Kevin's Watch

What may work for a
Dedicated curmudgeon
Is not for all folks

Dam! I miss a ton of people who posted on this thread...

helloooooooooooo...now you see me now you don't...

Did anybody hear something?



--A

Hi Elfy!!


And I wish MM would come back.

...and Spring! Gosh, he'd be a man by now!

Seareach wrote:...and Spring! Gosh, he'd be a man by now!

Seareeeech!

Cameraman Jenn wrote:Ok, did my own sneaky and if I am correct he's posted on the net a few weeks ago. Not gonna tell you how or why or where. I'm also not going to try to contact him through it because my sneaky was very tricksy and again might not be him but I'm pretty sure it is. I'll try to contact him through his publicly accepted venues that were exchanged with me despite the fact that he may remain incommunicado. It also looks like he's doing ok.

If true I'm relieved. Anything can happen to any of us at any time and the rest of us may never know more than "he/she just stopped posting".
I miss MM but if he doesn't return I'm fine with just knowing he's okay.

peter wrote:

Seareach wrote:...and Spring! Gosh, he'd be a man by now!

Seareeeech!

what? hang on... I'm I'm sufficiently confused (which is an easy thing to do--confuse me, that is). You're not Spring, are you...

LOL

Seareach wrote:

peter wrote:

Seareach wrote:...and Spring! Gosh, he'd be a man by now!

Seareeeech!

what? hang on... I'm I'm sufficiently confused (which is an easy thing to do--confuse me, that is). You're not Spring, are you...

Well - lets do a bit of Sherlock Holmes here. 'Gosh He'd be a man now!' implies i) he was other than a man before, ii) an element of suprise at the rapid passage of time and iii) an interest in Spring's new found 'manness'.

In the case of i) I assumed he was a boy preveously that was about to make the transition to manhood and that this had aroused a pefectly understandable feminine interest in him (hence my mock disaprooving 'Seareeech!' (had no emoticons to make my meaning clear as I was on the 'quick answer box'). On reflection of course the said Spring of whom I have no Knowledge could be a transexual in the process of gender reassignment which also would account for your post. ii)nis of no consequence in this exegesis but iii) also lends weight to the possibility that 'lasciviousness' was somewhere at play in your comment. (Don't tale offence Seareach - I'm only playing and how often do yoe get to use that beautifully expressive word in a life time!) 'Hence again my intended humorous response of 'Seareeech' ( once again I regret the failure to use an emoticon to express an intention that clearly got lost in it's absence).

Thus does Sherlock Holmes solve 'The Case of the Lost Intention' by, in the manner of all great showmen revealing with a flourish the lost emoticon.

(just in case.)

ps.No but I'm beginning to wish I was.

peter wrote:

Seareach wrote:

peter wrote: Seareeeech!

what? hang on... I'm I'm sufficiently confused (which is an easy thing to do--confuse me, that is). You're not Spring, are you...

Well - lets do a bit of Sherlock Holmes here. 'Gosh He'd be a man now!' implies i) he was other than a man before, ii) an element of suprise at the rapid passage of time and iii) an interest in Spring's new found 'manness'.

In the case of i) I assumed he was a boy preveously that was about to make the transition to manhood and that this had aroused a pefectly understandable feminine interest in him (hence my mock disaprooving 'Seareeech!' (had no emoticons to make my meaning clear as I was on the 'quick answer box'). On reflection of course the said Spring of whom I have no Knowledge could be a transexual in the process of gender reassignment which also would account for your post. ii)nis of no consequence in this exegesis but iii) also lends weight to the possibility that 'lasciviousness' was somewhere at play in your comment. (Don't tale offence Seareach - I'm only playing and how often do yoe get to use that beautifully expressive word in a life time!) 'Hence again my intended humorous response of 'Seareeech' ( once again I regret the failure to use an emoticon to express an intention that clearly got lost in it's absence).

Thus does Sherlock Holmes solve 'The Case of the Lost Intention' by, in the manner of all great showmen revealing with a flourish the lost emoticon.

(just in case.)

ps.No but I'm beginning to wish I was.

ohhhhhhh...I get ya. I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed so...yeah...it's all good. Emoticons help...although, depending on who you are, some people take no notice of them (well, my use of emoticons anyway--persons shall remain nameless but they know who they are!).

Anyway, I was referring to the passage of time rather than anything else. And, alas (for him ): even if he's a man he's way too young for me (I go for older men rather than youngins!!! )

Well reasoned Peter.

(You can still have emoticons in the quick reply box btw. Just type the code for them as you go. A semi-colon and a "right" bracket for a wink for example. )

--A

Phew that was a close one! I thought for a minute I'd offended the most beautiful icon on the watch

Hey - my icon is the hottest on the watch even though it bears ZERO resemblance to me because I'm a bloke and all that

Well it's certainly horney!

Yes - she inspires that indeed

i think my icon is hot.

sgt.null wrote:i think my icon is hot.

He's certainly a sharp dresser...

aliantha wrote:

sgt.null wrote:i think my icon is hot.

He's certainly a sharp dresser...

i think i shalll try to buy a suit like that...

Vain wrote:Hey - my icon is the hottest on the watch even though it bears ZERO resemblance to me because I'm a bloke and all that

Send me a larger version of it, so I can verify it's hotness.