Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2015 8:49 pm
You missed a book in your initial post - "Much ADO about Noting" by John Casson (available on Amazon - only one copy left!). John Casson is convinced that Sir Henry Neville wrote the Shakespeare plays.
I have a copy because he gave me one. JC found handwritten copies of Leicester's Commonwealth, copied secretly by Sir Henry Neville [Ref: Worsley MSS 36, 47 and 40) at Lincolnshire Archives, and I got involved as he was having trouble reading the 16th century handwriting and I can read it. I gave him quite a bit of help with that and he actually mentioned me in the acknowledgements for helping him read the annotations and for transcribing a letter of 1601 for him. He thinks that Leicester's Commonwealth was a source for Shakespeare's plays. I was more than a bit annoyed at his insistence on interpreting "in" as "ni" just because the dot above the i was over to the right of it, which it often is, as I explained to him several times!!
A comment made by Sir Derek Jacobi supporting John Casson appears on the back cover.
I see that he's since written another book on the same subject with someone else. "Sir Henry Neville, Alias William Shakespeare: Authorship Evidence in the History Plays" published in January this year.
I'm not saying I support this theory, just throwing another contender into the ring.
I have a copy because he gave me one. JC found handwritten copies of Leicester's Commonwealth, copied secretly by Sir Henry Neville [Ref: Worsley MSS 36, 47 and 40) at Lincolnshire Archives, and I got involved as he was having trouble reading the 16th century handwriting and I can read it. I gave him quite a bit of help with that and he actually mentioned me in the acknowledgements for helping him read the annotations and for transcribing a letter of 1601 for him. He thinks that Leicester's Commonwealth was a source for Shakespeare's plays. I was more than a bit annoyed at his insistence on interpreting "in" as "ni" just because the dot above the i was over to the right of it, which it often is, as I explained to him several times!!
A comment made by Sir Derek Jacobi supporting John Casson appears on the back cover.
I see that he's since written another book on the same subject with someone else. "Sir Henry Neville, Alias William Shakespeare: Authorship Evidence in the History Plays" published in January this year.
I'm not saying I support this theory, just throwing another contender into the ring.