Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:46 am
Because nobody knows what my actions are...Loremaster wrote:I don't see anyone getting upset at our resident assassin's actions (or his existence, for that matter).
Kevin's Watch
Official Discussion Forum for the works of Stephen R. Donaldson
https://kevinswatch.com/phpBB3/
Pantheon 2.0 - Rules and Comments Thread
Page 124 of 206
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 5:38 am
But we're not dealing with the Nazis, USSR (who weren't evil, anyway) . . . and I don't think I don't want the game to be like real life: We're Gods and this is fantasy.Bhakti wrote: It doesn't work this way in rl, where it's even more important to keep evil at bay. The good guys know that they can't just snuff out people, even the ones they know to be evil, without becoming evil. And then there's the fear of war. And so we have Nazi Germany, the USSR, communist China, and on and on.
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 5:46 am
Black.
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:59 am
Orange. 
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:11 am
I'm not following . . .
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:11 am
Hmmmm ... cousin Nor, do YOU trust you more than you trust ME?Murrin wrote:Knowing that most of the time Nor Yekith would stand to gain more by saying out of trouble--which is something that holds for all of us unless we reach a point where we can feel confident of withstanding opposition--I'd still negotiate. I'd even trust Nor to hold to his word more than I do Astavyastataa.
Of course, the game has moved beyond that stage now, where Nor is concerned.
Bhakti wrote:Black.
Balon wrote:Orange.
Me either ... but is seems nicely CHAOTIC!!Loremaster wrote:I'm not following . . .
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:24 am
Me neither.Loremaster wrote:I'm not following . . .
But as a loyal GATORS!!! fan, whenever I hear
I must counter with a hearty and enthusiastic...Balon wrote:Orange.
BLUE!!!
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:54 pm
Grey, obviously
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:35 pm
Gold.
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:11 pm
Argothoth wrote:Grey, obviously
Ah...the veil has been lifted from my eyes with these last two. In that case...Jove wrote:Gold.
Spectrum
:::although how black relates to Bhakti, or orange to Adomorn, I still don't understand:::
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:50 pm
I dont understand it either. But I didnt want to be left out. 
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:04 pm
somewhere, in some thread or another (they all run together in my dreamy brain) Nor and Bhakti were arguing, and Bhakti said something to Nor like "black is white with you" or "white is black to you" or some such thing.
SO...
when bhakti said simply "black" that was a direct reference to that earlier post.
NOW do ya'll get it?
SO...
when bhakti said simply "black" that was a direct reference to that earlier post.
NOW do ya'll get it?
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:07 pm
No, that was Adomorn, I believe. I was simply saying "black" to see if Loremaster would say "white." 
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:00 am
Xar ruined my night yesterday when he said that chances are there'll be a Bhakti in the third age. I hardly slept.Bhakti wrote:No, that was Adomorn, I believe. I was simply saying "black" to see if Loremaster would say "white."
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:15 am
What?? When?? Where???Loremaster wrote:Xar ruined my night yesterday when he said that chances are there'll be a Bhakti in the third age. I hardly slept.
:::dances with joy:::
(although I am still not ready for the Second Age to end)
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:26 am
oh close enough.Bhakti wrote:No, that was Adomorn, I believe. I was simply saying "black" to see if Loremaster would say "white."
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:29 am
What he didn't tell you is that YOU would have to be Bahkti!!Loremaster wrote:Xar ruined my night yesterday when he said that chances are there'll be a Bhakti in the third age. I hardly slept.Bhakti wrote:No, that was Adomorn, I believe. I was simply saying "black" to see if Loremaster would say "white."
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:32 am
Astavyastataa Kadna wrote:What he didn't tell you is that YOU would have to be Bahkti!!
That's a horrible thing to say!Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:38 am
:::chuckles:::Loremaster wrote:Astavyastataa Kadna wrote:What he didn't tell you is that YOU would have to be Bahkti!!
I knew the Pantheon had to always have one of the line of Bhakti!!
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:42 am
Depends. If we simply give up on the Second Age, there won't be a Bhakti in the Third. If Eiran is literally destroyed, or all inhabitants destroyed beyond their ability to follow deities, then I'm sure another of the Bhakti line will show up in the Third Age. 