Kaos wrote:Speaking for myself, I'd rather be a pet than a food source or beast of burden any day.
well that may be as it is .. but I thought we were discussing the inhabitants relationship with pets/animals. And it seems that the inhabitants of the Land were not inclined to 'own' pets .. per se
Kaos wrote:And you'll note that the Ramen did not approve of how the people of the Land rode the Ranyhyn.
clearly .. but another example of the respect the inhabitants seemed to have for their animal kin .. it was not their choice .. the choice was with the raynhin .. and that is very telling imho ..
Kaos wrote:We also see only a bare fraction of how the system works.
.. thats very true .. but enough to give us an inclination of the very existence of a workable system and how it functioned .. to some extent anyway.
Kaos" wrote:"Gee, if my parents had been on the
Council like a certain Mhoram I could name I might have passed my
tests too..."
here I think you miscomprehend the role of the Council .. those who were appointed as Lords of the Keep .. gave their service freely and it entailed great sacrifice. It wasnt a 'position' sought after as we may find in our world .. persons seeking a given position for the prestige and monetary reward involved.
It was an honour to serve on the Council .. and appointments do not seem to have been designated by the level of greed or ambition of the intended ..
Kaos wrote:I'd argue that the Giants gave Revelstone to the Lords in gratitude
for being given land
yes they were given Coercri and the very nature of the Giants .. in the 2nd chrons we see more so .. they were prepared to do their part to assist where the need arose ..
its a matter of attitude ..
Kaos wrote:From what Foamfollower said, the Giants had
plainly experienced lands where they had had to fight for survival,
so they knew they were fortunate to come to the good people of
the Land.
.. indeed and this is on point re: the subject of the discussion .. the inhabitants of the Land were good people .. supported in their goodness by an admirable system.
Kaos wrote:Where did you get the idea of representatives?
yes danlo thankyou for explaining this .. clearly I am not refering to the fact that those at Lords Keep were from a various sections of the Land .. not just one race .. so not just one ethnic/racial group reigned supreme over all others by the mere virtue of race or ethnicity ..
Kaos wrote:There were the Lords,
the people who did the actual work at Revelstone-- Gravelingas,
Hirebrands, cattleherders, etc-- but I don't recall seeing anyone with
any political power at Revelstone other than the Lords
.
exactly! I was not refering to our concept of political power .. and the Lords were made up of a cross-section of many of the racial groups of the Land .. particularly those who desired to enter the Loreseraat .. and learn the lore .. As you recall Lena - a stonedowner .. wished to undergo her own training at the Loreseraat ..
Kaos wrote:What makes you think it was sound?
umm .. because it seemingly functioned effectively .. and met the needs of the inhabitants
Kaos wrote:if they did a terrible job-- the people of the Land really had no more
say in how their government was run than the serfs of 19th Century
Russia.Basically, the Land seemed to operate under the Marxist creed as you paraphrased it, and as I'm going to paraphrase it: "From each according to his ability to each, according to his needs."A good concept but one that proved impractical in our world
mmm .. yet in the Land it did suffice but nothing is perfect .. nor would the Lords claim it to be .. nothing is .. even in the Land .. but they came real close .. didnt they?
Kaos wrote:Besides, we don't know what the Cavewights and other non-humans thought of how the humans ran things, do we?
thats a valid point .. we dont