A kids guide to internet safety

Post by **emotional leper** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 6:10 am

CovenantJr wrote:
Emotional Leper wrote:Hentai literally means 'pervert' or 'perverted,' I think. It's been a while since I studied Japanese, but I'm fairly sure that you'd be more likely to call someone hentai than to call porn hentai.
Yeah, that's what I was getting at; I was just too lazy to try and explain it. I appreciate your efforts, Emo Boy.

No you don't! I have to go cry and write more Snape/Potter ficcies now!

Post by **CovenantJr** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 4:51 pm

Post by **Waddley** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 6:11 pm

KiGirl wrote:
Emotional Leper wrote:For all of you parents out there, let me tell you that with unrestricted access to the internet (And I'm only 22, by the way,) I'd found porn by the time I was nine. And this was in the olden days.

Also, beware myspace.

Actually, block everything but Wikipedia.
MY son would never look at porn. LOLOOLOLOOOLOLOL!

That's what my parents would have said about me and my brother.

I was 10 and on the internet less than a week when I found unsavory chat rooms to kill my innocence in.

On the other hand, both me and my brother turned out just fine, so.... meh. Whatever.

Post by **CovenantJr** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 6:52 pm

Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:On the other hand, both me and my brother turned out just fine, so.... meh. Whatever.

Did you? Did you indeed?

Post by **sgt.null** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:08 pm

Post by Ki » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:24 pm

i am not naive enough to really think that my 15 y.o. wouldn't access porn on the internet (or elsewhere for that matter). i am sure he has. maybe i shouldn't feel this way, but porn is really the least of my worries for him. i worry more about who he is talking to on the internet, who his friends are, where he is, and trying to educate him on the dangers of tobacco, irresponsible sex, drugs, alcohol, etc.

Post by **emotional leper** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:39 pm

KiGirl wrote:i am not naive enough to really think that my 15 y.o. wouldn't access porn on the internet (or elsewhere for that matter). i am sure he has. maybe i shouldn't feel this way, but porn is really the least of my worries for him. i worry more about who he is talking to on the internet, who his friends are, where he is, and trying to educate him on the dangers of tobacco, irresponsible sex, drugs, alcohol, etc.

As a former fifteen year old, I think if my parents had cared more about those things and less about me chancing upon porn (on purpose,) I'd have turned out better.

Also, don't hit your kids. It never helps.
[edit] Unless you really, really need to work off some steam. Then use a two by four.

Post by **emotional leper** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:42 pm

Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:
KiGirl wrote:
Emotional Leper wrote:For all of you parents out there, let me tell you that with unrestricted access to the internet (And I'm only 22, by the way,) I'd found porn by the time I was nine. And this was in the olden days.

Also, beware myspace.

Actually, block everything but Wikipedia.
MY son would never look at porn. LOLOOLOLOOOLOLOL!
That's what my parents would have said about me and my brother.

I was 10 and on the internet less than a week when I found unsavory chat rooms to kill my innocence in.

Please, do us he courtesy of respecting our respective intelligences and don't libel your character that way again

We all know they stopped making innocents in '79. July 2nd.

The Waddleykin, 2/2 Pink Denimwalker wrote:On the other hand, both me and my brother turned out just fine, so.... meh. Whatever.

The spies have yet to provide me with documented evidence of this. I should either pay them more, or kill fewer of them.

Post by **Waddley** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:50 pm

KiGirl wrote:i am not naive enough to really think that my 15 y.o. wouldn't access porn on the internet (or elsewhere for that matter). i am sure he has. maybe i shouldn't feel this way, but porn is really the least of my worries for him. i worry more about who he is talking to on the internet, who his friends are, where he is, and trying to educate him on the dangers of tobacco, irresponsible sex, drugs, alcohol, etc.

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply nativity. I'm not good at this internetting thing

Anyway, I absolutely agree with you. Naked people? Not a huge deal, we're all naked under our clothes. Talking to a creep on the web who has malicious intentions? Pretty big deal, imo.

Post by **CovenantJr** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:43 pm

Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:Anyway, I absolutely agree with you. Naked people? Not a huge deal, we're all naked under our clothes. Talking to a creep on the web who has malicious intentions? Pretty big deal, imo.

Yeah, keep them away from dAN.

Post by **sgt.null** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:13 pm

Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:
Anyway, I absolutely agree with you. Naked people? Not a huge deal, we're all naked under our clothes. Talking to a creep on the web who has malicious intentions? Pretty big deal, imo.

then why won't girls send me nekkid pics?

Post by **emotional leper** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:40 pm

sgt.null wrote:
Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:
Anyway, I absolutely agree with you. Naked people? Not a huge deal, we're all naked under our clothes. Talking to a creep on the web who has malicious intentions? Pretty big deal, imo.
then why won't girls send me nekkid pics?

That's because of rule 16. There are no girls on the internet.

Goes along with rule 11. You must have pictures to prove your statement.

Post by **CovenantJr** » Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:29 am

Emotional Leper wrote:
sgt.null wrote:
Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:
Anyway, I absolutely agree with you. Naked people? Not a huge deal, we're all naked under our clothes. Talking to a creep on the web who has malicious intentions? Pretty big deal, imo.
then why won't girls send me nekkid pics?

That's because of rule 16. There are no girls on the internet.

Damn, you're really on form the last few days, Emo Face.

Post by **sgt.null** » Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:31 am

Emotional Leper wrote:
That's because of rule 16. There are no girls on the internet.

Goes along with rule 11. You must have pictures to prove your statement.

that explains why that one girl has a "surprise" package.

Post by **emotional leper** » Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:59 am

CovenantJr wrote:
Emotional Leper wrote:
sgt.null wrote: then why won't girls send me nekkid pics?

That's because of rule 16. There are no girls on the internet.
Damn, you're really on form the last few days, Emo Face.

I gotta whole pack of razorblades right here, and no feeling in my extremities!

I'll do it!

I'll take pictures! See?!

ED is great. I get to read through it and it reminds me of all the "good times" (non-existant), while getting to laugh my ass of at people who are doing exactly what I did. Hilarious. Is that was offspring are for? To laugh at?

Post by Ki » Mon Dec 24, 2007 3:13 am

Waddley Hasselhoff wrote: Sorry, I didn't mean to imply nativity. I'm not good at this internetting thing

oh, no, not at all.....i guess i sounded a little snippy, but that wasn't my intent at all. you are really good at this interneting thing; much better than i am. i just didn't want anyone to think that i am really one of those moms who thinks her kids never do anything wrong. not that looking at naked girls is wrong. but you know what i mean. right?

Post by **Waddley** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:24 am

KiGirl wrote:but you know what i mean. right?

Yup!!

Post by **sgt.null** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:59 pm

Post by **emotional leper** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:41 pm

sgt.null wrote:

Is... is that a guy or a girl? I can't tell.

EMO CHECK: HIGH EMO LEVELS EMANATING FROM PICTURE.

Post by **sgt.null** » Sat Dec 29, 2007 3:46 pm

with emo it don't matter the gender, just the love...

Kevin's Watch

Kevin's Watch

A kids guide to internet safety