Kevin's Watch

Wyldewode wrote:

emotional leper wrote: Bill Kaulitz makes me question my heterosexuality.

Though I don't like guys.

You gave up on David Bowie?

David Bowie, being a God, can choose to manifest himself as whatever sex he desires.

Well this is a man thread, and it should be duly noted (as I have posted before, but cant find it) that it has been mathematically proven that women are evil:

Let W = Woman
M = Money
T = Time
E = Evil

Assume the following fundamental truths:
Women are Time and Money (W = T + M)
Time is Money (T = M )
Money is the root of all Evil (M = √E )

We start with the basic truth:

W = T + M

Since Time is Money, we substitute:

W = M + M

and simplifying to:
W = M²


SInce M = √E, then it follows that M² = E,
Therefore W = E: and there you have it:

Women are Evil!!

iQuestor wrote:Well this is a man thread, and it should be duly noted (as I have posted before, but cant find it) that it has been mathematically proven that women are evil:

Let W = Woman
M = Money
T = Time
E = Evil

Assume the following fundamental truths:
Women are Time and Money (W = T + M)
Time is Money (T = M )
Money is the root of all Evil (M = √E )

We start with the basic truth:

W = T + M

Since Time is Money, we substitute:

W = M + M

and simplifying to:
W = M²


SInce M = √E, then it follows that M² = E,
Therefore W = E: and there you have it:

Women are Evil!!

You posted this in a temporary babble forum that was once on here somewhere.

Much as I admire the sentiment of proving women are evil with mathematics, it's this bit that lets your theory down....

W = M + M

and simplifying to:
W = M²

Good catch, Stone.

I've seen this same argument elsewhere, but instead of W = M + T, it was written W = M x T, which would then work.

Women are the product of time and money.

That's how it's supposed to be stated before simplification.

emotional leper wrote:

Wyldewode wrote:

emotional leper wrote: Bill Kaulitz makes me question my heterosexuality.

Though I don't like guys.

You gave up on David Bowie?

David Bowie, being a God, can choose to manifest himself as whatever sex he desires.

I suppose that solves the problem, then.

Fist and Faith wrote:No matter how hard I try, I can't see all of thefirst's posts. All that's coming through is this:

thefirst wrote:blah blah blah I can lay blah blah blah blah blah 4" heels blah blah blah blah

What's wrong with my monitor????

I'm glad I'm not the only who only skims the female posts looking for refferences on shoes or underwear.

Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah panties blah blah blah blah blah thong blah blah blah blah fishnet blah blah blah....

Hi, Jenn!! Good to see you!!

Q-How can you tell if the woman you're with, is enjoying the sex?















































A-Who cares?

blah blah blah thigh high stilletto boots blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah yammer yammer yammer yammer yammer blah blah blah!

Good to see you too Fisty!

Drew, IMO a better version of that joke is:

Q: Why do 75% of women fake their orgasms?
A: Because they think we give a shit.

I'm evil

All sorts of info on fake orgasms:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fake_orgasm

Anyway, as far as the time and money thing goes, here's the close thread we discussed it on earlier:
kevinswatch.ihugny.com/phpBB2/viewtopic ... 29&start=0

My favorite was wyldewode's post at the end:

Wyldewode wrote:

finn wrote:By the way evil is just mirror text for live.

Yes it is, Finn. As most of us know live is an intransitive verb meaning "to have life, as an organism; be alive; be capable of vital functions." And as much as the addition of the letter a to the word live yields a word meaning "having life; living; existing; not dead or lifeless," I think it is only fair to use these formulas:

women= evil
evil= live (reversed)
live+a=alive

So we end up with this equation:

women=evil=live (reversed) +a= alive=women

It is clearly an equation that states a simple fact: without women NO ONE here would be alive!



Scoff if you must.

Men just got pwned

I thought this thread looked familiar. Thanks for bringing that up, Holsety.

Holsety wrote:Drew, IMO a better version of that joke is:

Q: Why do 75% of women fake their orgasms?
A: Because they think we give a shit.

I'm evil

All sorts of info on fake orgasms:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fake_orgasm

Anyway, as far as the time and money thing goes, here's the close thread we discussed it on earlier:
kevinswatch.ihugny.com/phpBB2/viewtopic ... 29&start=0

My favorite was wyldewode's post at the end:

Wyldewode wrote:

finn wrote:By the way evil is just mirror text for live.

Yes it is, Finn. As most of us know live is an intransitive verb meaning "to have life, as an organism; be alive; be capable of vital functions." And as much as the addition of the letter a to the word live yields a word meaning "having life; living; existing; not dead or lifeless," I think it is only fair to use these formulas:

women= evil
evil= live (reversed)
live+a=alive

So we end up with this equation:

women=evil=live (reversed) +a= alive=women

It is clearly an equation that states a simple fact: without women NO ONE here would be alive!



Scoff if you must.

Men just got pwned

People who can't do logic just got pwned!

What's next? You're going to use my horoscope to show which house one has to be born in to be a misanthrope?

emotional leper wrote: People who can't do logic just got pwned!

Wow. . . touchy, hmm? Seems you like the equation when it says women are evil, but feel the need to mock an equally silly (and ultimately meaningless) reversal?

emotional leper wrote:What's next? You're going to use my horoscope to show which house one has to be born in to be a misanthrope?

No. . . one can usually tell a misanthrope by his words and his actions.

Holsety wrote:Drew, IMO a better version of that joke is:

Q: Why do 75% of women fake their orgasms?
A: Because they think we give a shit.

I've usually heard it as how can you tell if your woman had an orgasm. Answered by who cares...I just wanted to clean it up a little.