Kevin's Watch

Loremaster wrote:I am sorry for flirting on KW. I wont do that anymore.

kevinswatch wrote:You bring up a lot of good points. Personally, I thought Esmer's topic was fine. Along with the other topics. But someone must of felt they deserved to be closed, so they're closed. I won't step on anyone's toes.

Heh, I was thinking earlier that maybe we should have some sort of Relationships Forum for all of these topics or perhaps "The Sex" Forum, or whatever, heh.

Or, dare I say it, a Spam Forum?

Heh.

I donno. Sounds like something we need to make more clear about in our rules.-jay

Vain wrote:Just to set the record straight - I locked the thread initially.

The power of authority is never more subtle and effective than when it produces a psychological “atmosphere” or “climate” favorable to the life of certain modes of belief, unfavorable, and even fatal, to the life of others. Arthur Balfour

Gil galad wrote:I really just come here to have fun and to have intercourse with the other people here. I really dont see the point of locking general discussion threads unless they degenerate to the point of seriously offending people. People are still going to want to talk about whatever they talk about whether the thread is locked or not, if not in Gen Dis where else?

CovenantJr wrote:Having recently studied his tenure as Prime Minister, I can tell you Arthur Balfour was rubbish.

Truth is not dependent upon the characters of those who speak it. Esmer