I haven’t read the Gradual Interview for several days, so several things made me want to comment.
SRD wrote:Well, the real reason may be that I'm not a pet person myself. But my meticulously-rationalized, yet spur-of-the-moment, explanation is that the whole notion of "domestication" sort of violates the spirit of Land (at least as it existed in the first "Chronicles"). Sure, ordinary survival depends to some extent on having things like herds, transportation (e.g. horses), etc.. And the people who originally ventured into the Land don't have a particularly attractive history. But once Berek got that whole "reverence for life" thing going, people probably stopped thinking of animals as potential pets.
Quite obviously he’s not a pet person. If he were, he would know that animals are family members. Or, people are members of the animal pack. It’s not an exploitation thing, as he seems to feel.
I get a kick out of the way he pokes fun at himself for rationalizing. He does it in the intro to STRANGE DREAMS, too.
Avalest: Dear Mr Donaldson,
Why at this site is your beard a link to your "private office"? If someone clicks on your beard in real life do they also get linked to your "Private office"?
Thanks for your time, Avalest.
SRD: People who click on my beard in real life usually get linked to my "Private Jab-Cross Combination." <grin> You should try it sometime.
O, can I watch!?!?
SRD wrote:I don't care about mere details like genre, setting, or story-type: I care about the particular gifts and integrity that writer brings to his/her work.
Love the way he says this, especially “integrity”. What he says about valuing the author more than the particular story applies, of course, especially to himself.
SRD wrote:If I accepted a small enough advance (possibly too small to live on), I could probably get published by anybody. (After all, the sales of the GAP books are still better than most of the sf out there. Bantam was only disappointed because their expectatons were so high.) So, no, I wouldn't necessarily have had difficulty, but, yes, I might have had to get a day job. Which at my age would have been "difficulty" on a whole new order of magnitude.
This I can’t understand. Is it conceivable that any college would turn down the chance to have Stephen R. Donaldson teaching their literature classes?