Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:02 pm
by dANdeLION
jelerak wrote:dANdeLION wrote :
Epic Movie was the worst one I saw this year.
How bad did these guys and gals need money to actually take those roles?
If I was an up and coming actor / actress, this movie would definately not be listed on my resume.
The same group was in Date Movie, so I assume these actors and directors usually work together.
Emotional Leper wrote:You guys don't get Epic Movie. It wasn't supposed to be good. It was supposed to suck on purpose.
EM, we know that. One day, when you grow up, when you're not so insecure that you have to bandy about this place proving yourself to us, you'll realize that most of the people on this site are pretty damn smart; not as smart as you think you are, but pretty damn smart nonetheless.
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 8:27 pm
by Cagliostro
Ughhh...The Number 23 (from list on previous page). Yeah, I can understand that one. I really had potential to be especially good, the plot was swiss cheese if you gave it any thought at all. I really wanted it to be good.
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 3:18 am
by emotional leper
dANdeLION wrote:jelerak wrote:dANdeLION wrote :
Epic Movie was the worst one I saw this year.
How bad did these guys and gals need money to actually take those roles?
If I was an up and coming actor / actress, this movie would definately not be listed on my resume.
The same group was in Date Movie, so I assume these actors and directors usually work together.
Emotional Leper wrote:You guys don't get Epic Movie. It wasn't supposed to be good. It was supposed to suck on purpose.
EM, we know that. One day, when you grow up, when you're not so insecure that you have to bandy about this place proving yourself to us, you'll realize that most of the people on this site are pretty damn smart; not as smart as you think you are, but pretty damn smart nonetheless.
The fact that one complains about the use of a particular medium in a peice of art when the entire point of that piece was to exploit that medium, seems a bit strange to me.
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:44 am
by I'm Murrin
It is possible, you know, for parody to be just as terrible as any other film type. Even intentionally bad films can be unintentionally terrible, because they still have to get the bad-ness right for it to be tolerable and even amusing. (I remember watching one not long ago that was just that--supposed to be bad, but done badly--but I can't for the life of me remember which film it was.)
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:53 am
by Loredoctor
Emotional Leper wrote:The fact that one complains about the use of a particular medium in a peice of art when the entire point of that piece was to exploit that medium, seems a bit strange to me.
He said it was a bad movie. You seem to think saying that a movie is bad when it was meant to be bad is strange, so we
have to like it?
Sometimes post-modern comedies which rely upon contextualisation (read: introspection) to make themselves seem clever are really just stupid.
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:45 pm
by Cail
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."-David St.Hubbins
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:46 pm
by Loredoctor
Cail wrote:"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."-David St.Hubbins
The Patron Saint of Shoes.
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:05 pm
by Montresor
"Here lies David St. Hubbins . . . and why not?"
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:09 pm
by Cameraman Jenn
Bridge to Terabithia sucked. I watched it yesterday on cable. It was like My Girl on with role reversal.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:39 pm
by Mr. Broken
Dragon Wars, or wait no , Ok that definitely sucked enough to make this list.