Jeremiah *Potential Spoilers*

Book 1 of the Last Chronicles of Thomas Covenant

Moderator: dlbpharmd

User avatar
finn
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 4349
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 5:03 am
Location: Maintaining an unsociable distance....

Post by finn »

[quote="Nerdanel"]I don't know how it could be possible that Lord Foul's words are coming true right now but not in the way that he wanted. I expect that things will eventually turn out fairly happily or at least not entirely sadly but I don't think everything can be fine re: Jeremiah at this point.

Unless Jeremiah has a hidden condition that will kill him in a nasty way unless Linden finds a cure or the Jeremiah Linden sees is not the real Jeremiah, I see no way out him currently serving Lord Foul somehow. The options were 1) to die in torment or 2) to serve Lord Foul, and the former doesn't look to be the case. Jeremiah doesn't act like he is in pain and the Demondim retreat to allow him pass by unharmed. Of the ways in which Jeremiah could serve Foul, I think possession sounds just like the thing.[/quote]

Lord Fouls words were not time dependant. He did not say "your son will die or serve me......... CURRENTLY...". His words may come true in a variety of ways as the next three books unfold. TC was warned by Foul at the beginning of book one of the second chronicles, but Foul's truth only came to pass at the end of book 3. What makes you think his words are coming true right now.

The Demondim were advancing on the riders who had opened a gap between themselves and their pursuers, the Demondin DO NOT retreat or allow anyone to pass, the riders are simply outpacing them.

My own view is that serving someone whilst possessed is not service, that has to be the result of a choice. Although it may change this time round, the need for actions to be by free choice, has been a core value in the chronicles and one which is needed for Foul's will and objectives to be achieved.

In the earlier chronicles, Covenant has seen the paths leading to the choices he will be asked to make and variously grasped the nettle, bluffed and reversed the choices back onto Foul, Jeremiah may well do the same. Foul may be served in a number of ways, Foul was served by Covenant saving Sunder. Foul thought he'd be served by Covenant in the Bane-fire, but was mistaken as Covenant saw another path. There are many ways to serve Foul not all of them are necessarily evil and few if any (IMO) involve possession by Foul.

I thought that Foul used mainly Ravers to do the actual possessing anyway?

Quote ROTE:

Chapter 4 Old Friends:

'Which shall I perform?' he mused cruelly. 'Would it harm you more to observe him in my service, or to witness his death in torment?' He laughed harder. 'Wretched woman! I do not reveal my aims to such as you."

Then:

'Yet this I vow. In time you will behold the fruit of my endeavours. If your son serves me, he will do so in your presence. If I slaughter him, I will do so before you. Think on that when you seek to retrieve him from me. If you discover him, you will only hasten his doom...................'

A lawyer might point out that there are a lot of 'ifs' and questions as opposed to outright statements, these seem more intention, which if they come to pass will be enacted in a certain way rather than prophecies.

Come what may, Jeremiah would not be serving him if possessed, but merely be a tool being used by him, he has to use free will to make a choice to serve, to make it count.
Last edited by finn on Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:54 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
lucimay
Lord
Posts: 15045
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Mott Wood, Genebakis
Contact:

Post by lucimay »

you all make perfect sense except i'm still not convinced. thanks for reminding me of what Foul said to Linden, your logic makes sense on this, but i just can't make the leap yet. i know, i know, i'm being obstinate. :)
you're more advanced than a cockroach,
have you ever tried explaining yourself
to one of them?
~ alan bates, the mothman prophecies



i've had this with actors before, on the set,
where they get upset about the [size of my]
trailer, and i'm always like...take my trailer,
cause... i'm from Kentucky
and that's not what we brag about.
~ george clooney, inside the actor's studio



a straight edge for legends at
the fold - searching for our
lost cities of gold. burnt tar,
gravel pits. sixteen gears switch.
Haphazard Lucy strolls by.
~ dennis r wood ~
User avatar
finn
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 4349
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 5:03 am
Location: Maintaining an unsociable distance....

Post by finn »

Just can't get my head around these quote things or italics....damn new fangled .....
User avatar
lucimay
Lord
Posts: 15045
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Mott Wood, Genebakis
Contact:

Post by lucimay »

Just can't get my head around these quote things or italics....damn new fangled .....
finn...just copy the text, paste it, highlight it, and hit the quote button underneath the subject line. makes a lovely little box around the text. now...
Spoiler
how do you do the spoiler thingy??

oh finn, you and i were posting at the same time so my response did not include your post. i think you and i are going down the same path in our thinking on jeremiah.
you're more advanced than a cockroach,
have you ever tried explaining yourself
to one of them?
~ alan bates, the mothman prophecies



i've had this with actors before, on the set,
where they get upset about the [size of my]
trailer, and i'm always like...take my trailer,
cause... i'm from Kentucky
and that's not what we brag about.
~ george clooney, inside the actor's studio



a straight edge for legends at
the fold - searching for our
lost cities of gold. burnt tar,
gravel pits. sixteen gears switch.
Haphazard Lucy strolls by.
~ dennis r wood ~
User avatar
Nerdanel
Bloodguard
Posts: 770
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 10:47 pm

Post by Nerdanel »

I used to think Joan and Roger in the "real world" were possessed by Ravers but it turns out the possessor was Lord Foul (who apparently can be in more than one place at once).

The following Gradual Interview piece proved very enlightening to me:
SRD wrote:I see "possession" ("entering") as operating along a continuum which ranges from "merely whispering nearly-inaudible suggestions" to "complete control." And on that continuum, the degree to which Lord Foul can enter a mind in the "real world" is severely limited to the low end. He couldn't do it all until the structures of Law which sustain the Land began to break down. And he still can't assume control: he can only whisper persuasively. (The Ravers can't do this at all to a mind in the "real world": only LF is that powerful. When Linden feels turiya in Joan's mind, Joan is already dead; already in the Land.)
Also, remember the possession of Anele.

I image Jeremiah's possession probably could be somewhat along the lines that Lord Foul might not necessarily directly control Jeremiah's physical actions but can coerce him to do things by mental torment and. This could be a little like an uncharitable interpretation of the Biblical Jeremiah. However at this point guesses like this are pretty much nothing more than just guesses. Perhaps Lord Foul can possess Jeremiah totally but does not wish to because he isn't that good at pretending to be a young boy. The degree of possession is very much in the air and could be different at different times.

An another thing entirely is why not Lord Foul would not make Jeremiah into his tool? Jeremiah has no white gold to complicate matters.
User avatar
finn
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 4349
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 5:03 am
Location: Maintaining an unsociable distance....

Post by finn »

[quote]finn...just copy the text, paste it, highlight it, and hit the quote button underneath the subject line. makes a lovely little box around the text. now... [/quote]


[i]testing [/i]
User avatar
finn
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 4349
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 5:03 am
Location: Maintaining an unsociable distance....

Post by finn »

[quote="finn"][quote]finn...just copy the text, paste it, highlight it, and hit the quote button underneath the subject line. makes a lovely little box around the text. now... [/quote]


[i]testing [/i][/quote]
User avatar
finn
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 4349
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 5:03 am
Location: Maintaining an unsociable distance....

Post by finn »

[quote="finn"][quote="finn"][quote]finn...just copy the text, paste it, highlight it, and hit the quote button underneath the subject line. makes a lovely little box around the text. now... [/quote]


[i]testing [/i][/quote][/quote]

Just not getting it am I!
User avatar
Nerdanel
Bloodguard
Posts: 770
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 10:47 pm

Post by Nerdanel »

I think you have the "Disable BBCode in this post" option checked for some reason. Or are you using the Quick Reply box? I have never tried posting with it.
User avatar
I'm Murrin
Are you?
Posts: 15840
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 1:09 pm
Location: North East, UK
Contact:

Post by I'm Murrin »

The quick reply box does BBCode automatically (this post is quick replied, heh).

Or at least it always has for me. I'd agree with Nerdanel here. check that option isn't selected in the 'post reply' page, and for good measure check the same option in your profile is set right.
User avatar
finn
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 4349
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 5:03 am
Location: Maintaining an unsociable distance....

Post by finn »

I think you have the "Disable BBCode in this post" option checked for some reason. Or are you using the Quick Reply box? I have never tried posting with it.
It was checked, though it must be a default as I did not do it.....here's hoping.

YeeeeHaaaa!!! Thanks guys.
User avatar
wayfriend
.
Posts: 20957
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post by wayfriend »

Okay, since we're here.

If HTML is 'on', how come this doesn't work:

<table><tr><td>left side</td><td>right side</td></tr></table>

Kevin
.
User avatar
I'm Murrin
Are you?
Posts: 15840
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 1:09 pm
Location: North East, UK
Contact:

Post by I'm Murrin »

The admins get to set which html tags are allowed on the forum, 'enabled' or otherwise. The default settings only allow <b>bold</b>, <i>italics</i>, <u>underline</u>, and <pre>pre (whatever that is)</pre>.
User avatar
wayfriend
.
Posts: 20957
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post by wayfriend »

Murrin wrote:The admins get to set which html tags are allowed on the forum, 'enabled' or otherwise. The default settings only allow <b>bold</b>, <i>italics</i>, <u>underline</u>, and <pre>pre (whatever that is)</pre>.
Oh.

Pre is good. You can do stuff like this:
<pre> Name Score
--------- ------
Wayfriend 10,000
Murrin 9,999
finn 1</pre>
.
User avatar
finn
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 4349
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 5:03 am
Location: Maintaining an unsociable distance....

Post by finn »

As long as I one!

:)
Post Reply

Return to “The Runes of the Earth”