Page 3 of 4

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:14 pm
by High Lord Tolkien
I got this from the theonion.com:

"Hey, that wasn't supposed to come out yet. Incloseto putbacko!"

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:16 pm
by The Laughing Man
are there still movies to be made from the books? How is this going to affect that I wonder..... :roll:

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:38 pm
by Menolly
Esmer wrote:are there still movies to be made from the books? How is this going to affect that I wonder..... :roll:
That has already happened, Es...
Rowling told the audience that while working on the planned sixth Potter film, "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince," she spotted a reference in the script to a girl who once was of interest to Dumbledore. A note was duly passed to director David Yates, revealing the truth about her character.

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:42 pm
by The Laughing Man
yea, but WE didn't know about it, I'm not sure if Gambon or Harris knew it either. I'm thinking more of the pressure for the character to "respond" to the "gayness" that is now "expected" of him in the next movie? Will we now see blatant, or even not so blatant even subtle, references to it now? :?

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:46 pm
by wayfriend
More likely, we'll see anti-gay protests at movie openings.

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:53 pm
by The Laughing Man
OMG, here comes Fred Phelps! "God hates Dumbledore!" :soapbox:


8O

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:53 pm
by Menolly
Esmer wrote:yea, but WE didn't know about it, I'm not sure if Gambon or Harris knew it either. I'm thinking more of the pressure for the character to "respond" to the "gayness" that is now "expected" of him in the next movie? Will we now see blatant, or even not so blatant even subtle, references to it now? :?
I think people will see what they want to see. I doubt Gambon will change his portrayal because of this.

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:54 pm
by Cameraman Jenn
Geez, I hope not. I think Gambon is a decent enough actor that he won't get it all femmed up.

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:58 pm
by The Laughing Man
Any chance he might refuse the role? He is mentioned as being a strict Catholic, but I haven't found any comments yet from him, so at least he's not speaking out about it, but I wonder.....

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:18 pm
by Cameraman Jenn
I doubt it. It's just a role it's not like he is promoting homosexuality or condoning it or anything. Right? 8O

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:22 pm
by The Laughing Man
not saying he should refuse it, you just never know these days. people can be funny that way? I mean, if they had originally approached him and asked him to play a gay wizard, would he have taken the role? What about Harris?

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:25 pm
by wayfriend
Wait! This just in! A production picture from Half Blood Prince:

:
scroll down
:








:









:








:














Michael Gambon as Rudumble, Hogwarts Headmaster.

Image

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:26 pm
by Menolly
*snort*

Thanks WF!!

Es...he's an actor. Did you ever see the commercial Loretta Switt, a strict vegetarian, did for Burger King? Or that Earth, Wind, and Fire did for a beer (I think it was Miller High Life), even though several members were strict tee-totallers? Same principal.

I mean shoot. I'm Jewish. I don't write out any names of G-d if I recognize a word as such. But sightreading in chorus, at least in my experience, is almost always done using a hymnal. And I have no problem with that.

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:27 pm
by Cameraman Jenn
Harris would have done it. He was fearless in the roles he took.... "A Man Called Horse." 8O :biggrin:

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:31 pm
by The Laughing Man
I loved Harris, and miss him. He was my Mhoram..... :(



:chill: I hear you, Menolly, I'm just sayin'....... ;)

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 12:21 pm
by Menolly
Esmer wrote: :chill: I hear you, Menolly, I'm just sayin'....... ;)
Image

...more like "stirrin' the pot," Es...

But then, that is what Esmer does, isn't it? ;)

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:06 pm
by The Laughing Man
every pot needs stirrin'! you just have to know not to stir the bottom.... ;)

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:13 pm
by Menolly
Esmer wrote:every pot needs stirrin'! you just have to know not to stir the bottom.... ;)
*giggle*

...sounds like I should split this thread and put it into the other forum I host...

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:44 pm
by A Gunslinger
Who the hell cares. The beauty of JKR's "revelation" is that D being gay ISN'T relevant in and of itself to the story. Dumbledore is what he is REGARDLESS of his orientation, just like non-fictional gays.

I must admit however, abot a dozen cheap wand jokes came to mind....

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 11:14 pm
by stormrider
I still don't see the point of revealing this information outside the context of the books. If JKR was trying to help fans understand why Dumbledore was so easily infatuated with Grindelwald and his ideas, why not work out the issue of his homosexuality within the actual storyline? If the information wasn't important enough to be given to us in the books, why mention it now? I can see why she's telling us about the other characters' futures -- naturally, people are curious. But Dumbledore was already dead. Personally, once he was dead and the issues about his family were resolved, I wasn't very curious anymore.

But I guess everyone's already said that.

Still, I suppose it'll be interesting the next time I read the books. I've got a funny feeling about that twinkle in his eye...