Page 3 of 4
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:43 am
by Fist and Faith
dennis,
I think maybe I know what Plissken has in mind. I live near New Paltz, NY. Last year, the mayor made national headlines by marrying many gay couples. Fred Phelps' clan of filth showed up.
www.recordonline.com/archive/2004/04/05/jhphelps.htm
Odds are some of the people who were there to support the marriages were Christians of strong faith, but the only "Christians" there as a
group were the evil #$%@^. Of course, if you lived nearby, you might not have imagined they would be showing up. But now that you know they
will be at these kinds of events, a group of your kind of Christian could be there too, showing that Phelps doesn't represent Christianity. And I'll bet there would be stories about
that that didn't focus on the event itself.
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:18 am
by drew
It's a shame that people can hide their hatred and fears behind Chritianity.
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 3:18 pm
by Cybrweez
drew wrote:..well, you remembered it.

haha, good point. And God does too. I guess that should be the only thing that matters anyway.
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:25 pm
by Plissken
dennisrwood wrote:Plissken: i do stand up for myself. it was real fun when the papers were tolling the death bell over the pedophile priests. i was damn angry at Cardinal Law and let folks know it, but i also spoke about the real numbers and how we needed to handle it. i believe on this board i have done a good job of defending my beliefs and my church. i'm not sure what else you would have me do? but i was talking in a broader context. if nightline runs a biased piece slamming religion, other than sending an e-mail, or writing a letter, what can i do? i already witness to everyone i know, at risk of my job sometimes. so tell me what else i need to be doing, or explain how i'm missing your point.
Well Fisty's not wrong, but to put it a little straighter - instead of (or in addition to) worrying about the results of the bias you percieve, why not go after the cause of it? Everytime there's a group of bigots out using your name, get a bigger and louder group out on the field to promote
your Christian values.
If the only one with the bullhorn is a bigot, then a bigot is all you hear.
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:52 pm
by Edge
Plissken wrote:
If the only one with the bullhorn is a bigot, then a bigot is all you hear.
An excellent point.
The conclusion I'm coming to is that, in a general sense, we (Christians) need to use that bullhorn, but use it correctly.
To illustrate: When Phelps goes on his 'God hates fags' rant, we need to send out a clear message that contradicts his hatemongering. And that message shouldn't just be 'Phelps is an idiot', but a loud and clear 'God loves gays!'.
The point I'm fumbling towards, is that we can't dispel the negative effect those people have on the general perception of Christianity just by saying 'they're wrong'. That's what people like Texe Marrs have built whole 'ministries' on, 'proving' why the Catholic Church and Billy Graham, etc. etc. are wrong.
Instead of relying on a double negative, we should be sending out a loud positive! We don't want to foster hatred toward Phelps, et al; we want to foster love for our fellow human!
Does that make sense?
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 5:15 pm
by drew
That makes more sence than you know!
I'll one-up you, the sign should read:
God Loves Gays, and Phelps, and You and Me.
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 5:24 pm
by Edge
drew wrote:
I'll one-up you, the sign should read:
God Loves Gays, and Phelps, and You and Me.
I like it!

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 5:56 pm
by Plissken
Edge wrote:Plissken wrote:
If the only one with the bullhorn is a bigot, then a bigot is all you hear.
An excellent point.
The conclusion I'm coming to is that, in a general sense, we (Christians) need to use that bullhorn, but use it correctly.
To illustrate: When Phelps goes on his 'God hates fags' rant, we need to send out a clear message that contradicts his hatemongering. And that message shouldn't just be 'Phelps is an idiot', but a loud and clear 'God loves gays!'.
The point I'm fumbling towards, is that we can't dispel the negative effect those people have on the general perception of Christianity just by saying 'they're wrong'. That's what people like Texe Marrs have built whole 'ministries' on, 'proving' why the Catholic Church and Billy Graham, etc. etc. are wrong.
Instead of relying on a double negative, we should be sending out a loud positive! We don't want to foster hatred toward Phelps, et al; we want to foster love for our fellow human!
Does that make sense?
Makes sense to me!
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 2:18 am
by Fist and Faith
Exactly! If you assume a Phelps-like group will be somewhere, maybe you'll want to go also, so people there don't see only their twisted view of Christianity, and think they represent all Christians.
What you do is: wave signs of God's love; sing songs of God's love; if anyone asks what your group is doing there, tell them about God's love.
What you don't do is: criticize Phelps' views, even if asked; even think about arguing with them, unless you believe God is about arguing; give any sign that you know Phelps is there, even if taunted.
This isn't just to drive them crazy, and it hopefully will. It's 1) to show what your God is all about, and 2) to take away their weapon, which is confrontation.
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 6:08 am
by Plissken
Of course, from my point of view, if you wanted to do a little dance on Phelps's head, while singing "Onward, Christian Militia" or whatever, that'd be fine as well...
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 6:08 am
by Iryssa
Excellent points, all...incidentally, I just read Proverbs 25:21&22 which says:
"If your enemy is hungry, give him food to eat;
if he is thirsty, give him water to drink.
In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head,
and the LORD will reward you."
Though it's not like he's our enemy per se, it still makes sense...
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 6:29 am
by Avatar
Plissken wrote:Of course, from my point of view, if you wanted to do a little dance on Phelps's head, while singing "Onward, Christian Militia" or whatever, that'd be fine as well...
ROTFLMAO!
Seriously though, I think some good points are being made. It's not to say it'll change anybodies minds, but at least it can change the perception of christians for the better.
--Avatar
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 11:14 am
by drew
Excellent quote Isyssa. (Canadians are so Great)
To take that a step further; if we treated our enemies like our friend, how many enimies will we be left with?
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 11:59 am
by Avatar
An excellent question Drew.
--Avatar
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:13 am
by Fist and Faith
Lao Tzu says to reward bitterness with care.
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:39 am
by ChoChiyo
Fist and Faith wrote:dennis,
I think maybe I know what Plissken has in mind. I live near New Paltz, NY. Last year, the mayor made national headlines by marrying many gay couples. Fred Phelps' clan of filth showed up.
www.recordonline.com/archive/2004/04/05/jhphelps.htm
That article was about the most heartwarming thing I've seen in the news EVER.
THIS, I believe is what Jesus meant about turning the other cheek.
Those idiots sow hatred. The people sowed love.
Love will always win over hate. It is impossible for it to be any other way.
My heart swells with love for all the good people I have met here.

Come'ere for a big group cuddle!
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 11:40 am
by drew
**joins Cho's group hug.
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:55 pm
by Plissken
May I have hugs too, please?
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 5:47 pm
by ChoChiyo

everyone gets a hug.
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 2:16 am
by Fist and Faith