Kevin's Watch

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:42 pm**

No pants!

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:47 pm**

no bulge either! HA!

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:03 pm**

Menolly wrote:Oh Esmer...

"Sexy Legs" Brannigan is fine.
It's dANdeLION who is missing his pants!!

I admit it. I'm too sexy for my pants.

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:04 pm**

Esmer wrote:no bulge either! HA!

True. But hey, this is a family forum.

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:23 pm**

Montressor wrote:
KiGirl wrote:now, if it were a girl with no pants, would you guys be offended?
That really depends on the girl . . .

ahhhh, good point.

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:58 pm**

Why the Todd hasn't already posted here with some juvenile innuendo is a mystery the proportions of which would baffle the combined deductive skills of Socrates, Plato, Einstein and Columbo.

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:59 pm**

the LAST thing we need is "one more thing."

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:00 pm**

In-your-endo.

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:16 pm**

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:25 pm**

The Todd wrote:In-your-endo.

Innuendo five!

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:31 pm**

Pants to cover up those gawd awful boots!

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:49 pm**

How can you can see my boots?

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:50 pm**

...and the lawdy said "Let their be pants!"

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:10 pm**

Emotional Leper wrote:
sgt.null wrote:
DukkhaWaynhim wrote:Um, are we using pants in the American or British sense?

dw
people should wear underwear. but we should not see it.
What if my underwear is my outwear?

are you some sort of super-hero?

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:11 am**

Zapp Brannigan wrote:It's not my fault I suffer from a very sexy disability.

What do I call it?

Oh yes, Sexlexia.

So, what you are trying to say is that you're too sexy for your shorts, er, pants?

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:52 am**

No pants can contain me.

Kevin's Watch

Petition For Common Decency