Page 15 of 52
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:19 am
by lucimay
Loremaster wrote:Cameraman Jenn wrote:I believe it's the British equivalent of the middle finger....but I could be wrong.
I am deeply offended if you believe that the great Winston Churchill intended for his gesture to be equivalent to the 'middle finger'. There is much footage, for instance in the campaign in Africa, where is 'two fingers raised' gesture co-occurs with Allied victory against fascism. In that regard, any substantial historial analysis will make explicit a strong correlation between his gesture and victory. Hence, the image is explicitly positive, and I might add, has a certain tone of respect.
and i'm deeply offended that you have the balls to be so condescending.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:20 am
by Loredoctor
Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:/sigh
Yall are pwned just by not knowing pwned. Here, I'll elaborate:

Waddley, as much as admire your effort I must add that your argument is undermined by the broken link. Please fix for I fear my attempts to instruct are not effective.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:21 am
by Waddley
Broken link? What broken link?
I'm confused... I can just delete my post, though, if you like.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:21 am
by Loredoctor
Lucimay wrote:Loremaster wrote:Cameraman Jenn wrote:I believe it's the British equivalent of the middle finger....but I could be wrong.
I am deeply offended if you believe that the great Winston Churchill intended for his gesture to be equivalent to the 'middle finger'. There is much footage, for instance in the campaign in Africa, where is 'two fingers raised' gesture co-occurs with Allied victory against fascism. In that regard, any substantial historial analysis will make explicit a strong correlation between his gesture and victory. Hence, the image is explicitly positive, and I might add, has a certain tone of respect.
and i'm deeply offended that you have the balls to be so condescending.
God damnit, I was joking.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:22 am
by lucimay
Loremaster wrote:Lucimay wrote:Loremaster wrote:
I am deeply offended if you believe that the great Winston Churchill intended for his gesture to be equivalent to the 'middle finger'. There is much footage, for instance in the campaign in Africa, where is 'two fingers raised' gesture co-occurs with Allied victory against fascism. In that regard, any substantial historial analysis will make explicit a strong correlation between his gesture and victory. Hence, the image is explicitly positive, and I might add, has a certain tone of respect.
and i'm deeply offended that you have the balls to be so condescending.
God damnit, I was joking.
OH. (don't curse mick)
ps...i'm off to meet SRD, SRD SRD, i'm off to meet SRD and i'm leaving work right now.
*sings leaving work song*
bye
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:23 am
by Cameraman Jenn
Wow, Loremaster's politese is really good...lots of big words, not really saying anything and then defending his post with condescension....awesome...
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:23 am
by Waddley
It's hard to tell when you're joking, when you're being so damn condescending...

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:25 am
by Loredoctor
Cameraman Jenn wrote:Wow, Loremaster's politese is really good...lots of big words, not really saying anything and then defending his post with condescension....awesome...
Sorry, but I was aiming for dry humour. Do you really think I'd back a picture of churchill saying "pwned" with pretentious language?

Sorry for the confusion.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:26 am
by Cameraman Jenn
So is this where we all hug and make up?

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:28 am
by Waddley
Only if we're in nighties.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:29 am
by Loredoctor
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:40 am
by Cameraman Jenn
We really really need to ask Jay to make us a pillowfighting nightie clad emoticon....
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:43 am
by Loredoctor
Cameraman Jenn wrote:We really really need to ask Jay to make us a pillowfighting nightie clad emoticon....
I fear Creator and Cail will have a heart attack if there is use of such imagery.

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:45 am
by Seareach
Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:Only if we're in nighties.
Um...I don't wear nighties...is there a problem with that?!?!?!?
[OMG...I can't believe I'm getting involved in this conversation!

]
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:49 am
by Cameraman Jenn
Lucimay doesn't either, that just means you have to fight nekked...
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 1:03 am
by Creator
Seareach wrote:Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:Only if we're in nighties.
Um...I don't wear nighties...is there a problem with that?!?!?!?
[OMG...I can't believe I'm getting involved in this conversation!

]
Seareach!!!

you as well!!!!

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 1:08 am
by CovenantJr
Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:CovenantJr wrote:Please don't talk about licking meat
I love you Covenant. Really, I do.
You have my permission to say that loudly in public places. I'll try hard not to be embarrassed.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 1:09 am
by Creator
CovenantJr wrote:Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:CovenantJr wrote:Please don't talk about licking meat
I love you Covenant. Really, I do.
You have my permission to say that loudly in public places. I'll try hard not to be embarrassed.
Hmmmm .... in MY forum you turn RANDY!!!!

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 1:16 am
by Seareach
Creator wrote:Seareach wrote:Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:Only if we're in nighties.
Um...I don't wear nighties...is there a problem with that?!?!?!?
[OMG...I can't believe I'm getting involved in this conversation!

]
Seareach!!!

you as well!!!!

I'd happily join in in a "nekked" <grin> pillow fight BUT you guys are going to have to pay for my ticket to the US! ...otherwise, you'll just have to all dream about me instead!
EDIT: I can't believe I just posted that. Jenn, you're a bad influence!

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 1:33 am
by Cameraman Jenn
Well seriously! What did y'all expect from me? You HAVE seen my show...two girls in bed unable to deal with fantasy novel concepts?....hahahahah
And Seareach? Welcome to the naughty girls club...it's the best club on this forum...