-year-old ladies, put huge silicone breasts on her and said she was 47. Another man they filmed to look like the poorest person in the world, and one of our men who is missing an arm had a plastic sex toy taped to his stump."
"We are suing because they were not truthful," added Staicu, who said he saw parts of "Borat" and was disgusted.
"They did not film reality," he said. "We've really had enough of this."
Neither Cohen's agent in London nor 20th Century Fox's offices in Los Angeles immediately returned phone messages Tuesday from The Associated Press.
The mood in Glod, meanwhile, was tense and volatile, with crowds of angry, shouting villagers repeatedly gathering around reporters.
One man was seen slapping his sister, who had appeared in the film, and slamming the gate to his ramshackle home shut to keep her from being interviewed. At another point, a resident threatened news photographers with a stick, and another pelted their car with rocks.
People in the former Soviet republic of Kazakhstan, where the mustachioed Cohen's character hails from as a TV journalist on an adventure across America, also have decried how they are depicted in the film, whose opening scenes were shot in Glod.
Two members of a fraternity at a South Carolina university who appear making drunken, insulting comments about women and minorities also are suing 20th Century Fox and three production companies, claiming the crew liquored them up in a bar before filming and told them the movie would not be shown in the United States.
Not everyone in Glod is upset. Sorina Luca, 25, excitedly described how she was given $3.30 to bring a pig into her home and let the producers put a toy rifle into the hands of her 5-year-old daughter for one scene.
"I really liked it," she said. "We are poor and miserable. Nothing ever happens here."
But a 23-year-old woman who gave her name only as Irina said she felt bewildered and dismayed that Glod's poverty was reduced to a parody.
The smash success of "Borat," she said, just rubbed salt in Glod's collective wounds.
The film remained the No. 1 weekend draw at U.S. movie theaters for a second week, grossing $28.3 million, according to the latest figures released Monday.
"They made us put a cow in our living room, and they made it defecate and urinate in the house. Everyone's angry because they didn't pay them the way they should have," she said.
"They're making a lot of money — but they've made us a laughing stock."
www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,229323,00.html
And no, these poor peasants aren't the only ones sueing, either. The drivers ED guy says he was misled, too. There's a pattern here of lying to people, paying them a pitiful amount of money, and then taking advantage of their ignorance in order to make millions. That's really not funny. Why couldn't he get actors, pay them properly, and treat them honestly? Why take advantage of real people, lie to them, and make a parody of their very real poverty? So sweatshops are Bad, but when you're paying them $3 to
make fun of them, that's okay?
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:25 am
by hierachy
It's OK if you pay them nothing at all, IMO.
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:16 am
by Zarathustra
You're funny, James. I'll probably go see this movie. And I'll probably laugh at the starving, humiliated, poverty-stricken people who were lied to and exploited for our weekend entertainment, just like everyone else here. I just find it ironic that the same people laughing at these exploited 3rd-world peasants are the same ones making comments about American bigotry . . .
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 3:36 am
by Kil Tyme
Holy cow, just saw this movie and someone needs to add it to that other thread about Most Overrated movies! Funny in parts, but man..what a waste of time! Maybe I should say Over Hyped....big time.
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 3:42 am
by Cail
This was the 1st movie I've walked out of. Completely overrated.
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:04 pm
by High Lord Tolkien
Put me down for it being over hyped!
I just watched it last night.
Except for a few chuckles (like the final fate of the bear) it sucked.