Pantheon 2.0 - Rules and Comments Thread
Moderator: Xar
- Mistress Cathy
- <i>Haruchai</i>
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:32 pm
- Location: Around the world....
I dunno. I don't nessecarilly want P2 to end, but I AM tired of playing Adomorn. I could just start a new God, but then I have to contend with the fact that I'm surrounded by eight and nine DRP Gods.
And I'm ready for the story to come to a conclusion. I've been talking to some of the other players, and I think Lore and I were in a minority in the playing style (I think) we shared.
That is to say, playing for the story. And I like the stories best that have a good begining, middle and end. I'm looking forward to the kick ass end that this game will have, and then another kick ass begining to Pantheon 3.0
So anyway, yes I am in favor of starting registration for 3.0, which might also include some of the new rule system that Xar's made, and I am also for a good ending to 2.0
I agree with Norn, though, that I don't want a premature ending. If it take's a while more, I don't mind. But an ending is a must for me, I don't like games that go on indefinitely.
And I'm ready for the story to come to a conclusion. I've been talking to some of the other players, and I think Lore and I were in a minority in the playing style (I think) we shared.
That is to say, playing for the story. And I like the stories best that have a good begining, middle and end. I'm looking forward to the kick ass end that this game will have, and then another kick ass begining to Pantheon 3.0
So anyway, yes I am in favor of starting registration for 3.0, which might also include some of the new rule system that Xar's made, and I am also for a good ending to 2.0
I agree with Norn, though, that I don't want a premature ending. If it take's a while more, I don't mind. But an ending is a must for me, I don't like games that go on indefinitely.
Last edited by balon! on Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
Avatar wrote:But then, the answers provided by your imagination are not only sometimes best, but have the added advantage of being unable to be wrong.
- Astavyastataa Kadna
- Bloodguard
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 11:57 am
I meant an EPIC ending, not anoying.Astavyastataa Kadna wrote:I can make an ending!! *MWWWAA HAA HAAA *![]()
![]()
"and the Black Hole that is Astavyastataa Kadna DEVOURS the world ... and then the Universe!!
..... the end!


Avatar wrote:But then, the answers provided by your imagination are not only sometimes best, but have the added advantage of being unable to be wrong.
I have always played with a definite ending in mind for the character of Norn. Once that ending was achieved, it was my plan to create a new character for Pantheon 2. Yes, I'd be starting off much weaker than others, but late starters like Argothoth, Astavyastataa Kadna, Mithyaat Vam and O-gon-cho haven't had too many problems catching up.
Also, I find a lot of the political intrigue just as enjoyable as the story, which is why Nephirthos' arrival saddens me a little. With Nor Yekith gone I thought that we could start to blur the boundaries of good and evil a little, which would have made for some very interesting storylines. With a new "evil overlord" present however I can't see that happening.
Also, I find a lot of the political intrigue just as enjoyable as the story, which is why Nephirthos' arrival saddens me a little. With Nor Yekith gone I thought that we could start to blur the boundaries of good and evil a little, which would have made for some very interesting storylines. With a new "evil overlord" present however I can't see that happening.
With our without Nephirthos, I'm ready to end my role in this game. I'm just ready to start a new guy, with a new outlook.
It would be nice to have a whole new world to play in, though I'm MORE than willing to just make a new guy for this game. I'll see how it plays out in the next few turns.
It would be nice to have a whole new world to play in, though I'm MORE than willing to just make a new guy for this game. I'll see how it plays out in the next few turns.
Avatar wrote:But then, the answers provided by your imagination are not only sometimes best, but have the added advantage of being unable to be wrong.
- Fist and Faith
- Magister Vitae
- Posts: 25465
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 57 times
- Mistress Cathy
- <i>Haruchai</i>
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:32 pm
- Location: Around the world....
Well, if I recall correctly, Xar was in favour of having P3.0 in the same world. (Easier for background/framework/whatever.)
I'm in two minds. On the one hand, as Norn says, with a new global threat, the politics are on the decline...especially since its an NPC. And I like the politics. I was hoping for that blurring as well.
On the other, I've worked hard and I like my domains.
Now we're just gonna can it? (Not that we are...Xar specifically said P2.0 could continue for a while.)
So on that note, Yes, start the registration thread...I'm especially interested in the new rules. But I'm prepared to carry on playing P2.0 as long as it goes.
I'm in two minds. On the one hand, as Norn says, with a new global threat, the politics are on the decline...especially since its an NPC. And I like the politics. I was hoping for that blurring as well.
On the other, I've worked hard and I like my domains.

So on that note, Yes, start the registration thread...I'm especially interested in the new rules. But I'm prepared to carry on playing P2.0 as long as it goes.

Death To All Fanatics!
Let's clarify things, shall we?
I do not intend to end Pantheon 2.0 prematurely, but it is very likely that it will end - the more power each deity gains, the more any accidents it creates have the potential of disrupting the whole world (cryptic hint #1: it just happened in the incoming turn), for example. Additionally, Nor Yekith's defection left a void in the game - that is, while there was some intrigue afterwards, there really was little or no sense of antagonism between some players, and obviously antagonism should be a big part of the game (otherwise it just turns into a big happy family besieged by disasters). Incidentally, despite common sense, it looks like intrigue has INCREASED as a result of the recent events, rather than disappearing. It's just subtler
Additionally, like Balon and a few others, I too would like to have an ending - it doesn't have to be now, but I think each story, including Pantheon 2.0, should have an end. Finally, right now new players have a harder time integrating with the game, because their power is very low when compared to most deities. Many now are DR 7, 8 or (in one case) even 11; a DR-1 deity is considered a nuisance at most, and it may take a long while before he or she can compare to the others. If said player also wants to play a character whose viewpoint is different than other deities - say, an overtly evil deity - he or she simply risks being crushed as soon as the protection expires. Not to mention, of course, that most of those who already "introduced" their new deities aren't new players, but players who already have an existing deity (and therefore couldn't be introduced in Pantheon 2.0 yet, anyway).
With this in mind, I think it's good to think about what comes next. Depending on the actions of the various gods, Pantheon 2.0 could end in a handful of turns or it could continue for ten more, but eventually it is very likely, if not certain, that it will come to an end. Therefore, it doesn't hurt to be prepared, does it?


With this in mind, I think it's good to think about what comes next. Depending on the actions of the various gods, Pantheon 2.0 could end in a handful of turns or it could continue for ten more, but eventually it is very likely, if not certain, that it will come to an end. Therefore, it doesn't hurt to be prepared, does it?

I completely disagree with this statement. The problem is that whatever burgeoning conflict there was was made insignificant by Nephirthos - such a global threat dictated that such fledgling antagonism be put aside. Had the paranoiac not returned then I suspect some small disagreements would have grown quite quickly, and I think they would have been far more interesting in that it is unlikely that there would be a good versus evil split as was the case with Nor Yekith.Xar wrote:Additionally, Nor Yekith's defection left a void in the game - that is, while there was some intrigue afterwards, there really was little or no sense of antagonism between some players, and obviously antagonism should be a big part of the game.
I don't know about anyone else, but I think that this is a good thing. I love the story of Pantheon 2, but it is a game, and without a feeling of actually participating (which I find that the intrigue provides) then it all gets a little pointless.Incidentally, despite common sense, it looks like intrigue has INCREASED as a result of the recent events, rather than disappearing. It's just subtler.
I'm not opposed to setting up a registration and/or rules thread for Pantheon 3. I just feel ending Pantheon 2 anytime soon would be more of a reaction to Nor Yekith's departure and the rise of Nephirthos than a legitimate ending.
There is conflict even though you do not see it - in fact, several gods are actually exploiting the situation to advance their own agendas. If the conflict with Nephirthos prevents anyone else from noticing the hidden currents, I guess all you can say is kudos to those who have hidden their moves so wellNorn wrote:I completely disagree with this statement. The problem is that whatever burgeoning conflict there was was made insignificant by Nephirthos - such a global threat dictated that such fledgling antagonism be put aside. Had the paranoiac not returned then I suspect some small disagreements would have grown quite quickly, and I think they would have been far more interesting in that it is unlikely that there would be a good versus evil split as was the case with Nor Yekith.Xar wrote:Additionally, Nor Yekith's defection left a void in the game - that is, while there was some intrigue afterwards, there really was little or no sense of antagonism between some players, and obviously antagonism should be a big part of the game.

The end of Pantheon 2.0 depends on the actions of the players, with or without Nephirthos's presence. As I told another god, the World Breaker is not synonymous with end of the world: however, he IS a catalyst which could lead to disastrous choices on the part of various gods, and that in turn could well lead to the end of the world. Right now, the current turn displays 3 worldwide threats, and Nephirthos is only one of them; a second one is another threat a long time in the coming, and the third one is born solely of the ill-fated actions of another god. So, playing your cards well could very well extend the lifespan of Pantheon 2.0, but as the gods become more and more powerful, the chance of screwing up in a major way becomes more and more realistic, as the turn will show.Norn wrote:I don't know about anyone else, but I think that this is a good thing. I love the story of Pantheon 2, but it is a game, and without a feeling of actually participating (which I find that the intrigue provides) then it all gets a little pointless.Incidentally, despite common sense, it looks like intrigue has INCREASED as a result of the recent events, rather than disappearing. It's just subtler.
I'm not opposed to setting up a registration and/or rules thread for Pantheon 3. I just feel ending Pantheon 2 anytime soon would be more of a reaction to Nor Yekith's departure and the rise of Nephirthos than a legitimate ending.
In short, despite Nephirthos, the doom of the world is entirely up to you; do not be fooled into thinking, however, that the game can only end if I introduce external elements, because the more you people grow in power, the more likely it is a mistake in your part will be the cause of the end of the game.
Enjoy the thought!

- O-gon-cho
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 1441
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:36 pm
- Location: And closing of the eyes - true vision, The Light within became...Within the Light
...clapping with glee...The AllFather wrote:Let's clarify things, shall we?I do not intend to end Pantheon 2.0 prematurely, but it is very likely that it will end - the more power each deity gains, the more any accidents it creates have the potential of disrupting the whole world (cryptic hint #1: it just happened in the incoming turn), for example.
Oh boy! More cryptic hints!
Uh...on second thought...The AllFather wrote: Right now, the current turn displays 3 worldwide threats, and Nephirthos is only one of them; a second one is another threat a long time in the coming, and the third one is born solely of the ill-fated actions of another god.


- I'm Murrin
- Are you?
- Posts: 15840
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 1:09 pm
- Location: North East, UK
- Contact:
For the record (in response to Norn's comments) I, at least, have tried to keep up intrigue and conflict with other players despite Nephirthos' arrival. (Hey, Asta!)
I have registered an account for a new god: that's because I had an idea for one several months ago, and other people had started doing it, and I wanted a little extra chance of getting the place I wanted. The god I'm planning would require a new Pantheon game to be of any use, but I'm not expecting the end of Pantheon 2 any time soon.
I have registered an account for a new god: that's because I had an idea for one several months ago, and other people had started doing it, and I wanted a little extra chance of getting the place I wanted. The god I'm planning would require a new Pantheon game to be of any use, but I'm not expecting the end of Pantheon 2 any time soon.
Who? ME!!Murrin wrote:For the record (in response to Norn's comments) I, at least, have tried to keep up intrigue and conflict with other players despite Nephirthos' arrival. (Hey, Asta!)...


[Sorry, out of Asta 'clothing' - needed to change email ID and now an ADMIN must reactivate me!

He/She who dies with the most toys wins! Wait a minute ... I can't die!!!
- I'm Murrin
- Are you?
- Posts: 15840
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 1:09 pm
- Location: North East, UK
- Contact: