Page 3 of 6
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:01 am
by drew
Does anyone else notice that Rob or Rod or whatever he is calling himself these days has dropped out of the debate??
Its fairly disappointing that no one stands behind their convictions anymore...
at least Patrick Stewart loving, Y supporting individuals.
But Rob (or Rod) come back.
We don't hate you.
Just because I posted those doctored naked pictures of you on YouPorn doesn't mean I want you out of this discussion. I didn't want to do it, but Sarge said if I didn't, it would prove that I hate Shatner, thus revoking my identity as a socialist Canadian truck driving poet.
I really dont understand Sarge sometimes.
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 5:09 am
by rdhopeca
rdhopeca wrote:but if your picture had a birthmark on your forehead, you would look exactly like Gorbachev.
If you've truly descended to this, we both know I've won

When you win, there's no need to return, eh?
Besides, I am traveling for work. When I am done traveling for work, I'll be certain to come back and debate some more. By then perhaps you'll have come up with argument that's sound (although I doubt it because sound is the penultimate issue with 'X', it's hard to pronounce, whereas the superior flexibility of 'Y' makes it most sound.)
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 6:53 am
by sgt.null
drew wrote:
I really dont understand Sarge sometimes.
I am the most resonable person in this debate, and you just can't understand my flawless logic.
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:19 am
by rdhopeca
sgt.null wrote:drew wrote:
I really dont understand Sarge sometimes.
I am the most resonable person in this debate, and you just can't understand my flawless logic.
Doesn't your logic have to exist to be considered 'flawless'?
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 4:25 pm
by sgt.null
i have posted links to articles by people other than me that point out eXactley how genius I am.
your conditioned response is indicitive of the failure of post neo-liberal conservative third party thinking.
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 2:39 pm
by rdhopeca
That still doesn't address the nonexistence of your logic. Never mind the flawlessness thereof. Maybe you should post an actual argument instead of more internet fodder.
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:03 pm
by sgt.null
if you had an argument - you would refute my posts instead of attacking me.
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2017 1:10 pm
by drew
Wow. I used to make good posts back in the day!
Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:12 am
by aTOMiC
You are all wrong and your posts are factually flawed and lack the proper political perspective.
This may help you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 12:43 am
by StevieG
Nobody trusts that source you just linked - it's well known to be completely biased. If you want a proper political site, choose this:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/us-politics
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 11:49 am
by aTOMiC
What a myopic response to my post. Adding links to this thread should be banned.
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2020 3:51 am
by sgt.null
Commies.
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 2:13 am
by High Lord Tolkien
Fuck you!

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 3:11 am
by sgt.null
I'm telling the Mods!
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 12:07 pm
by samrw3
The mods are total tools and I am surprised you would sink to such levels.
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 12:52 pm
by sgt.null
the Mods will just agree with you anyway.
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2020 6:46 am
by StevieG
Ban THEM, not me. I only made one (or many) personal attacks, but THEY made at least one (or many) personal attacks. Ban THEM.
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2020 6:54 am
by sgt.null
I was simply responding to you.
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2020 7:22 am
by StevieG
Did you even read my last post? You're increasingly eye-poppingly swivel-eyed in your mischaracterisation of my oh so obvious position.
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2020 7:27 am
by sgt.null
Well I can't help that you simply just will not te the truth.
I guess its a Momentary lapse of Reason on your part.