Page 3 of 4
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 6:10 am
by emotional leper
CovenantJr wrote:Emotional Leper wrote:Hentai literally means 'pervert' or 'perverted,' I think. It's been a while since I studied Japanese, but I'm fairly sure that you'd be more likely to call someone hentai than to call porn hentai.
Yeah, that's what I was getting at; I was just too lazy to try and explain it.
I appreciate your efforts, Emo Boy. 
No you don't! I have to go cry and write more Snape/Potter ficcies now!
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 4:51 pm
by CovenantJr
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 6:11 pm
by Waddley
KiGirl wrote:Emotional Leper wrote:For all of you parents out there, let me tell you that with unrestricted access to the internet (And I'm only 22, by the way,) I'd found porn by the time I was nine. And this was in the olden days.
Also, beware myspace.
Actually, block everything but Wikipedia.
MY son would never look at porn. LOLOOLOLOOOLOLOL!
That's what my parents would have said about me and my brother.
I was 10 and on the internet less than a week when I found unsavory chat rooms to kill my innocence in.
On the other hand, both me and my brother turned out just fine, so.... meh. Whatever.
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 6:52 pm
by CovenantJr
Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:On the other hand, both me and my brother turned out just fine, so.... meh. Whatever.
Did you? Did you indeed?

Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:08 pm
by sgt.null
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:24 pm
by Ki
i am not naive enough to really think that my 15 y.o. wouldn't access porn on the internet (or elsewhere for that matter). i am sure he has. maybe i shouldn't feel this way, but porn is really the least of my worries for him. i worry more about who he is talking to on the internet, who his friends are, where he is, and trying to educate him on the dangers of tobacco, irresponsible sex, drugs, alcohol, etc.
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:39 pm
by emotional leper
KiGirl wrote:i am not naive enough to really think that my 15 y.o. wouldn't access porn on the internet (or elsewhere for that matter). i am sure he has. maybe i shouldn't feel this way, but porn is really the least of my worries for him. i worry more about who he is talking to on the internet, who his friends are, where he is, and trying to educate him on the dangers of tobacco, irresponsible sex, drugs, alcohol, etc.
As a former fifteen year old, I think if my parents had cared more about those things and less about me chancing upon porn (on purpose,) I'd have turned out better.
Also, don't hit your kids. It never helps.
[edit] Unless you really, really need to work off some steam. Then use a two by four.
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:42 pm
by emotional leper
Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:KiGirl wrote:Emotional Leper wrote:For all of you parents out there, let me tell you that with unrestricted access to the internet (And I'm only 22, by the way,) I'd found porn by the time I was nine. And this was in the olden days.
Also, beware myspace.
Actually, block everything but Wikipedia.
MY son would never look at porn. LOLOOLOLOOOLOLOL!
That's what my parents would have said about me and my brother.
I was 10 and on the internet less than a week when I found unsavory chat rooms to
kill my innocence in.
Please, do us he courtesy of respecting our respective intelligences and don't libel your character that way again

We all know they stopped making innocents in '79. July 2nd.
The Waddleykin, 2/2 Pink Denimwalker wrote:On the other hand, both me and my brother turned out just fine, so.... meh. Whatever.
The spies have yet to provide me with documented evidence of this. I should either pay them more, or kill fewer of them.
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:50 pm
by Waddley
KiGirl wrote:i am not naive enough to really think that my 15 y.o. wouldn't access porn on the internet (or elsewhere for that matter). i am sure he has. maybe i shouldn't feel this way, but porn is really the least of my worries for him. i worry more about who he is talking to on the internet, who his friends are, where he is, and trying to educate him on the dangers of tobacco, irresponsible sex, drugs, alcohol, etc.
Sorry, I didn't mean to imply nativity. I'm not good at this internetting thing
Anyway, I absolutely agree with you. Naked people? Not a huge deal, we're all naked under our clothes. Talking to a creep on the web who has malicious intentions? Pretty big deal, imo.
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:43 pm
by CovenantJr
Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:Anyway, I absolutely agree with you. Naked people? Not a huge deal, we're all naked under our clothes. Talking to a creep on the web who has malicious intentions? Pretty big deal, imo.
Yeah, keep them away from dAN.
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:13 pm
by sgt.null
Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:
Anyway, I absolutely agree with you. Naked people? Not a huge deal, we're all naked under our clothes. Talking to a creep on the web who has malicious intentions? Pretty big deal, imo.
then why won't girls send me nekkid pics?

Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:40 pm
by emotional leper
sgt.null wrote:Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:
Anyway, I absolutely agree with you. Naked people? Not a huge deal, we're all naked under our clothes. Talking to a creep on the web who has malicious intentions? Pretty big deal, imo.
then why won't girls send me nekkid pics?

That's because of rule 16. There are no girls on the internet.
Goes along with rule 11. You must have pictures to prove your statement.
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:29 am
by CovenantJr
Emotional Leper wrote:sgt.null wrote:Waddley Hasselhoff wrote:
Anyway, I absolutely agree with you. Naked people? Not a huge deal, we're all naked under our clothes. Talking to a creep on the web who has malicious intentions? Pretty big deal, imo.
then why won't girls send me nekkid pics?

That's because of rule 16. There are no girls on the internet.

Damn, you're really on form the last few days, Emo Face.
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:31 am
by sgt.null
Emotional Leper wrote:
That's because of rule 16. There are no girls on the internet.
Goes along with rule 11. You must have pictures to prove your statement.
that explains why that one girl has a "surprise" package.
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:59 am
by emotional leper
CovenantJr wrote:Emotional Leper wrote:sgt.null wrote:
then why won't girls send me nekkid pics?

That's because of rule 16. There are no girls on the internet.

Damn, you're really on form the last few days, Emo Face.
I gotta whole pack of razorblades right here, and no feeling in my extremities!
I'll do it!
I'll take pictures! See?!
ED is great. I get to read through it and it reminds me of all the "good times" (non-existant), while getting to laugh my ass of at people who are doing exactly what I did. Hilarious. Is that was offspring are for? To laugh at?
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 3:13 am
by Ki
Waddley Hasselhoff wrote: Sorry, I didn't mean to imply nativity. I'm not good at this internetting thing
oh, no, not at all.....i guess i sounded a little snippy, but that wasn't my intent at all. you are really good at this interneting thing; much better than i am. i just didn't want anyone to think that i am really one of those moms who thinks her kids never do anything wrong. not that looking at naked girls is wrong. but you know what i mean. right?
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:24 am
by Waddley
KiGirl wrote:but you know what i mean. right?
Yup!!

Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:59 pm
by sgt.null
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:41 pm
by emotional leper
sgt.null wrote:
Is... is that a guy or a girl? I can't tell.
EMO CHECK: HIGH EMO LEVELS EMANATING FROM PICTURE.
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 3:46 pm
by sgt.null
with emo it don't matter the gender, just the love...