Kevin's Watch

so...has anyone noticed yet that the FBH thread is where we all hang out and jabber. Jenn holds court in the FBH thread. and, in fact, we seem to be talking LESS AND LESS about FBH!!

jenn....do you have any hot photos of Lord Mormon in a compromising position? how 'bout Expert Lev? (shut up i do not have a crush)

I don't have any compromising pictures of those boys but I could try to get some for you. Lord Mormon/Seth just had a b'day on the fourth. This is the first year in about three years that we didn't throw a joint b'day party for us. I will see him tomorrow though so I will see what I can do.

I will for sure have some more compromising pic of SRD!!!! as will YOU LUCIMAY!!!

for no apparent reason

kevinswatch.ihugny.com/phpBB2/viewtopic ... ight=pants






this is hilarious....notice, as the thread degenerates, some similar events...

Cov Jr keeps his finger on the dele

jay backs out of the room.

totally...that's hysterical.

Ahhh yes, the glorious Pants Forum.

CovenantJr wrote:Please don't talk about licking meat

I love you Covenant. Really, I do.

well, my "pants" happen to be bright red high cut bikini ones with little cartoon pandas on them...

Lucimay wrote:so...has anyone noticed yet that the FBH thread is where we all hang out and jabber. Jenn holds court in the FBH thread. and, in fact, we seem to be talking LESS AND LESS about FBH!!

What thread is this again?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?

So, keeping with the "theme" (ie: non FBH banter).

I'd like to say a:

HAPPY BIRTHDAY to Jenn
Girl, you've got the BEST birthday present ever (ie: a visit from "royalty")

GOOD LUCK to Luci (but ya don't need it).

And to everyone else I send coz I'm in a good mood today, so i'm going to share the love around!

Thank you Seareach and you are right!!! I do get the bestest most wonderous amazing fabulicios b'day prezzie EVER!!!

Loremaster wrote:

LOL! Well said!

what the hell does that mean?

Lucimay wrote:what the hell does that mean?

Now now, Lucimay. Don't curse. It's no more off-topic than the rest of this thread.

Loremaster wrote:

Lucimay wrote:what the hell does that mean?

Now now, Lucimay. Don't curse. It's no more off-topic than the rest of this thread.

i didn't comment on whether it was on or off topic. i asked what it meant.
i'm serious. i don't know what it means. is that stupid of me? sorry.

I believe it's the British equivalent of the middle finger....but I could be wrong.

Lucimay wrote:i didn't comment on whether it was on or off topic. i asked what it meant.
i'm serious. i don't know what it means. is that stupid of me? sorry.

It is a post-modern, co-narrative artwork. I really cannot elucidate its meaning as I subscribe to the 'death of the author' paradigm. However, I am hoping that there is a sort of neo-constructivist activity, or sans-nihilist adoption of gestalt meaning. Meaning - pardon the pun - that the work embodies a hyper-interactive, or Jungian-type 'merging of parasymbolism'.

Peanut-butter jelly time?

Cameraman Jenn wrote:I believe it's the British equivalent of the middle finger....but I could be wrong.

i do believe you might be right Jenn!

Wow Loremaster ...you speak politese.... I thought only Republican Politicians were fluent in that language

Cameraman Jenn wrote:I believe it's the British equivalent of the middle finger....but I could be wrong.

I am deeply offended if you believe that the great Winston Churchill intended for his gesture to be equivalent to the 'middle finger'. There is much footage, for instance in the campaign in Africa, where is 'two fingers raised' gesture co-occurs with Allied victory against fascism. In that regard, any substantial historial analysis will make explicit a strong correlation between his gesture and victory. Hence, the image is explicitly positive, and I might add, has a certain tone of respect.