Kevin's Watch

^Zarkov's happily ignored that fact in the last post, and hopes that at least rudimentary communications are functioning. For extra squirm.

And it sort of worked...

And I didn't think it would happen for quite some time, but the situation on the Bridge is going to be very interesting.

And it was resolved to the great entertainment of myself. Zarkov/Stonemagnet will write the full details up.

Two more famous 40k quotes

I still can't believe that the character with the lowest Willpower score keeps passing all of their Willpower checks.

Ive been watching Hornblower, and just watched the introduction of the character Captain Dreadnought Foster. I think it's clear to say Garrius has another role model.

Dorian wrote:Ive been watching Hornblower, and just watched the introduction of the character Captain Dreadnought Foster. I think it's clear to say Garrius has another role model.

Was that the slightly mentally unhinged older captain played by David Warner?

Very nice post for the duel, but I have a strong suspicion that Zarkov has a very serious amount of discipline coming his way.

I'm going to have a very busy weeknd, so I may not be able to post for a couple of days. I'll see what I can do.

Montresor wrote:
Was that the slightly mentally unhinged older captain played by David Warner?

Na was played by Denis Lawson, turns up in the second movie. He's the sort of captain that would rather fight through a storm then run from it, if you know what I mean.

Just so everyone knows, once we are free of the storm, I would like to have a part of the passage where Garrius sees each of his officers who have been foolhardy one by one and addresses any issues they may have had, such as killing the another senior officer in a duel...

If you were all brothers and sisters, you would be in that situation you find yourself in as children, when you have really messed up, and you know daddys gonna be pissed when he gets home, and theres no hiding it...

Wait, is this when we get to have temper tantrums and storm off, screaming about how Daddy's always away working, and he's never here to even BE a parent, so how can he blame us for being bad kids since he didn't raise us right, blah blah blah blah blah blah <inhale>

blah blah blah...

No, cause unlike your real daddy, Garrius has a penchant for throwing people out of airlocks

Dorian wrote:If you were all brothers and sisters, you would be in that situation you find yourself in as children, when you have really messed up, and you know daddys gonna be pissed when he gets home, and theres no hiding it...

I'm just curious as to the extent that Garrius will enact his authority. While I love Rogue Trader, my main concern with the system is that we someone representing the RT out of necessity with the other players taking supporting roles. It presents the issue of one player having more power than everyone else. I play Praetus as though he think he's the most important and really doesn't recognise Garrius' right to command, and as a player, I'm not if there's anything wrong with that.

Loremaster wrote: I'm just curious as to the extent that Garrius will enact his authority. While I love Rogue Trader, my main concern with the system is that we someone representing the RT out of necessity with the other players taking supporting roles. It presents the issue of one player having more power than everyone else. I play Praetus as though he think he's the most important and really doesn't recognise Garrius' right to command, and as a player, I'm not if there's anything wrong with that.

This is the way I view the game. It's a big reason I was insistent that the RT would have to be new to the job, giving more theoretical power to other players.

In setting terms, the RT could have you all vented out of airlocks (outside the Imperium he is imbued with the authority of a High Lord of Terra, second only to the actual High Lords and the Emperor), but if someone of high authority in the Imperium challenged his motivations (such as an Inquisitor, a Novator, a Governor) then he'd better have seriously good justifications.

Zarkov's situation is a good example. Technically, Garrius could have him demoted for it but, as Zarkov has more respect amongst the crew than Garrius, such a move would be very risky for the RT. Praetus has been pushing his luck a lot, and he shouldn't expect to get away with public insults to the RT without repercussions; on the other hand, the ship will get nowhere without navigators, and the other navigators are likely to back their senior in all things.

I don't want players to worry about being extras in the game, I see all players as equally waited, story-wise.

Dorian wrote: Na was played by Denis Lawson, turns up in the second movie. He's the sort of captain that would rather fight through a storm then run from it, if you know what I mean.

I think I remember that guy. It's been years since I've watched any of them (but I saw them all). I remember the one in France the most of all, with the French nobleman they are helping who has an obsession with killing his peasants.

I know what you mean. I had this conversation with Stone magnet yesterday. As a player, I loved the whole Duel thing, really dug it and thought it was awesome. But in character, Im pretty sure Garrius would be pissed right off.

Also, I said from day one to Montresor, that in taking on the RT I was paranoid about taking on the responsibility of being the primary decision maker and potentially negatively effecting other players experiences through my decisions.

So yeah, I'd like it to be clear that whilst Garrius thinks the Emperors holy beacon shines from his arse, I don't as a player and please, if I ruin someones gaming experience, let me know as that is not the intention.

I will say however, that the system adds more drama than the typical exploring party system. Internal power struggles, like Praetus and Garrius on the bridge, make for some great reading.

Garrius Amphael wrote:No, cause unlike your real daddy, Garrius has a penchant for throwing people out of airlocks

I would just like to point out that, in fact, the reason Andrea has cyber eyes and cyber ears is because her daddy threw her out an airlock at extreme high altitude. The pressure change ruptured her eyes and eardrums.

Montresor can confirm this.

Thanks, Dorian. This is why I consider you one of the best (in the top two) players at KW.

Thanks Michael, coming from you thats an Honor

Dorian wrote: I will say however, that the system adds more drama than the typical exploring party system. Internal power struggles, like Praetus and Garrius on the bridge, make for some great reading.

I completely agree, and the most enjoyment I've had in The Passage so far was reading the interplay between Garrius, Praetus, and Zarkov about the storm and Du Preste.

In one sense, though Zarkov may have messed up by fighting Eyre, he was lucky that he went as far as killing him rather than wounding him. This denies Garrius a decent replacement for Zarkov, and it also denies Garrius someone who would have been all too eager to act against the Lt. Commander. Of course, there's always Alistair Peraton, but he's most likely not quite the man that Eyre was.

Andrea Chan-Gauthier wrote: I would just like to point out that, in fact, the reason Andrea has cyber eyes and cyber ears is because her daddy threw her out an airlock at extreme high altitude. The pressure change ruptured her eyes and eardrums.

Montresor can confirm this.

Haha! That's actually true. It'll just be like old times

Dorian wrote:Thanks Michael, coming from you thats an Honor

No problem.

By the way, are you going to be on msn tonight? I really want to create my character for your setting.