Page 13 of 26

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:23 am
by emotional leper
Between him and Wilford Brimley, the Walruses are replacing us all!

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:44 am
by Wyldewode
Is it evolution? Or is it devolution? 8O

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:00 am
by emotional leper
Wyldewode wrote:Is it evolution? Or is it devolution? 8O
There's always convergent evolution.

And the Spice.

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:12 am
by DukkhaWaynhim
Old Spice? :lol:
Can you imagine the Arrakeen wars being fought over Old Spice? :)

dw

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:15 am
by Wyldewode
Spice must flow. :D

Come to think of it, Jamie does resemble a Navigator. . . :P

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:34 am
by emotional leper
DukkhaWaynhim wrote:Old Spice? :lol:
Can you imagine the Arrakeen wars being fought over Old Spice? :)

dw
Wyldewode wrote:Spice must flow. :D

Come to think of it, Jamie does resemble a Navigator. . . :P
Why did I just have a distinct mental image of Egon saying, "Don't cross the streams?"

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 10:49 am
by sgt.null
Image

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 1:32 pm
by emotional leper
Image

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:02 pm
by Wyldewode
Total protonic reversal! :biggrin:

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:29 pm
by DukkhaWaynhim
"But you said never cross the streams...!"

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:55 pm
by emotional leper
Spice == Old Spice
Bruce Campbell == Muad'dib

What else?

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:15 pm
by DukkhaWaynhim
Whenever you picture epic scenes from the story - like Paul's first riding of a Worm, the betrayal of Paul's father, or Muad d'ib's walking out of the great desert - you have to mentally insert the Old Spice whistle jingle. :)

...and of course all those hot Bene Gesserit chicks would have to groupie-up on anyone who uses the 'Spice. :lol:

dw

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:23 pm
by Wyldewode
Image

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:26 pm
by emotional leper
Yea, and Truly, the desecration of Frank Herbert's corpse that began when his son and Kevin J. Anderson began ******* it in their first stumblings into necrophilia and beating of dead horses is now complete.

I hope we're proud of ourselves.

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:31 pm
by Wyldewode
I can't say. . . I can't even see what I posted. I've been blinded. . . :(

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:40 pm
by emotional leper
Wyldewode wrote:I can't say. . . I can't even see what I posted. I've been blinded. . . :(
Dammit, ~Lyr, what have I told you about NOT staring directly at the Stone Burner while it's firing? :P

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:42 pm
by DukkhaWaynhim
Yeah, the non-original authors have pushed the original (great) ideas into that unfortunate commercial space where the market inadvertently ends up supporting/encouraging them - at least until we find out that they should be beaten for their sins of mediocrity. But, let's face it, any effort only sullies the unachievable art/perfection of the original trilogy. David Lynch still breathes - even though he is solely responsible for my choosing against reading the trilogy until about 10 yrs ago, when I found out how badly he had missed the mark. I still have a morbid fascination for his movie, because even though it is but a shadow, some of the imagery is still spot on - but that may be a chicken-egg issue of mine because I saw the Lynch movie before I read the books...

dw

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:46 pm
by Wyldewode
Tsukasa Logged Out wrote:
Wyldewode wrote:I can't say. . . I can't even see what I posted. I've been blinded. . . :(
Dammit, ~Lyr, what have I told you about NOT staring directly at the Stone Burner while it's firing? :P
Sowwy. . .

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:47 pm
by emotional leper
Trilogy?

There are 6 books...

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:48 pm
by Wyldewode
It's a handy term. . . :P