Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:25 pm
uh oh.drew wrote:I would have read Shannara and LFB the year that they came out...but unfortunately, that was the year that I was born
Kevin's Watch
Official Discussion Forum for the works of Stephen R. Donaldson
https://kevinswatch.com/phpBB3/
just re-read the sword of shannara.....
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 9:00 pm
YES! I AM FIFTY FREAKIN ONE YEARS OLD DREW!wayfriend wrote:uh oh.drew wrote:I would have read Shannara and LFB the year that they came out...but unfortunately, that was the year that I was born
what. evah!
oh yeah...ps....
HLT i think i may have seen the book you're referring to but i can't remember what it was either.
PROBABLY BECAUSE I AM FIFTY FREAKIN ONE YEARS OLD!
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 9:02 pm
stop yelling Luci..just because YOU are hard of hearing, doesn't mean everyone else is.
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 9:09 pm
you know, this has little or nothing to do with the sword of shannara drew.drew wrote:stop yelling Luci..just because YOU are hard of hearing, doesn't mean everyone else is.
you've effectively hijacked this thread.
attention whore.
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 9:51 pm
On behalf of my fellow early-50s Watchers, let me add to the chorus...
Drew, at least we respect you more than the tripe Brooks writes. Might not be a bad idea to return the favor.
Obligatory SoS mention: A woman I was dating gave me the book. She knew I was a reader and had enjoyed the book, but had never read LOTR. She did not particularly appreciate my mockery of the book, but still ended up marrying me.
Drew, at least we respect you more than the tripe Brooks writes. Might not be a bad idea to return the favor.
Obligatory SoS mention: A woman I was dating gave me the book. She knew I was a reader and had enjoyed the book, but had never read LOTR. She did not particularly appreciate my mockery of the book, but still ended up marrying me.
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:45 pm
SD..I only tease Luci, because I'm madly in love with her, and she knows it!!
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:22 am
Everytime I read the title of this thread, I've always been filled with pity and horror on behalf of the poster 
Then again, it could be Goodkind
Then again, it could be Goodkind
Zzzzzzzzzzzz
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:22 pm
Just finished re-reading Shannara myself (again, many years since I last read it). It really is so lame when compared to SD and Tolkien. Lightweight, no real substance or depth, Tolkien ripoff. I may be contradicting myself but I found them an easy read. By the way, tried reading Robert Jordans Wheel of Time. Gave up after after several million pages. Far too detailed, too many characters. Good concept though. Just could not stay interested enough to slog my way through. And there are 12 books!!!! I think SD and Tolkien will always be the standard by which I measure fantasy books.
By the way Luci, I know what it feels like to be 51 and reading books published when I was a kid!
By the way Luci, I know what it feels like to be 51 and reading books published when I was a kid!
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:06 pm
Mubble, your animated avatar has me in stitches... I can barely manage to type!....
DRG
DRG
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:33 pm
Agreed!DukkhaWaynhim wrote:Mubble, your animated avatar has me in stitches... I can barely manage to type!....
DRG
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 10:37 pm
For HLT and lucimay
