Page 16 of 28
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:17 pm
by [Syl]
As of now, the only Trial entry that will be accepted is Ristra's.
I wrote:explain what role you had in creating a distinguishing characteristic of time
In other words, simply identifying with it is not sufficient.
If you have already posted something (except Ristra), please rewrite and post again.
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:34 pm
by Menolly
Just clarifying that saying
Wings aflutter glow
Creating breeze and sunlight
Day lingers longer
doesn't cover that?
...can't blame a girl for trying.
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:47 pm
by Dread Poet Jethro
Stretch poetic wings
Explain it more thoroughly
Do it Autarch's way
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:54 pm
by Menolly
Can I help it if I was trying to pull an Avatar and get away with as little as possible?
Here I thought the Autarch might appreciate me being succinct, for once...
(not to mention my horrid attempts at your specialty in posting, DPJ)
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 10:43 pm
by Aisha
You kidding? I created time! "There was a time when there was no time. All events happened in the one moment of existence." I put things into layers, and the layers put time into order. Yes, I identify with the past, because I keep a record of it in my bones. It's easy to see the past in the stata of my body. But I don't only identify with it - I created it.
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:12 am
by [Syl]
If that's the case (I thought you were just taking poetic license with the Timelord bit), I would definitely strike that down. I created time. It's in the Origination thread. I'm just asking you guys to divide it. 'Past' is about as good as you're likely to get.
I admit, reading back over them, I skipped over that part, thinking of the strata instead (and thinking that no one except Ristra told a story. And the representational aspect of it works a lot better. If you could focus more on the 'one thing on top of the other' aspect and make that your focus, I think it would work.
Being succinct is fine, Menolly, but that should not be confused for simply being short. Even for a fantasy setting, glowing wings just don't explain summer.
Always keep in mind that I'm asking you to explain the world. You can borrow or steal from novels or mythology, you can use your knowledge of the natural world (a huge advantage if you can also imagine the world without it), or you can just simply make something up that works for you, even if it only loosely 'makes sense.' I haven't kept this same sig for more than a year for nothing.
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:41 pm
by Orlando
Ok, I completely rewrote mine. It fit better with my other story.
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 3:57 am
by Menolly
Redid my entry as well, although I suspect it still is not what is requested. Is all I got for this one, though.
Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 6:34 pm
by [Syl]
The deadline was yesterday. I only have two submissions so far.
Due to the underwhelming response to the Trial, I'm going to cancel it. The players who did submit will receive a bonus of some sort in their turn results. I guess time will just work how it usually does. Four seasons, 24 hour days, etc.
There will be another Trial next turn having to do with the afterlife. Please start thinking about it now -- what happens when people die, where souls (if they exist) go, etc. Picture yourself as the god of Heaven, Hell, or whatever and come up with a story about how you came to be such.
Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 8:31 pm
by Goatkiller666
Um... I've actually been really busy this past week or two. I have some ideas for the trial, but haven't had the time to polish them and post. Nor did I have the time to post my turn on time. (Nor my Prophets turn, for that matter.)
Can you instead extend the Trial deadline? (I'll get my actual turns submitted today, now that I have some time to log in.)
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 10:59 pm
by stonemaybe
where's this new trial then Syl? some of need time to think about these things!
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 11:16 pm
by [Syl]
Sorry, Goat, I somehow missed your post. I might repost the Trial down the road.
I will put the next Trial up once I process results (expect them sometime on Sunday), but it will be pretty much as I described above. The challenge will be to explain the afterlife in a way that the People will understand and determine a niche in it for yourself.
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 12:28 pm
by Goatkiller666
So, I notice that this Trial pretty much calls for competitive explanations of the Afterlife, unless we collude offline and post compatible ones.
Not that that's bad, but it's kind of a difference from past trials. Was that your intent? The winner's description becomes canon?
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 1:44 pm
by [Syl]
My intent is world-building. I know the mechanics, can provide the framework and outline sketches, but I need you guys to put it together, piece by piece.
And hey, all explanation, all language, is competitive. Every word defines itself against an infinite field by setting out what it is not. Acceptance of this word depends on its ability to claim a place in human thought and find consensus, competing against an infinite number of expressions that could mean the same thing -- the losers assigned to irrelevance or, if very lucky, footnotes in etymology.
You could argue that all expression is evolving towards an ideal, a verisimilitude that mirrors the universe at is. I think that's wishful thinking, though, and I have provided a level playing field accordingly.
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 4:01 pm
by Goatkiller666
I guess my comment was more aimed at the logistics of things. I had, perhaps foolishly, felt that once Ristra had claimed Day / Night, it meant I wasn't "allowed" to claim Night. Since that trial wasn't made canonical, my tardiness won't (yet) harm Nyx.
But if I'm changing my approach to include the option of pre-empting what other players write... shit just got real. And by "shit" I mean "this fiction", and by "real" I mean "zero sum for the rest of you".
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 4:39 pm
by [Syl]
The thing is, mythology is different than religion, much less literature. "Canonical" is a tricky question. An older source may say 'x was caused by y' but a more popular present version may say 'x was caused by z.' This is especially tricky when considering the Greek gods' domains, and that's complicated even more by the Roman overlay. Similarly, many Native American myths share similar characters and events, but due to the nature of tribes, the spread out geography, and so on, they can vary wildly.
That being said, turn results should be considered historical, but everything else is fair game.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 6:25 am
by Dread Poet Jethro
Although Goat does not
Venture outside of GT
There’s more to the Watch
Most of us came here
Sharing reference frame of
Multiple stories
Each with different
Perspectives on origins
Of that existence
Goat really should read
Covenant Chronicles to
Understand Syl’s trial
Since those books contain
Creation myths that are so
Contradictory
Or Donaldson may
Craft the ending so they are
Complementary
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 5:36 pm
by Goatkiller666
Yeah, but there's all those weirdos out there, outside of GT.
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 4:52 am
by Avatar
Goatkiller666 wrote:Yeah, but there's all those weirdos out there, outside of GT.
--A
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 6:09 am
by Menolly
...not to mention the ones who do frequent GT.