Yea, I really liked that one myself. Don't remember wether I preferred the first actor or the second better, but, I seem to remember they were both pretty well done. The second one was Sean Connery's son, right?CovenantJr wrote: As for decent screen renditions of Arthur/Robin, the best Robin Hood I've seen remains the 80s series, Robin of Sherwood. Not only is it darker and more mythic than other Robin Hoods, it also refers to places I actually know around Notiinghamshire, demonstrating an attention to detail that's sadly lacking in other versions.
Merlin
Moderators: Cagliostro, sgt.null
- CovenantJr
- Lord
- Posts: 12608
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 9:10 pm
- Location: North Wales
Oh, and regarding the subject of the thread the show Merlin - It's true it's nothing like the classic we are famililar with, but, if you detach yourself from the "real story" and just forget they share the names of Classic Arthur Mythos, it's not all that bad.
I Never Fail To Be Astounded By The Things We Do For Promises - Ronnie James Dio (All The Fools Sailed Away)
Remember, everytime you drag someone through the mud, you're down in the mud with them
Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...
It's about learning to dance in the rain
Where are we going...and... WHY are we in a handbasket?
Remember, everytime you drag someone through the mud, you're down in the mud with them
Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...
It's about learning to dance in the rain
Where are we going...and... WHY are we in a handbasket?
- Earthfriend
- <i>Haruchai</i>
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:32 pm
- Location: The Hills of Andelain
So why use the character names and some of the plot points from the Arthurian mythos at all, then? Why not just create something new?
I have several theories, most involving the television industry being lazy, cowardly, cynical, and far more interested in making money, rather than creating stories.
Still, a new interpretation of the Arthurian myth should indeed do just that; bring something new to the story. I'm not convinced 'Merlin' does that.
Ooo-kay. Now I'm arguing with myself over a TV series. Right. Time for a hot cuppa and a lie down...
I have several theories, most involving the television industry being lazy, cowardly, cynical, and far more interested in making money, rather than creating stories.
This is a good point - just what is the 'real story', and should it be considered something set in stone, never to be altered on pain of defenestration? Surely people have been re-interpreting older stories since The Illiad.sindatur wrote:...if you detach yourself from the "real story"...
Still, a new interpretation of the Arthurian myth should indeed do just that; bring something new to the story. I'm not convinced 'Merlin' does that.
Ooo-kay. Now I'm arguing with myself over a TV series. Right. Time for a hot cuppa and a lie down...
Stone and Sea are deep in life,
two unalterable symbols of the world;
permanence at rest, and permanence in motion;
participants in the Power that remains.
two unalterable symbols of the world;
permanence at rest, and permanence in motion;
participants in the Power that remains.
- CovenantJr
- Lord
- Posts: 12608
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 9:10 pm
- Location: North Wales
Reimaginings are fine, particularly when the source material is a loosely related clump of myths. This isn't a reimagining, though; it's an original story with old names tacked on for marketing. Maybe sindatur's right and I'd enjoy it more if I ignored the names, but I'm not sure I care enough to try, heh.
- Menolly
- A Lowly Harper
- Posts: 24089
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 12:29 am
- Location: Harper Hall, Fort Hold, Northern Continent, Pern...
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 8 times
- Contact:
If you haven't, read Lawhead's Pendragon Cycle.Earthfriend wrote:Still, a new interpretation of the Arthurian myth should indeed do just that; bring something new to the story. I'm not convinced 'Merlin' does that.
The last book in particular, Avalon, is barely connected to the rest, but the character of Myrddin Emrys is supposedly the same in it as the one in the rest of the cycle. Avalon, while IMO not the best book in the cycle, does bring something new to it.