Page 2 of 3

Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 8:43 am
by peter
I don't think a Bond film should be a gritty slice of everyday secret service realism; I think it should be an after Christmas dinner slump in front of the telly bit of slapstick fun. I really think they work better that way.

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 4:43 am
by Avatar
These days, they probably do. But they weren't intended that way... :D

--A

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:49 am
by peter
Agreed Av, but they've sort of cornered that market and it's actually not a bad one to have [though quite possibly if you deliberately tried to make them that way you'd fail miserably]. Anyway - I heard that Damon is returning to the Bourne roll for another outing, so I'll save my money for that.

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 3:49 pm
by wayfriend
I, too, prefer my Bond with a dash of tongue-in-cheek, a scruple of implausible, and a jigger of comic-book character. Otherwise, it's Bourne Identity, innit? I guess that's why I like the ones like Live and Let Die and Moonraker.

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 4:56 am
by Avatar
Live and Let Die was a great book, but I wasn't that taken with the film. And sadly, Moonraker is probably one of my least favourite.

--A

Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 7:57 pm
by aTOMiC
Avatar wrote:Live and Let Die was a great book, but I wasn't that taken with the film. And sadly, Moonraker is probably one of my least favourite.

--A

Sorry it took a year to finally read this post. AHHHHHHH!!!!!!

Okay Av. You are officially banned from the Roger Moore - James Bond fan club. :biggrin:

Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 4:54 am
by Avatar
What confuses me is why this thread is in Gen Disc instead of Flicks. :D

--A

Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 12:56 pm
by aTOMiC
Avatar wrote:What confuses me is why this thread is in Gen Disc instead of Flicks. :D

--A
I hadn't noticed until you mentioned it, Av. I don't know why. I agree that it should be. Given your gnarly Administrator lordship powers I imagine you could rectify the situation with no difficulty. :-)

Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 9:09 pm
by dANdeLION
The 1st Bond film was Casino Royale, with Bond being played by Barry Nelson. Connery was the 3rd Bond, and Dr. No was the 2nd Bond movie.

www.007james.com/articles/who_played_james_bond.php

Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 9:21 pm
by aliantha
I can move it if y'all want me to. (shrug)

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:35 am
by peter
I think we should form a pitchfork welding mob and storm the castle of the wretch who first posted it here (hope it wasn't me :biggrin: ) who will shale his fist and hurl imprecations at us from the battlements while the flames lick his heels! :lol:

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 4:45 am
by Avatar
Was Rigel...where is Rigel...it's all his fault. :D

--A

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 8:22 am
by peter
That Rigel - he's a star! ;)

Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 4:21 am
by Avatar
Oh very punny Peter, very punny indeed. :lol:

--A

Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 7:03 am
by peter
:biggrin: I thought so Av.

Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:10 pm
by aTOMiC
aliantha wrote:I can move it if y'all want me to. (shrug)
Please. By all means. I think dAN will accept it into the flicks forum with glee. :biggrin:

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 12:31 am
by aliantha
Okey dokey.

If y'all had mentioned this a couple of weeks ago, I could've poked Rigel in person. Too bad you missed your opportunity. :twisted:

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 12:53 am
by dANdeLION
aTOMiC wrote:
aliantha wrote:I can move it if y'all want me to. (shrug)
Please. By all means. I think dAN will accept it into the flicks forum with glee. :biggrin:
Oh, I'll take it; but not with Glee. Glee belongs in TV Shows

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 1:01 am
by dANdeLION
For those of you who want Glee: kevinswatch.ihugny.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=21973

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 1:16 am
by dANdeLION
I've never watched Glee; I doubt it would interest me.