Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:34 pm
Too bad the cover on Amazon isn't a more detailed image. I was trying to see if it might be Covenant himself.
Official Discussion Forum for the works of Stephen R. Donaldson
https://kevinswatch.com/phpBB3/
I think DlbPharmd put forth its a forrestal,IrrationalSanity wrote:Too bad the cover on Amazon isn't a more detailed image. I was trying to see if it might be Covenant himself.
We don't know for certain that all the forestals are dead. It was just given as highly likely as far as we know.iQuestor wrote:OK, but why would the ghost of a dead forrestal make the cover? I mean, how much could a dead guy affect the story line? nope, I think its a blast from the past.
I agree, I'll always be partial to the DKS covers.Matrixman wrote:Haven't seen the cover, but judging by samples of Palencar's other work, I do like his style.
(However, Darrell K. Sweet will always be my sentimental choice as favorite Chronicles cover artist.)
Actually, we do know this - Caerroil Wildwood died prior to the Sunbane, the forests were subsequently destroyed by the Sunbane, which forced Caer-Caveral (the last Forestal) to Andelain, and we all know what happened to him. We have no evidence as yet that the Land has forests now, but there's no way that any forests could generate new Forestals.We don't know for certain that all the forestals are dead. It was just given as highly likely as far as we know.
Wah?!?! How come? Or is it a FR spoiler?dlbpharmd wrote:We have no evidence as yet that the Land has forests now, but there's no way that any forests could generate new Forestals.
Ok, that's fine. I just thought that one might consider the cover art to be a spoiler in itself.-jayWayfriend wrote:Jay, some people wanted to talk about the cover without getting into the FR forum and all the spoilers there.
Not a spoiler, just my opinion. New Forestals would require new Forests that exhibited sentience, significant collective power, and the knowledge of how to create a Forestal. I don't see that being possible in just 3500 years of growth.Wayfriend wrote:Wah?!?! How come? Or is it a FR spoiler?dlbpharmd wrote:We have no evidence as yet that the Land has forests now, but there's no way that any forests could generate new Forestals.
Agreed. I read the spoiler before I realized what I was doing (guess I'm too used to them from the Dissection, where I've already read the whole book...)danlo wrote:Yeah, I thought about that too, but the cover is common knowledge on the net now--cover talk is fine , but folks REALLY watch your spoliers here-I don't want to cover them up-so do subscribe to the FR forum if you want to talk spoilers.
I don't think it's so much a time factor (although we've seen no evidence of forests yet). It seems that the One Forest existed for much longer than that, and it still took an Elohim before they could create Forestals.New Forestals would require new Forests that exhibited sentience, significant collective power, and the knowledge of how to create a Forestal. I don't see that being possible in just 3500 years of growth.
Wayfriend wrote:Bump.
It's gotta be Saruman. Linden must discover how to use a ceasure to go to the Third Age of Middle Earth. And so we finally uncover why the Chronicles is so similar to The Lord of the Rings.
That's not quite what SRD's mental imagery had made me picture an Elohim as, though.Jeroth wrote:That's kastenessen on the cover, or however you spell it, the elohim who destroyed the durance.