Kevin's Watch

Smokescreen!

(JO hn bla KE)

Exnihilo2 wrote:Smokescreen!

(JO hn bla KE)

So, all your evidence comes from Levitt looking similar to Ledger, and isolating J O and K E from John Blake. Despite the enormous evidence that he's playing another character.

John Blake . . . Hmmm. Two names that sound like first names. Oh my god, he's playing Two Face!

John Blake . . . Blake sounds like Clay. Could he be playing Clayface?

No hold on, John . . . Jonathan . . . Jonathan Crane? I knew Scarecrow was coming back.

Must I continue?

Loremaster wrote:

Orlion wrote:Christopher Nolan has stated in very clear terms that the Joker will not be returning. Also, Levitt has been casted to play John Blake.

It's starting to remind me of the theories that Two Face never died at the end of the Dark Knight. Which is a theory of equal validity to Exnihilo's

Yep

Just read these pages and tell me I'm wrong!

A boy, called John Blake, has a piece of paper taken off him by the Joker, and that proves your theory? All it proves is that Nolan is as much of a fan of the comic as he has always said. You're coming into this stating that the Joker is back in the movie, and instead of using evidence to support your theory, you're twisting evidence to make your theory look correct. Look, this is all fun, but I see nothing in this to support it.

Besides, we have seen Levitt in costume, there are no Joker scars. He's not the Joker. Case closed.

Loremaster wrote:A boy, called John Blake, has a piece of paper taken off him by the Joker, and that proves your theory? All it proves is that Nolan is as much of a fan of the comic as he has always said. You're coming into this stating that the Joker is back in the movie, and instead of using evidence to support your theory, you're twisting evidence to make your theory look correct. Look, this is all fun, but I see nothing in this to support it.

Besides, we have seen Levitt in costume, there are no Joker scars. He's not the Joker. Case closed.

So you say. I'm not persuaded! If I'm right, this would have to be one of the best kept secrets in cinematic history... I can see them going to a lot of trouble to hide a twist of this magnitude, including shooting dummy footage.

BTW, in case it isn't clear, my assertions are 50% tongue in cheek. But no more than that.

Exnihilo2 wrote:BTW, in case it isn't clear, my assertions are 50% tongue in cheek. But no more than that.

Thought so Look if you are right, I'm eating my hat.

Hope that's a porkpie hat, Lore.
At least it would be tasty...
(not endorsing or rejecting Exnihilo's theory; just playing with words, as I so often do.)

john blake is the father of adam blake, adam blake is captain comet..