Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2003 8:17 pm
by kastenessen
I've seen both and I have to say that the new one with Clooney is very boring, where Tarkovsky's is beautiful and full of insights regarding the human mind.
You could say that Tarkovsky's film (from 1972) come the the conclusion that there is no place like home. You can travel to the stars and conquer the Universe if you like but your loved ones, your family and even your own backyard still means the most to you. This is what the planet Solaris gives back to you, it feels what humankind needs...A very "anti-SF" message and at the time of it's release it was compared to Kubrick's 2001 as a kind of answer to that one...
The new one with Clooney definitely misses something as I see it
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2003 1:59 am
by Skyweir
then i will see if i can find Tarkovsky's film .. and give it another shot ..
i liked the "anti-sci-fi" observation .. sounds interesting ..
Re: Solaris
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2004 2:56 am
by Loredoctor
danlo wrote:This was a brave attempt in filming an excellent story by Stanilav Lem, imho, one of the greastest Sci-fi authors ever. The main prob is this movie should have been made much earlier. The trouble is that alot of previous Sci-fi movies both in space, on earth and underwater have liberally borrowed or superceded the plot device.
*The planet itself was 1 of the best actors, but there could have been some better editing in general.
I am to understand they didnt show the planet's ability to morph massive continents and bizarre organisms.
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2004 4:34 am
by danlo
That would have been a good touch!

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2004 4:51 am
by matrixman
edit
Posted: Sat May 22, 2004 3:15 pm
by duchess of malfi
Finally watched this movie last night.
It was refreshing to see so much male nudity instead of female.
I thought it was intellectually interesting, though my husband fell asleep rather quickly.
I had problems with the sound.

Between the music being louder then the dialog in some scenes, my husband's snoring, and the nonstop thunderstorms passing through, I had to keep turning up the volume. I finally figured out I could just turn on the subtitles, and then all was well.

Posted: Sat May 22, 2004 5:35 pm
by matrixman
edit
Posted: Sat May 22, 2004 7:13 pm
by Damelon
Posted: Sat May 22, 2004 8:08 pm
by A Gunslinger
I rather enjoyed Solaris. As Matrixman says, it was thought-provoking and deliberate. I find it impossible to say that I would not have made the same choices the Clooney character made, given the circumstances.
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:56 pm
by jacob Raver, sinTempter
It was really good, but it felt like an hour long story stretched out into a feature film: *** out of ****