KaosArcana wrote:CovenantJR:
But back to the discussion!..... I am adamant that Foul is not remotely human. I approve of the Haruchai name for him - Corruption - this, to me, expresses Foul's nature; he is almost a force rather than a living thing. He is evil incarnate, he existed before humans were created, and he will exist after they are gone. As F&F so astutely observed, humans are motivated by greed, malice, evil, whereas Foul is these things - it's his very nature...
Also, I don't think Foul could have existed before there were sentient
beings, and I don't think he could endure once they pass. Despite
cannot exist unless there is something capable of self-loathing.
I never suggested Foul existed before
sentient beings - he is sentient himself, as is the Creator - however, he existed before the humans of the Land were created; he existed before the Land
itself was created. We have no idea how old Foul was when he was imprisoned, but there is no question that he pre-dates this particular race of humans.
As for the question of whether Foul is evil, I think it depends on your definition of evil. If you consider that "evil" requires a conscious choice, I would hold that this excludes Foul. To my mind, Foul has no choice in the matter - his only choice is
how he performs his evil, IMO. When I said Foul is a force, I didn't mean to imply that he is in any way the
source of evil, simply that evil is his nature - it is more than a choice or even a compulsion - he is evil because that's
what he is. He can't stop being evil any more than we can stop being human. I suppose you say evil so intense is almost a species of it's own - albeit perhaps a species of one...
I'm not sure I've really clarified anything, but I gave it my best shot
