Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:59 pm
by Zahir
I'll admit to being puzzled by that. I checked, saw the nomination for Danlo's Part 1 (explicitly stated as such) but saw no nomination for Part 2. If it merited two chances to vote, then it seems to be it should have been nominated twice. But then, I'll also admit to being far more disappointed than I expected, after seeing the numbers when voting closed. So perhaps my judgment isn't the most accurate.

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:49 pm
by Menolly
|G

Truthfully, I really thought more of a stink would be raised that I nominated a non-Donaldson dissection to begin with. I, personally, am really proud of how well you did.