Page 3 of 3

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:27 pm
by [Syl]
funny, same conversation over at the three seas board.

forum.three-seas.com/viewtopic.php?p=6407#6407

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:20 pm
by Plissken
Lord Mhoram wrote: So as you can see St Paul's writings are open to interpretation. Christ himself, according to the Gospels, never mentions homosexuality.
www.rotten.com/library/sex/sodomy/bible/
Of course, there's the whole question of what Jesus would've thought of what Paul made out of his teachings.

I can never quite get the image of the manic streetpreacher from "Last Temptation" out of my head...

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 6:24 am
by Iryssa
*grin* Edge and Cyberweez, you two took the words out of my mouth (I'd even just gathered my reference for Paul's vision in Acts 10 before I noticed there was a third page to this discussion)
Plissken wrote:
Lord Mhoram wrote: So as you can see St Paul's writings are open to interpretation. Christ himself, according to the Gospels, never mentions homosexuality.
www.rotten.com/library/sex/sodomy/bible/
Of course, there's the whole question of what Jesus would've thought of what Paul made out of his teachings.

I can never quite get the image of the manic streetpreacher from "Last Temptation" out of my head...
Good thing the Bible's not depending on "Last Temptation" for its view of Paul...

Paul's writings were included in the Biblical canon for a reason.

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 2:55 pm
by Lord Mhoram
Iryssa,
Paul's writings were included in the Biblical canon for a reason.
Yes and that reason is St. Paul effectively brought Christianity to the Gentiles and was aggressively able to expand the religion. That doesn't mean Christ would have agreed with everything he said.

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 3:06 pm
by Plissken
Iryssa wrote:Paul's writings were included in the Biblical canon for a reason.
For Constantine's reasons, or Christ's?

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 8:28 am
by Iryssa
Psh, don't look at me; I can't see into Constantine's motives. I've never seen anything in Paul's writings that I can't find legitimate reasons for, though.

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:00 pm
by Plissken
Sure, and the goal of most of Pauls writings was to standardize the practices of the various Christian churches.

And as for Constantine, he had the same goal: One God, One Church, One Empire. Of course, the fact that he didn't actually join the church he'd created until he was on his deathbed is pretty telling... Especially since the Bible we have now was edited to suit his needs!

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 5:47 pm
by Lord Mhoram
Plissken,

Indeed. We can thank Constantine I for our Sunday Sabbath - the day of worship for his personal deity, Apollo.

He could not make himself out to be a Christian because he claimed to be the son of Apollo himself, IIRC.

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 6:19 am
by Avatar
Always strange to think how the motives of humans have had such profound and significant impacts on something that many people take to be some irreducible message from god.

--A

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 2:10 pm
by Lord Mhoram
Avatar,

Very true, and eloquently said. :)