Page 3 of 4
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:44 pm
by Menolly
Emotional Leper wrote:Menolly wrote:Guns, I can't argue with a word you said. I'm just tired of "the hometown boy who made it big" idolization of Petty here in Gator Town.
I don't know who you hung around with, but most of the people in circles I frequented absolutely hated Petty. Could be bothered to give one bit back to the Town that made him Big? When was the last time he did a Concert in Gainesville? The Swamp not a big enough venue for him? 'cause it'd be bloody packed.
September 21, 2006. Along with Stevie Nicks. In the O'Connell Center.
Sold out and then some.
Heartbreaker Homecoming
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:25 pm
by [Syl]
As far as grunge goes, yeah Alice in Chains is the only true contender (though I've pretty much written off Facelift). The vast bulk of Pearl Jam is destined for obscurity, with the exception of Vs and maybe Ten (for better or worse, I'll probably still be hearing Jeremy on the radio the day I die). STP and Soundgarden, forget it. Black Hole Sun will show up on All Your Favorite Hits of the 90s when we're all in retirement homes, but that's about it. Nirvana's about the same as Pearl Jam, in that all of their radio songs will be popular forever (like the Beatles), but few will bother with the albums. I'd say the Toadies first album, Rubberneck, will stand up well. But they've never been a very popular band. I think Mad Season and Temple of the Dog will both hold up, but the former leans on Staley and the latter on star power. Sublime (not grunge, but deserves mention) should do well, but that may just be my own personal bias.
My list of ones that haven't aged well - Megadeth, Biohazard, Suicidal Tendancies, Godsmack, and Korn.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 6:35 pm
by exnihilo
Yeah I forgot about Biohazard, proto-raprock which is extremely dated.
Might as well throw Limp Bizkit out there also. Although I never, ahem, really liked them much. Not like I own an album or anything. No not me.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 6:57 pm
by danlo
I could come up with a long arguement why I disagree with you on Soundgarden with such songs as Outshined, Blow Up the Outside World, Rusty Cage, about 5 other damm good songs on Superunknown, some great long guitar riffs and some really good obscure songs. Will have to do some further research. I do, however, agree with everything else you two have said...
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 1:52 am
by Cail
I like a few Godsmack songs, but to be fair, they all sound alike.
AiC was the only grunge band that was worth a damn in my humble estimation.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:31 am
by danlo
I argee that AiC was great, as to the only I disagree...Fell on Black Days, Spoonman, Smokestack/Lightning...
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:00 am
by Cail
Again, my opinion.
Nirvana was all hype, as were many of the grunge bands. MTV and Rolling Stone were nothing bu cheerleaders driving a change in the industry (much like the press learned they could affect politics with Watergate). Nirvana achieved legendary status based on the hype, not on the music. The other grunge bands rode their coattails.
Consider this.
Grunge hit 15 years ago.
20 years ago, in the height of the hair metal and euro-pop scene, it was still very common to hear 15-year old music on AOR radio. The Eagles, the Stones, Zeppelin, Rod Stewart, and Peter Frampton were still staples. Not so now with grunge at least around here. Sure, you'll still hear Smells Like Teen Spirit, Would?, or Jeremy every once in a while, but they're hardly ubiquitous. Why?
In my humble opinion (and in shocking irony), it's because the grunge bands weren't about the music as much as they were about the attitude and the look, and the bare-bones production of the music. There was no grunge musicians that were virtuosos. There's no grunge John Bonham, or Geezer Butler, or Rod Stewart, or Jimmy Page. Sure, the media tried to elevate Cobain to Dylan or Morrison status, but he simply wasn't. For all the talk about how banal '80s butt-rock was, I hear Poison, Ratt, and Def Leppard on the radio far more often than I hear AiC, Pearl Jam, or Soundgarden.
The proof is in the pudding. When was the last time you heard Screaming Trees on the radio?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:05 am
by Lord Mhoram
I hear grunge bands on the radio way more than I hear any hair metal band. Might depend on what stations we're listening to. I have to disagree with you about the merits of grunge. Personally I think that Pearl Jam is awful and that AIC were very good. Kim Thayil (think that's his name) of Soundgarden, however, is a virtuoso. Cobain had a true musical vision, whether you liked that vision or not. That's what made him great.
edit: and if anything, it was the hair metal bands that were about the image.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:16 am
by Cail
Again, radio stations in different areas play different stuff.
Hair metal bands were certainly about image, but there were a ton of great singers and great musicians. Not so with grunge.
And the unshaven, scruffy-haired, flannel look was a badge, just like the spandex, eyeliner, and Aquanet-hair was.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:35 am
by stormrider
Cail wrote:The proof is in the pudding. When was the last time you heard Screaming Trees on the radio?
Funny you should say that --
Nearly Lost You was on the radio a couple of days ago, and I remember thinking, "Oh man, I completely forgot about these guys."
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:25 am
by bloodguard bob

...yep, I may always be a fan.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:45 am
by duke
My take on grunge is that it is what it is - depressing, down, emotionally heavy rock.
In other words, to an extent it is fairly one-dimensional. Where's the uplifting, happy, jokey Nirvana song? Where are the riotous, "up" party anthems? Basically, there arent any.
Pearl Jam came close with "Given to Fly" on Yield, but even that song begins with the lyrics
"He could've tuned in, tuned in
But he tuned out
A bad time, nothing could save him"
... and its a song of affirmation, not really a "lets party" song.
So although I love Nirvana, Pearl Jam, Soundgarden, Alice in Chains etc, theyre just damn depressing to listen to.
Cail - Virtuosos? I think Cobain had some genius in him, Eddie Vedder's gotta go close just for "black" from Ten, and Jerry Cantrell ... "Dirt" certainly does it for me in the guitars/riffs department.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:15 pm
by emotional leper
bloodguard bob wrote:
...yep, I may always be a fan.
Antwarrior for Life!
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:41 pm
by Cail
It's funny that Cantrell was mentioned. He's the only musician from the grunge era that I think comes close. But there really isn't an Eddie Van Halen, Jimmy Page, George Lynch, and so on.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:27 pm
by danlo
LM wrote:Kim Thayil (think that's his name) of Soundgarden, however, is a virtuoso.
Great posting! I knew I liked you for
some reason!!!

Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:43 pm
by Lord Mhoram
Heh. The guy is a genius, danlo.

And Cail, Jerry Cantrell is very good as well, but I would venture that Kim Thayil is a more talented musician.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:22 pm
by Cail
I think very little of Soundgarden.
To each their own.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:26 pm
by Lord Mhoram
To be honest I am not a huge fan of theirs either. But I really respect that guy's musicianship.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:37 pm
by Cail
It surprises me that you'd say that. I can't think of anything that Soundgarden did that would make you think Thayil is that good. I found their music bland and uninspired.
And I'm not saying that to be snarky. I seriously don't get what people liked about them. 'Outshined' wasn't a bad song ('cause it sounds like a Dio song), but 'Black Hole Sun' just flat sucked.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:54 pm
by danlo
You're crazy, you probably don't like Bush either if you don't care that much for STP or Godsmack--now I have to go listen to a bunch of alt rock to calm down
